When a light grey sweatshirt appeared on online shopping site Revolve on Wednesday, it was supposed to start a conversation.

And it did. Just not the one it intended to.

In less than 24 hours, images of the controversial item of clothing released to raise money for girls’ education were trending online for being fat-phobic, inappropriate and deeply offensive. So much so, the jumper has since been removed from the site and can no longer be purchased.

All because of its slogan:

“Being fat is not beautiful, it’s an excuse.”

Jesus Christ @REVOLVE what are you doing?! pic.twitter.com/Jtv0fHQEpI

— Jameela Jamil (@jameelajamil) September 12, 2018

LOLLLLL @REVOLVE y’all are a mess. pic.twitter.com/CrzOkd5oE4

— Tess Holliday ???? (@Tess_Holliday) September 12, 2018

Hi @REVOLVE let’s talk about why this is so misguided and stupid: https://t.co/YrLAe8yBNP

— Tyler McCall (@eiffeltyler) September 12, 2018

so the brand that doesn’t cater to women above a size 10 @REVOLVE made these sweatshirts to combat “internet trolling” but decided to put the sweatshirt about fat shaming on a skinny model. pic.twitter.com/4WaeVHDjn2

— tiffromthe6 (@tiffromthe6) September 12, 2018

What the hell is this @REVOLVE!? pic.twitter.com/aQtvmcEkR8

— Felicity (@FelicityHayward) September 12, 2018

SHAME ON YOU @REVOLVE How dare you! #revolveisabully #boycottrevolve We are all created equally beautiful. pic.twitter.com/3n64DkrRWw

— J’s Closet (@JoAnnBravo1972) September 13, 2018

But how did something with such good intentions go so terribly wrong?

It was a perfect storm of unfortunate errors, perhaps the first being the jumper’s design.

The jumper was one of five in a collection designed by US fashion label LPA The Label that were meant to highlight toxic narratives involving high profile women. Proceeds from the sale of the $295 jumpers were to go to New York-based charity Girls Write Now.

In collaboration with actress Lena Dunham, the jumpers each featured an abusive comment women in the public eye – Dunham, Cara Delevigne, Emily Ratajkowski, Suki Waterhouse and Paloma Elsesser – had received from trolls online.

Other slogans in the collection were to include: ‘Too boney to be boned’, ‘If you translated a bum onto her face, she’d have a better face’, ‘Horrible result of modern feminism’ and ‘Slut feminist nightmare’.

The collection of five jumpers. Image: Twitter.

If you look closely at the jumpers, you'll see underneath the derogatory quotes a line in much smaller font that reads 'as told to @", to indicate which comment was made to which woman.

Then came the marketing of the jumper, which was particularly tone-deaf.

According to LPA's founder Pia Arrobio, the image of a thin, blonde, white model wearing the 'fat-shaming' jumper was never meant to appear anywhere on the internet.

In a statement shared on their Instagram account, it was instead supposed to be advertised being worn by the woman who was sent the offending comment. In the case of this jumper, it was Paloma, a plus-size model and influencer. That particular jumper was also not meant to be released before some of the others, which might have given it supporting context.

"Where we faltered was not intention, sincerity or conception, but in my own lack of communication that lead to how the collection was portrayed on Revolve.com and the pre-mature release of the e-commerce imagery, a day prior to launch. We were planning to launch with an image of Lena in the sweatshirt along with our statement and explanation," the statement read.

"We work hard to make the right choices every day, understanding the platform and the opportunity that we are lucky enough to have, and we are so sorry to have let you all down."

Despite the company's sincere apology, many have also pointed out the jumper, which was meant to highlight the fat-shaming women endure online, was only made in sizes up to an XL.

Since the jumper was removed from Revolve, Dunham has made a statement of her own distancing herself from Revolve and the surrounding backlash.

"Without consulting me or any of the women involved, @revolve presented the sweatshirts on thin white women, never thinking about the fact that difference and individuality is what gets you punished on the Internet, or that lack of diversity in representation is a huge part of the problem (in fact, the problem itself.)," she posted on Instagram.

"As a result, I cannot support this collaboration or lend my name to it in any way. This doesn’t take away from my love or respect for what Pia has done with LPA, but I am deeply disappointed in @revolve’s handling of a sensitive topic and a collaboration rooted in reclaiming the words of internet trolls to celebrate the beauty in diversity and bodies and experiences that aren’t the industry norm." (Read her full statement below.)

The writer and director also said she plans to make a contribution to the Girls Write Now, as does LPA. In their own statement, Revolve has pledged to donate $20,000 to the charity.

Unfortunately, context is what killed this well-intended but poorly-executed initiative.

And once you've lost it, it's really hard to get back.

Do you think this jumper could have ever avoided becoming a social media scandal?