-With AAP.

1. Changing details and new SIM cards: How Borce Ristevski tried to avoid detection for killing his wife.

On April 18 2019, Borce Ristevski was sentenced to nine years in prison for the death of Karen Ristevski.

Borce Ristevski constructed a large web of lies to try and avoid investigators finding out that he killed his wife Karen, according to newly released court documents.

A ruling made by Justice Christopher Beale last week and published on Monday led to prosecutors withdrawing the charge of murder, and Ristevski admitting instead to the lesser charge of manslaughter of his 47-year-old wife Karen.

Ristevski may have killed his wife, shoved her body in the back of her Mercedes-Benz and dumped her between two logs in a forest, but that didn’t prove he meant to murder her, the Supreme Court of Victoria found.

Mamamia’s daily news podcast gets you up to speed with what you need to know today…

The court documents revealed how far 55-year-old Ristevski went to avoid detection for the crime.

During conversations with his daughter Sarah, Ristevski allegedly was critical of the police investigation and said “they don’t give a f***” in a taped phone call.

The documents also show Ristevski seemingly knew his mobile phone was tapped and was trying to get Sarah’s boyfriend to obtain new SIM cards. He changed his phone number twice.

He also told different people different stories.

Ristevski initially told police his wife went upstairs to cool off after an argument about finances, but later changed his story to say she immediately left the house out the front door. At another point he said she had left through the garage.

He told a friend he went to Lalor the morning Karen disappeared but did not tell this to police. He instructed his friend: “Make sure you don’t repeat anything.”

According to the documents published with Justice Beale’s ruling, Ristevski was informed by A Current Affair that a body had been found in bushland, but Ristevski immediately answered: “Well, it’s got nothing to do with me.”

The Crown alleged that after killing his wife at their Avondale Heights home, following a series of arguments about their finances, Ristevski drove his wife’s body towards Macedon Regional Park.

Police said on the way, Ristevski turned off both his and his wife’s mobile phones, then dumped his bride’s body, covering it in branches.

Mrs Ristevski’s body was not found for almost eight months.

It was claimed Ristevski lied to his family, friends and the police about what happened.

But Justice Beale said prosecutors could not rely on Ristevski’s post-crime conduct to prove murderous intent.

Defence lawyers argued in pre-trial deliberations that there was a lack of motive for the 55-year-old to have murdered his wife, a lack of a history of violence and a lack of evidence of premeditation.

They also argued the couple’s financial position would likely deteriorate if Ristevski killed his wife, given she was the “heartbeat” of the Bella Bleu clothing business they co-operated.

Justice Beale said the killer’s post-offence behaviour could have meant, as argued by his legal team, Ristevski feared estrangement from his daughter and substantial prison time.

“… In this case there was no evidence of murderous intent other than the post-offence conduct,” Justice Beale said in his reasons.

He agreed with the defence team that a lack of evidence showing premeditation supported the inference that Ristevski’s conduct was “spontaneous” and his post-offence behaviour was consistent with a “panicked reaction”.

Ristevski will next appear in the Supreme Court of Victoria for a pre-sentence plea hearing on March 27.

2. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern promises urgent reform of New Zealand gun laws.

New Zealand cabinet backs change to gun laws within 10 days after mosque shooting pic.twitter.com/FpkceTElNK

— The Independent (@Independent) March 18, 2019

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has pledged a swift crackdown on guns as the city of Christchurch continues to mourn and prepares to bury its dead.

Ten people, including a four-year-old girl, remained in critical condition on Monday, three days after a shooting at two mosques allegedly carried out by Australian white supremacist Brenton Tarrant killed 50 and wounded 50 more.

Ardern confirmed she would present new gun laws within 10 days, while calling for residents to consider voluntarily handing over their firearms.

“The clear lesson from history around the world is that to make our community safer, the time to act is now,” she said.

Earlier in the day, it was revealed Tarrant had bought four guns online from a Christchurch store, none of which were the semi-automatic rifles used in the massacre.

It’s thought the weapons employed in the attack were bought legally using a licence and then later modified.

Meanwhile, in NSW, counter-terrorism police assisting New Zealand investigators raided two homes, including one that’s believed to belong to Tarrant’s sister.

“The community can be assured that there is no information to suggest a current or impending threat related to this search warrants,” Australian Federal Police and NSW Police said.

Officers from the AFP and the United States’ FBI have also joined 250 Kiwi investigators working on the case.

While armed officers maintained a heavy presence across Christchurch and mosques are expected to remain under guard until Friday, residents on Monday began to return to work and schools.

Preparations were still underway for funerals in the city’s east, as families of victims continued to wait for the release of bodies.

Investigators have in recent days tried to give assurances they’re acting as swiftly as possible, amid concerns the delays have prevented the swift burials called for under Islamic tradition.

Hundreds of students in the evening gathered near Deans Avenue, near where gunfire first broke out on Friday, the latest in a series of vigils held across the country.

But an official memorial would not be held this week, Ardern confirmed.

“We want to ensure that the priority for the coming days is the families’ opportunity to grieve together,” she said.

During the day, emergency staff involved in the response told their stories to media.

“There was a river of blood coming out of the mosque … It was literally flowing off terracotta tiles,” said ambulance technician Paul Bennett, who said even working through the deadly Christchurch earthquake of 2011 had not prepared him for what he found.

“The scene at Deane Avenue was about hatred.”

Nearby, an 18-year-old local man accused of distributing a live-stream of the attack posted by Tarrant, but was not connected to the attack, appear in the district court.

The teen – who is also charged with posting a photograph of one of the mosques attacked with the message “target acquired” – was denied bail and could face up to 14 years’ jail if found guilty.

Facebook earlier said it had taken down 1.5 million copies of footage.

In Canberra, Scott Morrison call for supporters of Tarrant to be called out, saying the sheer number of disturbing responses in support of the Christchurch terror attack showed how hard it was to identify potential terrorists.

Authorities have confirmed Tarrant will stand trial in New Zealand and any deportation is unlikely until his potential sentence is fully served.

3. “It was very, very distressing”: New Zealand ambulance staff recall the scene at Christchurch mosque.

Absolutely harrowing stories from some of the ambulance staff who responded to the Christchurch massacre. NSW Ambulance sending a crisis psychology team to help crews cope with trauma @9NewsAUS pic.twitter.com/ALQdCMNwxu

— Andrew Lund (@andrew_lund) March 18, 2019

While he worked through the earthquake that devastated Christchurch, ambulance technician Paul Bennett says he had never seen anything like what awaited him at the mosque targeted by a gunman last week.

“There was a river of blood coming out of the mosque … It was literally flowing off terracotta tiles,” he said.

“The scene at Deane Avenue was about hatred.”

He and other emergency staff have recalled in detail the scene on Friday after shootings at two mosques left 50 dead and 50 more injured in New Zealand’s worst shooting.

Among those on shift when the news broke was a recent graduate from an Australian university on his first day on the job.

“He had spent a total of four weeks in the back of an ambulance prior to that day, so baptism by fire,” shift supervisor Jason Watson said.

“He turned up at the mosque and took part.”

Some visibly emotional as they grappled with what had occurred, the group of respondents told reporters of stepping over bodies to collect the wounded and the unparalleled stream of reports that rushed in from 1.44pm.

Call handler Spencer Dennehy, nine months in the job, discussed how in her first call she had to keep a woman, whose two-year-old and husband were in one of the mosques at the time, from going after her family.

“She was very emotional and hysterical … she was determined to go,” Dennehy, a Christchurch resident herself, said, noting all three survived.

“It was very, very distressing … I was trying to be strong for her.”

Watson, meanwhile, said he was left surprised only one victim had died in hospital following the incident.

“A good half of the patients I saw go into the back of ambulances I expected to die within an hour,” he said.

“The fact that only one has is incredible and is a plus to the entire Christchurch emergency services community and members of the public that helped out.

Twelve of 50 people injured remained in critical condition over the weekend, including one child.

4. Australia’s worst female serial killer Kathleen Megan Folbigg to give evidence at inquiry.

Kathleen Folbigg will give evidence to an inquiry about the diaries that helped secure her conviction for killing her four babies. https://t.co/aoEOYRAyA5

— The Australian (@australian) March 18, 2019

The barrister acting for Australia’s worst female serial killer has been blasted by the judicial officer presiding over an inquiry into her convictions after documents were leaked.

“Are you appearing in this court or are you running your case in the media?” former NSW District Court chief judge Reginald Blanch QC asked Jeremy Morris SC, who is representing Kathleen Megan Folbigg, on Monday.

Mr Blanch said the situation was appalling and noted “in the ordinary course of events” it would be considered contempt of court.

A published ABC article includes material that was not tendered at any preliminary hearings and will be not be admitted into evidence at the inquiry into Folbigg’s convictions.

“Your Honour, I will make some inquiries,” Mr Morris said at the Lidcombe coronial complex.

Folbigg was jailed for at least 25 years in 2003 after she was found guilty of killing her four babies – Caleb, Patrick, Sarah and Laura – in the decade from 1989.

Her children all died at home aged between 19 days and 19 months.

The NSW government agreed to a judicial review of her case in August 2018 and hearings began on Monday.

The 51-year-old has confirmed in writing she will testify on April 17 and 18. She didn’t take the stand at her trial.

“Ms Folbigg is allowed to give evidence … about the diary entries, possession of the diaries and her disposal of the diaries,” counsel assisting, Gail Furness SC, said in her opening address.

She cited various entries by Folbigg which were presented to the jury as circumstantial evidence.

These included comments about baby Sarah who “left, with a bit of help” and Laura being “a fairly good-natured baby” which “saved her from the fate of her siblings”.

“I think she was warned,” Folbigg wrote in December 1997.

Laura died in March 1999.

The inquiry is focused on medical advances and new research – including multiple infant deaths in the one family attributed to unidentified natural causes.

The crown prosecutor in 2003 submitted “it has never been recorded that the same person has been hit by lightning four times” and “I can’t disprove that one day some piglets might be born with wings and that they might fly. Is that reasonable doubt?”.

The judge directed the jury that sudden infant death syndrome deaths were rare and while there was no authenticated record of three or more such deaths in one family that didn’t mean it was impossible.

Professor Rosemary Horne on Monday testified SIDS itself was rare but “the general consensus seems to be that more than one SIDS in a family is very rare”.

“I have asked my colleagues … in the UK and USA and none of them could recall having three or more deaths in a family,” the Monash University paediatric researcher said.

Both she and Professor Dawn Elder, who heads paediatrics at New Zealand’s University of Otago, gave evidence that all four of Folbigg’s children had a low risk of SIDS.

Mr Blanch will prepare a report on the inquiry’s results for the NSW governor.

If the judicial officer feels there’s reasonable doubt over Folbigg’s guilt he can refer the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal.

Folbigg will, at present, be eligible for parole in April 2028. The inquiry continues.

5. “When the next person dies you can get help.” Aged care commission hears stories of suffering dementia patients.

The second hearings of the royal commission into aged care have got under way, with evidence from carers given in Adelaide.https://t.co/ItAIYchUUj

— SBS News (@SBSNews) March 18, 2019

Australians living with dementia suffering the “deepest and darkest” depression have been forced to wait for people to die so they can access adequate care.

The royal commission into aged care heard evidence from carers in Adelaide on Monday as the second hearings got under way.

Rock musician Veda Meneghetti is cared for by her friend Lynda Henderson, with the pair living together in regional NSW.

Ms Henderson said there was a common experience among the many depressed friends they had made since Ms Meneghetti was diagnosed in September 2012 at the age of 61.

“Every person we have met has gone through the deepest and darkest depression at some stage,” Ms Henderson told the hearing.

Ms Meneghetti has a rare form of dementia which affects her speech, reading and comprehension.

Her first provider, HammondCare, took 34 per cent of the home care package in management fees – vastly above the 14 per cent which is now being taken.

Ms Henderson said they were sent staff with no senior first aid training, inadequate knowledge of manual handling and other occupational health and safety practices.

HammondCare also didn’t provide advice on case management, she said, forcing Ms Henderson to do it herself with the help of a GP, two neurologists and a retired registered nurse.

“That made me extremely angry,” she said.

Ms Henderson said Australia badly needed a review of national qualifications and career path ways for people working with dementia.

Ms Meneghetti spent six months waiting for an upgrade to the highest level of care, a level-four package, with Ms Henderson the only person supporting her for 20 hours a day.

She said she believed she was still recovering from post-traumatic stress from that period caring for her friend.

“Every morning she had two-hour long panic attacks which were terrifying. Those panic attacks were unbelievable,” Ms Henderson said.

Raelene Ellis, who cared for her mother for more than two years after her dementia diagnosis, said she was told someone would have to die before a higher level of care could be accessed.

“Someone shouldn’t have to be told ‘when the next person dies you can get help, but until then tough bickies you can’t’,” she told the hearing.

When she was finally given a level four package, it only amounted to nine hours of care a week after the provider charged 38 per cent in administrative fees.

Ms Ellis emotionally recounted how difficult it was to realise her mother would have to go into residential care.

Presbyterian Aged Care NSW and ACT boss Paul Sadler said government letters informing people they’ve been approved to receive a home care package, and have been put on a waiting list, often leave people confused.

“People don’t understand that difference,” he said.

Mr Sadler said the system should be more transparent, including making it clearer how the government decides who receives home care packages first.

“As a community, we should have an expectation that we understand how the system operates.”