Likening the fashion and modelling industry to drug dealing may seem like a harsh comparison, but according to Christine Morgan, CEO of eating disorders group The Butterfly Foundation, it’s unfortunately an accurate one.
In an interview in The Daily Telegraph on Wednesday, Morgan said that the adulation the fashion industry heaps on extremely thin women was “…akin to giving young kids (the drug) ice. Some of them are going to end up addicts.”
In the words of every teenage girl at the mall: Way harsh. But also… true.
Given the look of some of today’s most popular high fashion models – and the fact that 90% of Australian girls aged 12-17 have been on some kind of diet – it appears that sadly, she may have a point.
When models are fainting, tissues are being eaten and women have waists the size of seven-year-old girls, it’s obvious that things in high fashion have spiralled out of control.
Obvious to everyone it would seem, except the people working in high fashion.
Australia’s Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week is wrapping up today, and what was meant to be a week celebrating the talent of our local designers has instead, once again, turned into a national conversation about the shock and disappointment at the ever-shrinking size of the models who work these shows.
Given that there has been such a positive reaction to the rise of healthy-sized models by many magazines and retailers in recent years, it seems strange that the high fashion industry simply refuses to budge.
Designers, model agents and magazine editors remain unmoved by concerns for the physical and mental health of both the models they use and the girls and women they influence. The proof of this can be seen in their refusal to bow to any kind of pressure to use models who aren’t extremely – and doctors say, in many cases dangerously and unhealthily – thin.
Of course, each of the three blame each other: the designers say they can’t make sample sizes (the name for garments that are used in fashion shows and photo shoots) that don’t fit the tiny models; the magazine editors say they can’t use models that don’t fit the tiny sample sizes the designers make; and the model agents say they can’t find work for girls who aren’t small enough for the sample sizes used by the designers and the editors.
It’s a stalemate that the high fashion industry has long insisted is too complicated to be broken. Three groups, each insisting they want the same thing, can’t work out a way to make it happen because the other is getting in their way? Right.
It sounds like they actually have no intention of changing their ways. After all, high fashion is apparently about the art of clothing, and if clothing looks better on women with bodies the size of children, then they’re the bodies they’ll use.
But do they realise that the ridiculous, unhealthy bubble they’ve happily nestled into together is shrinking around them?
More and more people – not just in the media and health sectors – are speaking out against the dangerous standards that the high fashion industry treat as the norm.
Mamamia even posted an article earlier this year about the new practice of ‘reverse retouching’, where models are being photoshopped to make them appear larger and less unhealthy.
The negative discourse and push-back against these unhealthy ideals is increasing at a ferocious pace.
But negative criticism from those outside their group doesn’t seem to bother those who are in it. And although the bubble around them may be shrinking, those inside certainly don’t seem any closer to letting it burst.
Top Comments
Excellent topic
It's getting to the point that if designers don't want real women to wear their clothes, then just parade the clothes on a coat hanger or push their model mannequin down a runway and just call it a "live art gallery" to admire your work, stop forcing girls to fit to your unrealistic mannequin!