Warning: this post contains graphic descriptions of sexual assault, rape and suicide and may be triggering for some readers.
For 24-hour crisis support please call Lifeline on 13 11 14 or the National Sexual Assault Counselling Service on 1800 RESPECT.
On Tuesday afternoon, 24-year-old Michaela Dunn was found dead in her Clarence Street unit. It’s alleged she was killed by a man who had been in contact with her in her capacity as a sex worker.
The murder of a young woman is fortunately rare, but violence against sex workers is not. In 2016, Mamamia spoke to a number of sex workers about their experiences of violence at work, and the unique barriers they face in pursuing justice.
**
There’s a look, Madison Missina says. It’s hard to explain, hard to teach others to recognise, but it’s something any woman or man who’s seen it will understand. The look someone gets in the moment before they assault you. It’s dark, she says, almost psychopathic.
On December 1, 2011, Madison saw that look.
She was working for a “sugar daddy” dating website at the time, a portal via which men – usually wealthy – pay women for dates or company. Essentially a hired girlfriend situation, she explained exclusively to Mamamia.
The man who booked her that evening invited her to his Sydney hotel room. Hours slipped by with nothing but conversation, as it often does with clients, she explained. It was getting late, so he suggested they dissolve their dinner plans and order in.
Top Comments
'“It was a horrible experience. Just to be told that the simple fact of, 'I don't like what you're doing and you're hurting me, but could you at least use a condom' could take away five hours of tears, of 'no', of 'stop', of 'I don't want this to happen',” she said.'
YOUR REQUEST TO BE HURT LESS BY AN ABUSER DOES *NOT* TAKE AWAY THE FACT THAT YOU WERE A VICTIM OF A CRIME.
'the prosecutors of her case had decided not to proceed to court. Madison said they told her about the difficulty of persuading juries that rape has occurred in cases involving sex workers, and that asking the client to wear protection could be misinterpreted to look like a sign of consent.'
AND? PROSECUTORS DECIDED. THAT'S OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. NO ACCOUNTABILITY.
'could be misinterpreted' BUT YOU DIDN'T EVEN TRY. HOW WOULD YOU KNOW? CRIMINALS GET OFF ALL THE TIME WITH THE RIGHT LAWYER. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE SIDE OF THE VICTIM.
I hope you all realise that, as a victim, you don't get to decide whether to press charges. The police do. And even if they go ahead, if the prosecution decides 'there isn't a good chance of success they don't proceed. WHAT THE HELL KIND OF JUSTICE SYSTEM IS THAT? AND WE WANT TO PREACH TO OTHER COUNTRIES ABOUT THEIR CONSTITUTION? AT LEAST THEY HAVE ONE THAT PROTECTS THEM AGAINST AUTHORITARIAN POWER.
Imagine if a criminal is holding a gun to your head and you say to them, "don't shoot me in the head, shoot me in the leg"
The prosecutor could say that, technically, you gave the criminal permission to shoot you in the leg.
THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN. AND HAS BEEN FOR TOO LONG.
NO means NO, no matter who you are.