By NATALIA HAWK
WARNING: This article deals with an account of rape/sexual assault and may be triggering for survivors of abuse.
UPDATE: The 13-year-old alleged rape victim in the Maryville case has released her name and also spoken out. Her name is Paige Parkhurst, and she sat down with her mother to tell America Tonight about exactly what happened that night.
She recounted the evening, saying that by sharing her story, she’s hoping to stop sexual assault and cyber bullying:
I want other women and girls and men and boys not to be afraid to speak out against sexual assault. It is a very big epidemic in the world, and I just hope that other people can be brave enough to speak up when this happened to them.
And I’d also like to move forward and begin my life again, and to have known that there’s that piece of security of knowing that I at least tried to my best ability to have something done.
You can read the full transcript of her interview here.
—-
Who remembers the Steubenville rape?
Last year, two 16-year-old male football players from Steubenville, Ohio, were charged with raping a 16-year-old girl at a party while she was unconscious. Students who witnessed the assault used Instagram, Twitter, Youtube and texting to share photos and video of the rape.
But despite the evidence, the community rallied together to support the footballers. The victim was treated like a criminal. Social media messages shamed the 16-year-old girl, suggesting that she’d consented to events that took place that night.
During the trial, the defence team for the football players argued that the victim – who was heavily intoxicated on the night and unconscious for much of it – consented to sex because she did not “say no”.
In March this year, the two boys were found guilty of rape; each received the minimum sentence. The case was discussed all over the world. So many were shocked by the reaction of the town and their immediate swing towards protecting a popular pair of football players. So many were horrified by the disgusting things said about the female victim.
Top Comments
Sounds familiar to past happenings in Australia with our footballers.It has happened too often in Australia that a lady says she was raped by one or more footballers. The cases are investigated and then the cases are closed without it going to court. It's strange that all these ladies were saying that it was rape, when it appears it is not; or is it rape, and the cases are also just been swept under the mat, because we all know footballers, just don't rape.
You all might like to read about BOTH sides of this story. This girl and mother refused to answer questions from Police, yet went to the media and set up a photo shoot etc. things are not as clear cut as feminist interest groups would have you believe. This is exactly why we need to exercise caution in trial by Internet.
I think it does a major disservice to justice to name the alleged assailant. Reason why is trial by media will taint and bias potential jurors, and if by chance he is innocent then his reputation gets messed up. It's horrible what happened to the girls but until guilty, keep both victims and alleged assailants anonymous until they have given permission, or if found guilty. The guilty you can goto town with naming n shaming, but ensure that we never get innocent's caught up in these media witchhunts. And yes of course I hope no one ever gets raped, I hope that evidence can be used in a new trial to convict the rapist because that is pretty damn terrible that it didn't count as enough evidence!
You can't press charges without giving a statement to the police, so already what you are saying is false. But let's put aside for a moment whether or not Barnett actually did it and presume that only Daisy and Matthew know what actually happened.
Isn't it deeply concerning that the publics reaction is to harass Daisy and her family to the point that they have to leave town, burn their house down, start anti-Daisy internet pages and call her a skank? Just because she told the police that she was raped?
People are very comfortable with the presumption of innocence for the accused - yet seem very comfortable with the presumption that the complainant is a lying skank. That is deeply, deeply concerning.
Remember, though, that in this case he admitted to having sex with her and filming it. Given her age, that is already at least* two criminal acts; statutory rape and producing child porn.
That aside though, I don't think this article is focusing on encouraging vigilant justice. I think the main thing being raised here is why people are so quick to call the complainant a liar, punish and bully her.
If people don't know what happened, then why would they so vehemently attack the complainant? Sure, don't go out in support of her if you don't know what happened. But going out in support of him, or actively attacking her is just as bad (or in my actual opinion, far worse) than speaking out in anger against an accused.
*Filming a person during sex without consent is also a crime in some places, and there may be some crime that leaving her unconscious in freezing temps falls under too.