So far nine women have said porn star James Deen abused them.
Deen is calling for “context” in the face of the accusations, which come from ex-partners and fellow performers in the porn industry.
Previously lauded as a “feminist”, the industry’s “boy next door” has vehemently denied the allegations of rape and sexual assault, first on Twitter and now in an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast, in which he labelled them “baffling”.
“I have spent this past week terrified and confused so I can’t help but run through the details of our relationship in my head,” Deen said referring to his relationship with ex-girlfriend Stoya, who late last month was the first woman to publicly condemn him for rape.
She did so, unambiguously, in 55 words posted on her Twitter account.
“James Deen held me down and f**ked me while I said no, stop, used my safe word,” wrote the porn actress, writer and activist, “I just can’t nod and smile when people bring him up anymore.”
Deen says he can’t “speak to her motivations” but speculated that they could be “as simple as [Stoya] finding out that my current girlfriend and I are moving in together.”
“All of the accusations are from either ex-girlfriends or events that happened on set,” Deen said, calling for people to “step back and analyse this stuff in context.”
The context being, his job “as a performer for rough sex companies”, which requires him to engage in “certain acts”.
Top Comments
This is an interesting case. I believe that we cannot say this man is guilty based solely on accusations made online. Also, I have my doubts about the Teen Mom girl. She just seems like she is jumping on the bandwagon for publicity. All the women have claimed physical abuse, rough sex and rape. None mentioned being drugged. What she's saying sounds more like Cosby's mo.
Innocent until proven guilty is a fundamental right in our legal system. Not innocent until accused. I understand this makes it hard on some victims but it is much better than the alternative.
Well this isn't a court of law and i am entitled to believe the victims if i like and will. The courts get it wrong every day anyway.
Ps many of the perfomers have witnesses that have said the allegations are true.
Why is it so hard to believe women?
It's not a gender issue about believing women unless you see things through a gender prisim. It's a crime issue first and foremost. The truth is none of us know the truth about the allegations and we, thankfully given the alternative, treat people as innocent until proven guilty.
Why is it so hard to believe women? Because we don't just believe anyone, man or woman, when a crime is alleged. It's not enough, the evidence must be strong enough to remove doubt.
Why is it so hard not to make it about gender? It's a basic legal right for any crime which applies to both genders equally.
I also didn't say I didn't believe the woman, just that he has the right to be presumed innocent.
Why is it so hard to believe men?