The starting point for aspiring politicians should be a willingness to treat all Australians with respect.
Regardless of people’s wealth, race, gender, religion or sexuality, they deserve equal regard from their elected representatives.
That includes single mothers.
That’s why it is so disappointing that the One Nation Party has launched yet another attack on single mothers for cheap political gain.
This week it emerged that a One Nation candidate in the WA election, David Archibald, wrote an essay in Quadrant in 2015 in which he said single mothers had made “a lifestyle choice’’ and that they were “too lazy to attract and hold a mate’’.
He went on to denigrate the children of single mothers, saying they were causing an increase in the number of people who were “lazy and ugly’’.
One would have thought that a leader of a serious political party would have responded to these comments by distancing the party from a man who should be a former candidate.
But when One Nation founder Pauline Hanson was challenged on these comments, she doubled down by tweeting: “To all the fat lazy politicians & fat lazy journalists in the fat lazy media playing fat lazy, PC, identity politics - the answer is no”.
Ms Hanson and Mr Archibald ought to learn to respect their fellow Australians.
There’s something very wrong about an Australia in which politicians seek election to represent the community by vilifying its most vulnerable citizens.
Top Comments
One Nation is irrelevant. Well, in the intelligent states. Do we need to give them air time?
Yes, the Left doesn't do debates and arguments anymore, they just declare anyone who disagrees with them to be stupid and deplorable.
How's that been working out for you?
Yeah, it's a difficult question. Do we flush these idiot candidates out and expose them to the public and risk giving them publicity? Or do we ignore them? In one sense, not giving the idiots and undesirables like that candidate oxygen and attention is a good thing.
But in another, to quote a recent controversial Australian of The Year - the standard you walk past, is the standard you accept. If we don't call them out, then they think they can get away with it. These people need to be exposed to ridicule and shamed. But what is the point, if the very leader of the party, who is supposed to act like a Leader, refuses to chastise them but instead supports them and the comments - something which is absolutely unthinkable that any Australian Leader would do that? Instead of being howled down in shame, they're supported by their so-called 'leader', and thus not chastised.
In short: I honestly don't know what the answer is anymore. People are no longer normal, decent human beings. People no longer have morals. Ironically, it is the so-called 'Conservatives' that are abandoning morals and Christianity for rudeness, incivility and dog-eat-dog beep-you-I'm-right-jack atmosphere. Only two decades ago, people like him would have become a pariah in society, and very rightly so. Now, they are celebrated. The new normal is good = bad, bad = good. There is no common morals or human decency in society anymore. People are so nasty and unkind. So full of hate. So, how do we approach repulsive people like him in an upside down society where people's morals are for sale depending on what side of politics they are? This is uncharted territory.
Single unmarried mothers.The fall back topic on a slow day for right wing shock jocks and their foaming froth of indignation listeners