That’s how one high profile woman responded when I asked her to join the Q&A panel. “I’d be terrified and I’d be terrible” she said, even though she’s addressed boardrooms and parliaments and is easily one of the smartest women I’ve met.
And she’s not alone. I’m not outing anyone here — you all know who you are — but I’ve invited countless erudite and eloquent women onto the show, who’ve declined, dripping with apologies and self-doubt, quick to suggest other women, but just “Not me, oh God, not me!” Some of them are the very women who call for more female voices in public life. On the other hand, week after week I field relentless calls and emails from men, young and old, bristling with confidence and badgering for a spot.
So, what’s going on? Some women tell me the show is too combative, too adversarial. Many admit they’re hopelessly polite. Brilliant listeners, not interrupters. But these are sharp witty women who love to talk and have me in stitches on the phone. The problem is, as Ray Martin so neatly puts it, “Q&A can feel “blokey”.
Watch: A question posed to one Q&A panel as to whether women should go into politics. Post continues after video.
In part, that’s a reflection of Australia’s political culture. Q&A is designed to give people direct access to their political representatives, and with the gender imbalance in Parliament and the chronic shortage of senior female politicians, it’s tough for us to get the balance right. It’s made worse by the fact that politicians (mostly men) usually receive more airtime than non-politicians (often women).
The Ray Martin/Shaun Brown editorial review is a well-researched and thoughtful analysis of six months of Q&A. It found that there were “fewer female panelists and those that were selected were asked fewer questions and permitted far less time to speak”. The end result: Female voices have become sidelined, and therefore diminished in the political conversation. That’s the bad news.