There are many perennial stories on television news services. Every year, we bring you yarns about bog snorkelling, tomato throwing or cheese rolling. Perhaps the most popular is the strange places babies are born: in a tree to avoid floodwaters, in a gallery as performance art, or on the floor of a bathroom at McDonald’s.
Well, I’m about to become the story by giving birth on set. An elbow is sticking out of my stomach. Like John Hurt in Alien, it’s going to be messy. And like Uma Thurman in Pulp Fiction, it involves adrenaline. But there’s no need for a shot to the heart because this rush is natural.
The contractions come during an interview with the prime minister in the lead-up to the 2004 poll. For political journos, election campaigns are like footy finals. According to John Howard, this one’s about trust (same as in 1917, 1937, 1943, 1951, 1972, 1977, 1984, 1987 and 1996).
‘Who do you better trust to keep living standards high and the economy strong?’ he asks voters. ‘Who do you better trust to keep your interest rates low? Who do you better trust to lead Australia in the fight against the peril of international terrorism? Who do you better trust to keep the budget strong and in surplus so that we can better afford to spend more on health and education and defence?’
It’s a hard row to hoe after he’s accused of lying about the ‘children overboard’ affair. A former government adviser says he told Howard there was no evidence of asylum seekers throwing their kids into the sea, despite these allegations helping the Coalition to victory in 2001. (Tampa, September 11, border protection, you get the drift.)
Top Comments
For me ... most medical professionals start their sentences with "because of your weight"...
Funny, if I had the same medical issue as a "slimmer" person, I'd probably be getting "it's just something that can happen from time to time", but if you're bigger it's ALWAYS because of your weight LOL
Medical professionals say insensitive things all the time. I had an orthopaedic surgeon tell me (just moments after he had told me at 36 I would be needing total hip replacements on both sides) that "...you are like a boulder sitting on top of a mountain and the only thing holding you there is twigs and leaves".......I paid my $300 consult bill and spent the next hour crying in my car.
The hip and thigh bones carry around most of your body mass. If those structures are compromised, their ability to hold you up can potentially fail, and disastrously so. The physics of that is pretty much impossible to explain without bringing weight and size into the discussion, because it's the stress of the weight the bones are bearing that causes the fracture to occur. Your surgeon may have been blunt in his choice of words, but the topic of the effect weight and size has on weight-bearing structures is unavoidable in this context.
Thanks for that. For the record I was 1.71cm and 68kg at the time. I have a genetic issue with my hips, it was not related to size/weight.
You're not following me. Many people - you included, by the sounds - assume that when a doctor is talking about weight, they're saying you're fat. If the structural integrity of your hips was weak (for whatever reason), carrying around your weight - even if it was within normal range - *is* akin to being a boulder on top of a mountain with comparatively flimsy objects keeping it all from falling down.