Gay, straight, bisexual, bondage, hardcore, lesbian, MILF, college and more I cannot bring myself to write.
It’s porn and, if you were keen enough and had the fortitude of a thousand bulls, you could download thousands upon thousands of gigabytes of it right now from the Internet. Some of it manufactured by studios, some made by your regular citizens in front of a webcam for nothing but the sheer delight of performing for a world filled with voyeurs.
Welcome to the land of porn: the mega industry that’s hijacking our sexuality according to author Gail Dines. Her book Pornland takes a look into the seedy underworld of porn – I mean, every last detail of some pretty surprising sex acts – in the name of research. Let’s take a look:
“Although we are surrounded by pornographic images, many people are not aware of just how cruel and violent the industry is today. PORNLAND shows how today’s porn is strikingly different from yesterday’s Playboy and Penthouse magazines— how competition in the industry and consumer desensitization have pushed porn toward hard core extremes.”
There are legitimate arguments that Dines makes. Porn, for the most part, is unequal. It’s mostly (but not exclusively) geared toward straight men and shows women as sexual objects. Dines argues that for an industry that has become the de facto sexual education program in America (and elsewhere), it’s planting the wrong message in young boys’ minds from the get-go. After all, many have watched hours of sex with absolute strangers before they ever cop a feel for the first time in reality.
And it’s not the kind of shy, awkward sex you (usually) get with your first time and therefore not much of a beacon of reality.
But it gets worse. Gail argues that the ‘vanilla flavour’ porn of the industry boom in the 1970s is now so passe. You want a straight man and a straight woman having normal sex? Wow, the 20th Century called and wants its sexual predilections back.
Porn smashed the ‘crass ceiling’ when fast Internet speeds took off and it desensitized the hardcore users. Now, as Gail argues, porn voyeurs are searching for more and more content that pushes the boundaries. Anal sex? So yesterday. Gail highlighted sex acts like ‘ATM’ (no, not the bank version, it’s also an acronym for Arse-To-Mouth whereby the man has anal and then oral sex with a woman immediately afterwards, causing some unsavoury health implications for her), violent sex, double and triple penetration and even beastiality as the new ‘norm’.
Top Comments
Wow. So after reading these comments, I feel like the luckiest woman alive.
My partner is one of the sweetest, gentlest men I have ever met. He is kind to me, and so supportive of my needs, particularly as someone who was sexually assaulted by a previous boyfriend.
The truth is, my partner watches porn, and does so not infrequently. But I would never think of him as a sex-crazed person, or an addict. And the porn he watches is for the most part couples on youporn.com, so pretty tame really.
I agree with a lot of what Gail Dines has to say, but I also live in a world where not every man is a rapist waiting to happen. My problem with her book, is the complete lack of nuance in her thesis. Not every act of porn is violent, not every man wants to see women maimed by sex.
I think if we cannot distinguish between acts of couples filming themselves and big-business hardcore porn, then we are doing ourselves, and our male friends and family, a disservice.
One thing that really disturbs me is that there just doesn't seem to be the understanding of the effect of engaging in the degrading and painful sexual acts on female actresses in porn. You only have to read the tread to get an idea of how awful some of the things they participate in while making porn. The making of some types of porn can be cruel and dehumanising. any fleeting pleasure you feel watching this porn cannot be justified. When you watch violent degrading porn it may be a fantasy for you but what about the actress? How do you think they felt after being in a violent scene ? Would you want your son or daughter to be in that type of porn?
I remember watching a documentary on child pornography and all of the people that had watched child pornography said that they didn't believe that the images were of children really having sex. They thought that they were computer manipulated images. But all of the images were of children who had been kidnapped or sold into the sex industry.
People may want to rationalise that actresses that make violent porn bear no ill effects, but I think the reality is that it damages people.
Iv read the occasional article and honest interview with porn stars that talks about the physical injuries the workers commonly suffer - mostly things like regular urinary tract infections and also permanent damage like rectal incontinence from all the anal work they are obliged to do. Apparently double and even triple penetration that is now pretty standard for any starlet who wants to be successful in the industry.
While some consumers of porn might argue they do it in a healthy way, there is nothing healthy about the way it is produced.
This is not an argument against porn - it is an argument against THE PRODUCTION of certain sorts of porn. There is already more than enough porn that has already been made, so we really don't need to ever make any more porn again. Then there is fantasy stories, cartoons, animations, amateur porn etc.
So concern for the actors is an important and under-rated concern, but not an argument against the promulgation of porn.