It’s been eight months since Man Haron Monis held 18 hostages for 16 hours in Sydney’s Lindt café.
And top of that list is this: How is it that this man could have been afforded the opportunity to do this? Why wasn’t this man already in prison?
After all, the self-described cleric was very well-known to police. The inquest heard that Monis was on bail for penning vile letters to the families of dead Australian soldiers seven years ago when he committed three sexual offences, and he was on bail when the murder he was charged with being an accessory to was committed.
At the time of the attack that shocked the nation, Monis had an astonishing 43 sexual assault charges against him, made by at least six different women. This included: 22 counts of aggravated sexual assault and 14 counts of aggravated indecent assault, among others.
So why on earth was this man walking free? And why were sexual assault charges and one charge of accessory to murder deemed insufficient to put this violent man behind bars and keep him there?
Read about how the siege tragically ended here.
The inquest has heard a series of blunders involving police and prosecutors meant the court was never told Monis was on bail for the Commonwealth offences when the sex offences were committed. And that a letter drafted by homicide police to the DPP requesting his bail on the murder-related charge be revoked was never sent.
The DPP solicitor never opposed bail and Monis was allowed to walk free two months before the deadly siege.
The fact of the matter is that men who commit atrocious acts of violence against women are still given far too lenient treatment. Time and again, our courts fail the community – and women in particular – by failing to take a strong stance on these crimes.