I always wanted to get married and have children.
When heterosexual people become serious in a relationship, there’s a natural curiosity about whether marriage and children are in the couple’s future. Our society has an old and established way of recognising those relationships and when a heterosexual couple wants that kind of recognition, they get married. Unfortunately, this is still not an option for same-sex couples in Australia.
Around the world, we now have cultural images of gays and lesbians creating families in various ways. In 2008 my partner and I decided we wanted to have children. As a lawyer, I was quite surprised by the number of special laws governing lesbian families and the ignorance around those laws. I was also struck by the fact that there were few resources available to Australian lesbians interested in marriage and children. I became more passionate about the law and began working with lesbians seeking legal advice in my professional life.
Although we know that “love makes a family”, I also know that the law is an incredibly powerful force in how we make and maintain those families as lesbians.
The law in Australia has slowly evolved to recognise same-sex couples as de facto partners and to recognise both mothers on their child’s birth certificate. But the fact that same-sex couples still can’t marry in Australia tells us that our relationships and our children are still not accepted by society. It also invalidates our children’s view of their own family structure. It’s time for change. It’s 2017. What is “normal” anymore?
Top Comments
This is actually the single biggest strategic reason I think many non custodial fathers will vote yes. Lesbian relationships have the highest rate of breakdown of all types of 2 party intimate relationships. With homosexual relationships having the lowest rate. Inevitably thru the shear power of demographics many non biological female partners who have lost custody of their children will lobby thru the all powerful feminist influence it holds over government to award equal 50/50 custody of any children resultant of that relationship by default. In this paradigm the courts will be hard pressed to stave of logical popular assumption that if a non biological party has a legally recognized & enforced claim on custody of children, then why not biological fathers as well from traditional relationships also. Nice trojan horse hey ladies?
Are you just here to be contrary and argumentative, Richard? Omnipotent feminist conspiracy theories abound! Keep waving that MRA flag with vigour!
I still have not heard one intelligent argument from the 'no' side. It's all either hate, bigotry or arguments that have zero to do with marriage.