This week in the Daily Telegraph, Louise Roberts wrote an opinion piece: ‘Why I‘m not ashamed of sending my kids to private school.’ Within the piece she stated that: “We only have one chance to give our sons and daughters the best education we can source and afford.”
Roberts says, for her, this is why she decides to send her children to a private school.
And to an extent, I agree with Roberts – we do only have one chance to give our children the best education we can source and afford – and this is exactly why I send my daughter to a government school.
Because money doesn’t mean “the best.”
Education is not, nor should it be, based around money. Education is greater than that – far greater.
Viewing it this way is a fundamental cause of the multitude of issues within the Australian educational system today and makes this divide or battle between the “private school brats” and “ordinary kids” Roberts’ references, even wider and more “noxious.”
Gabbie Stroud tells Mia Freedman why she broke up with teaching. Post continues below.
As a public school educated woman myself, both at primary and secondary school levels, I received an ATAR of 90, I went to a top Melbourne University and academically I did well.
Some of my classmates have gone on to be doctors, engineers, teachers, nurses, paramedics, tradespeople, business owners and artists.
They are doing what they are passionate about and they enjoy it.
Our secondary school wasn’t selective. It wasn’t considered the type of high school that people move suburbs or neighbourhoods to be a part of the zone for.
Top Comments
Private schools have more resources, thats the main difference. They can pay teachers more, run classes with smaller numbers, and have elaborate sporting and arts facilities. None of these things guarantee better academic outcomes or better outcomes in any areas for individual children. What parents pay for are the greater number of options for their kids.
I changed to an exclusive private school in year 11 because they had a fully functioning theatre, and I wanted to do theatre design. They could also accommodate the exact subjects I wanted to do for the HSC. The public school I left was certainly more 'excellent', regularly ranking in the top 3 in NSW. But because it was so streamlined to academic results, I was going to have to change 3 or my arts subjects to maths and sciences. I would probably have gotten an ATAR over 99 if I stayed there. But I didn't need a high ATAR, I wanted to develop a portfolio. As it was, I got 98.7 at the school I changed to while studying the things I wanted, which was a higher mark than they had ever had at that expensive school.
Money doesn't equal excellence or better outcomes at all. The private school was a good choice for me at the time. I would never send my daughters there because its old fashioned and sexist. But I wouldn't send them to the public school I went to either, because its myopic and unhealthy. Theres no single 'type' of school that works better for every student.
Networking is what the elite private schools excel at. That is their forte, not their academia. Old School Tie goes a long way, look at the dunces in Govt.
Can we just clarify that religious schools are not private schools? They are public schools - with religion. Despite there being no evidence to support sending children there instead of public schools, parents continue to send their children to faith-based schools in droves so they can label it ‘private.’ Even if it means their child starts life as a complete hypocrite in having to do a quickie baptism in order to get in, or pretend in class they believe. Even though faith-based schools are really only about getting more bums on pews and more believers than about childrens’ education. I just don’t get today’s parents at all. They have no integrity and their children won’t either.
Even the most underfunded public school has more dignity than any of those cheap religious schools.
Yep.
I have moved to a regional area where the options are private, religious school and just one actually private school. So many people think they are going ‘private’ by going to a (mostly) catholic school and that it actually makes a difference. They have larger class sizes and spend 45 min each day teaching religion (and don’t make up for lost time) - yet they still think it’s superior 🤷🏻♀️
My kids go to a low fee Catholic school. They aren't baptised, I'm not religious. The school has students of mixed race and religion. Some refugees. Several with disabilities. Kids who are in foster care. Kids who have abuse in their past. Kids from broken families, some with protection orders. The school is small.
When choosing a school I looked at many, public and private, religious and not.
The things that stood out to me on tours were.
The principal knew every kid by name. As we walked around there were a lot of micro interactions between him and the kids which were organic and happy.
The school was clean and well organised but not sterile. Classrooms were full of decentralized stimulation.
The kids were happy and engaged.
The parent group was happy and welcoming.
Anti bullying policy was honest and open, acknowledging the challenges.
Technology was used to enhance learning, not as the centre.
I'm not religious, however I see the value in my kids receiving religious education as it will allow them to better relate to people who are.
At the end of the day this school was the one that I felt most comfortable with. It's a huge decision as a parent. You feel like you have this one opertunity to make the right choice in something that will effect your child's whole life. Don't judge people for their choices. They are all trying to make the best choice for their kids.
BTW. I am very happy with the choice I've made. After getting to know their teachers I feel like my kids are in a very good environment. I have no regrets or feelings of second guessing the decision.