By KATE HUNTER
Former Prime Minister and elder statesman of the Australian Labor Party, Bob Hawke suggested on the weekend that Tanya Plibersek shouldn’t be considered a frontrunner to lead the party because she has small children.
Actually, he didn’t suggest it – he came right out and said it.
Tanya was the Minister for Health in the former Government and has become very popular amongst voters after feisty performances on current affairs shows like Q and A. She is the mother of three children. Her youngest, Louis, is two and a half.
Now, I accept that Bob Hawke knows a hundred times more about politics and its demands than most of us ever will. He’s entitled to say what he likes and speculate about the impact of having a young family on a politician’s career.
But it’s what he didn’t say that has irked.
Namely, that there was no mention that Bill Shorten (who will announce his candidacy for the ALP leadership today) also has a young family. His daughter Clementine is three.
You’d think by now we’d have moved beyond this debate. Surely it’s accepted that a woman can do her job well and still care for her kids. That the impact of children on a person’s career shouldn’t be determined by gender.
You’d also think, in this age of dads cutting umbilical cords, enjoying paternity leave and watching ‘House Husbands’ that their responsibilities at home might come into play a teeny-tiny bit in the way they approach work – and the way employers relate to them.
My husband tells me that when he’s been interviewed for jobs, the question – ‘So, do you have kids?’ only comes up in a chatty, social way, ‘Really? I have a boy the same age! Does yours play cricket?’
Kids and their care are rarely issues for men in the workplace.
When a woman gets a new job, the kid question is there, omnipresent.
The child-shaped elephant in the room.
And if she doesn’t have kids, the question often floats unspoken… why doesn’t she have kids? What if she suddenly chooses to have kids?
Is she likely to bail out of the workforce and need to be replaced soon? And if she doesn’t want them – well why not? Is she a little unstable? A bit hard-hearted? Unfeminine, even?
When I was younger (about the time Bob Hawke was Prime Minister) , I used to argue about this with my father. He believed that the ‘maternal instinct’ was more powerful than the ‘paternal instinct,’ so it was easier for men to be away from their children for long periods.
He’d get into the whole hunter-gatherer thing and I’d storm into my room, yelling, ‘So why are you bothering to educate me anyway?’
Thankfully, my father was never in parliament.