It was a hot summer afternoon and Rosie’s eleven year old son, Luke, was playing in the cricket nets with his father, Greg Anderson.
Without warning and with Rosie waiting nearby, Anderson beat Luke with a bat and stabbed him to death with a knife. Anderson was later shot dead by police.
Today, Coroner Ian Gray said that Greg Anderson was “solely responsible” for the death of his son, Luke Batty.
It seems like an understated and perhaps obvious finding from a Coronial inquiry that has gone on for almost a year.
The Coroner called Luke’s death a “tragic loss of a young life full of promise”. But after sifting through thousands of pages of evidence, Ian Gray said, “no-one could have predicted Anderson would kill his son”:
“I conclude, based on the comprehensive evidence in this case, that Luke’s death was not reasonably foreseeable by any entity or person, including Ms Batty,” said Ian Gray.
Despite identifying “gaps or flaws” in the family violence system, Gray said, “I find that none of the actions of the organisations or persons whose conduct has been analysed either singularly or in combination caused or directly contributed to Luke’s death.”
In short, the Coroner Gray was saying: no one will be held accountable for the death of Luke Batty.
It may be that, legally, no one can be held accountable for Luke’s death.
But there is something that must come out of this nightmare.
When Rosie Batty gave her evidence to the Coroner, she said that no one ever tried to stop Anderson, and that when she asked for help, she was offered counselling rather than protection.
“I wanted support. I wanted other people to step in to make some decisions so it wasn’t just me facing Greg… The only suggestion they have is to have counselling,” she told the court.