[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGOohBytKTU&hl=en_GB&fs=1&]
Have you been having sex with the same person for more than a year? Then you need to know this: there’s a 90 percent chance that you and your partner won’t have tried anything new in bed after your first-sex anniversary. Not even one teeny thing. And once you’re past the two-year mark? It’s almost certain the two of you will never try anything new in bed again. Never. Again.
That’s the startling sex news from psychologist, sexpert and author of the book Sizzling Sex, Dr Pam Spurr who interviewed more than 400 couples to confirm what many people already knew: variety may be the spice of life but not really of monogamy.
Dr Spur explained to The Times online, “I’ve come to call this the “two-year turn-off” because many partners find their uninspiring sex life does just that. There’s often little motivation to have anything more than infrequent sex, which can cause relationships to flounder.”
And since women are usually the gatekeepers of sex in a relationship, the losers in the infrequent sex situation are most often men. A few months ago, I was reading a book which discussed this exact subject in one chapter.
Nigel Marsh is an Australian advertising executive at the highest level and the author of two highly amusing books. The first is Fat, Forty and Fired about the year he spent being all three of those adjectives. His second book, Confessions Of A Very Short Man is a collection of his musings on life, many inspired by letters he received after book one. There were thousands of those letters, most of them from men.
One popular theme was sex frequency. Or the disappointing lack of it. Letters arrived from men who loved their partners but felt permanently sexually frustrated. Men who said their partners never initiated sex, instead, they ‘dispensed’ it. Men who described themselves as “overworked and underlaid”.
Top Comments
Husband and I must be the odd ones out... he works so much that stress keeps his sex drive down, while I'm raring to go most of the time. BUT, when we do have sex, it's awesome - we try new things constantly. No point letting it get boring, there is a wonderful world of kink out there! I guess it helps that we don't have particularly 'vanilla' desires to begin with... 7 years together, 2 married, and I reckon the sex got better after the wedding.
I guess I will preface this statement with a confession of sorts "I'm bit of a radical feminist" - what I want to know is why are women STILL responsible for meeting men's supposed insatiable needs for sex? Why are women who might be experiencing lower sex drives then their partners pathologised as if there is something wrong with them? Maybe low sex drive for some women is actually a NORMAL part of being a woman and perhaps men need to accept this rather than keep banging on (no pun intended) about women having to meet men where they are at sexually. God didn't give men two hands just so he could pick up tools. Instead of women running themselves a bath, having a glass of wine & lighting a few candles 'to get in the mood' why don't blokes take this suggestion, lock the bathroom door & DIY. Women should be able to have as much or as little sex as they like.
As a feminist myself, I have to respectfully disagree with this comment. Relationships require compromise. If you, as a woman, are constantly denying your partner/husband sex -- which is something I'm quite guilty of -- then you are denying them something fundamental to their sense of well being and fulfillment within the relationship. I could go months without sex with my partner. It certainly wasn't always this way. I do recall, at various points in my late 20s and early 30s, having a very healthy libido, but that's all a distant memory now.
The point is, if I made a stand as a feminist and said, 'Sorry, buddy, I just don't feel like it. Ever. And if you don't like it, tough.' Where does that leave him? My partner needs sex and likes it to have it regularly. I aim to have sex with him once a week, give or take. That's one too many times for me and still not nearly enough times for him, but at least this 'compromise' brings some harmony to the relationship. Although 'the sex thing' is still an issue with us. I have no idea why sex is so unappealing to me at this stage in my life, but if all my partner hears is 'no, no, no' then all I'm being is selfish and thoughtless and my refusals certainly don't make me a feminist. There are more important battles than this one for me to take a 'feminist stance' on.