It’s been eight years since Heath Ledger‘s tragic passing in January 2008. Leaving behind a loving family and a two-year-old daughter Matilda (now 10), the years have been defined by distance for the star’s loved ones.
The vast space that separates Heath’s parents and sister, who reside in Perth, from the late actor’s little girl, living in New York, has proven difficult. According to the family, young Matilda is the spitting image of their lost son.
“She’s such a reminder of her Dad,” Sally told The Daily Telegraph this week.
“Matilda is exactly like her dad, she looks just like him,” added dad Kim.
Top Comments
It says "But the close-knit family try ensure they see Matilda wherever possible, by making numerous round trips to New York to visit her". Heath lived in the US with Michelle and Matilda, not here, in close proximity to his family. Why do you assume his family saw them any more then, than they do now? It doesn't sound like Michelle would ever keep Matilda from Heath's family, so what exactly is the complaint??
He would have travelled back to see his family with his daughter. So that would most likely double the amount they would have seen her
Well......you don't actually know that and like the article says Matilda is now in school and Michelle works so that would be difficult to do now!
You don't know that he wouldn't have. And I wasn't talking about Michelle, you mentioned if his family saw her more when Heath was alive...geeze!
You don't know that he would have. And in my original statement - which you commented on - I was addressing the article........geeze!
Mmmm. I guess there are people in Australia whose nearest relatives are living in refugee camps on the border between Kenya and Somalia. I guess they don't have the means to make several round trips a year to visit their rellos. Is this article asking us to sympathise with these wealthy people? If so, perhaps they should queue for sympathy behind 2.9999 billion other people in hardship terms.