
When I was ten years old, my primary school did “underwear checks” on the girls. You lined up and hitched up a corner of your dress discreetly in front of a female teacher. Your knickers, you see, were expected to be the official school colour. It was the school’s way of helping to deter the boys from looking up our dresses, I suppose. Nothing to see here, boys! Just regulation navy undies!
Does it sound weird? It was.
But as girls our dignity was paramount and well, let’s face it, wearing a dress came with issues. Back then I cautiously climbed open staircases where boys lingered underneath. And every little lunch and big lunch our games were just naturally tempered by the unspoken rule that at all times we must be careful to keep our dresses down. Looking back it was the first time I got the message that how I looked as a girl – what I wore – was prioritised over what I could do.
That was in the early 80s.
Some schools have gone so far as to request that girls lengthen their skirts to avoid attention. Post continues after video.
Over 30 years later and it’s disheartening to see that in some schools little has changed.
The underwear checks may be history but it’s shocking to me that some schools continue to insist on forcing girls – not boys, just girls – to wear clothing designed to impede their movement and relegate them to a duller, more passive playground experience. All based on what? The outdated, inherently sexist notion that girls belong in dresses.
Top Comments
This issue is an utter joke.
There are bigger issues than this going on in Catholic education. What about the church's overall treatment of women, which trickles down to the girls in their schools? This instution does not respect women. Yet parents are flocking to their schools.
When are people going to realise that any money paid to that institution, whether it is via a Catholic education, a Catholic Church wedding or directly to the Church, contributes to the continued treatment of Catholic women, especially in third world countries, as second-class citizens? It is like contributing financially to the Mafia.
While you complain about girls not being able to wear pants at their Catholic school, the Catholic Church continues to threaten and influence politics against allowing same-sex marriage, whilst simultaneously avoiding accountability for the fallout on thousands of lives caused by the sexual abuse by priests of children. This coincides with the Pope just announcing that he 'may' consider 'allowing' women to be deacons in the Church, a lower rank than bishop. Do everyday Catholics think this has nothing to do with them?
Instead of whingeing about your girls in Catholic schools having to wear skirts, a very first world Catholic school girl problem, why not use your dollars to protest your institution not addressing policy that causes real misery and poverty to thousands upon thousands of people. I don't really care about your girls having to wear skirts, whilst girls in the Philippines and Haiti are told by priests that abortion and contraception are a sin.
I totally agree with the issues raised about the catholic church
But instead of knocking this woman, we should celebrate her, a small step is still a step, a small highlight of how sexist it is, is still a good highlight
This story may have got some looking deeper
I don't know where I sit with this. On one hand I believe that following school rules helps prepare kids for adulthood as workplaces have rules that we have to follow and then of course we have laws that we must obey in order to live in a civilised society. On the other hand I agree that boys and girls should be given the option of wearing what they're comfortable in. I guess, I take the opinion that if it's the schools rules, then it's the rules.