
The entertainment news world is abuzz with reports that Charlie Sheen will announce in a matter of hours that he is the unnamed Hollywood actor with HIV that has been making headlines of late.
The unnamed actor was rumoured to have been hiding his HIV-positive diagnosis from sexual partners for around two years.
According to celebrity gossip site TMZ, the 50-year-old actor will claim his HIV is “undetectable” due to medication and so he did not knowingly deceive any sexual partners because blood tests couldn’t reveal the presence of the disease.
Gawker – Report: Virus Undetectable in HIV Positive Charlie Sheen After Treatment https://t.co/Iw8AZvjG3p
— Silber World News (@SilberWorldNews) November 17, 2015
So what does this actually mean?
Victorian AIDS Council Chief Executive Simon Ruth said most people diagnosed with HIV these days and treated will achieve an undetectable status, which means testing will no longer pick up the virus.
They won’t be cured; they will always have the virus, but they will likely not infect others.
“We imagine by these comments Sheen is referring to ‘undetectable viral load’,” Mr Ruth said.
Related: Charlie Sheen is reportedly the “a-list Hollywood actor” with HIV.
“Having an undetectable viral load does not mean that a person is not HIV-positive, and it does not mean that they are free of HIV.
“However, a person living with HIV on effective antiretroviral treatment can have HIV in their system at levels below current methods of detection (less than 20 copies of the virus per mL of blood). We refer to this as having an ‘undetectable viral load’.
Top Comments
Yeah, I'd still want to know if someone had HIV before I slept with them. Even if they do have an undetectable viral load, it's still my choice to make. I don't know that much about HIV - maybe someone here could enlighten me - but surely your status could change over time? If it's possible to go from an undetectable viral load to a detectable one, there must be a risk of passing it on to others?
Totally concur. It is a despicable thing to not inform potential sexual partners of any disease that will have life-changing consequences for anyone infected. Herpes falls into this category, though it's not generally as severe, but the medical care, treatments, future health problems, family plans, entire life is affected by becoming infected, however much things have improved (and of course they have, dramatically). I'd be beyond furious if anyone knowingly exposed me to infection.
Most people who are living with HIV have three monthly viral load tests (HIV drugs come as a 3 month script and s100 doctors do these tests before writing the next script). If you have achieved a long term undetectable viral load and keep taking medication its unlikely that that you would become detectable.
On the other hand Caroline have you considered that people living with HIV have had to go through all the life changing consequences you list on top of this they suffer violence, stigma and discrimination due to their status.
When a person living with HIV does inform a potential partner they are usually rejected out of hand, sometimes abusively and violently. One of the worst cases I am aware of was a young guy called Phillipe Flores who was asked home by a bouncer in a gay pub. On the way home he disclosed he was HIV positive and the reaction of his potential partner was to kick him to death so violently that his liver was cleaved in two. Phillipe was a lovely guy; that makes me beyond furious also
Thanks for explaining, Cameron. I think this is a situation which involves a lot of trust between people - you would have to trust that the HIV positive partner is responsible enough to keep up with their meds etc.