“My words were taken out of context.”
That’s the defence you will get from almost anyone who has said something controversial when they are faced with the fury of the masses.
This week, it was Australian boxer Anthony Mundine, who used the tired trope to excuse the claims he made about the benefits of the Koran’s stance on violence against women.
Just so you do have context, here it is:
While appearing on Mark Latham’s YouTube show Outsiders alongside Ben Fordham, the trio were discussing Yassmin Abdel-Magied’s now-infamous Anzac Day tweet.
The men moved onto a broader discussion of Islam and its merits as a “feminist religion”, as Abdel-Magied previously described it while appearing on Q&A in February.
During the discussion, Latham quoted Mundine a verse from the Koran, “…men are in charge of women. Good women are therefore obedient. For women who might disobey, it’s recommended to admonish them, leave them alone in their sleeping places and then beat them.”
“That doesn’t sound very feminist,” Latham said to his Muslim co-panellist.
And that’s when Mundine made this statement: “it’s not a term [that refers to] to beat [but] as to hit.”
“In the Koran, you know what a beating is? You know the Arab toothbrush? Little stick. That is a beating. But you cannot harm the lady, cause any injury or any bruising,” he said while pretending to lightly tap Latham’s arm.
Top Comments
So it's okay to 'beat' your wife with a little stick so it doesn't cause bruising? Sounds the same as 'smacking' a child with a cane. The intent is to cause punishment and to enforce obedience through fear.
How would Anthony Mundine feel if someone tried to 'beat' him with a little stick if he didn't do what they told him to do, in his own home?
If Mark Latham is defending women against something you have said...I think you have a serious problem Mundine.