news

The bill has passed: Aussies will get to vote on the Voice to Parliament later this year.

Aussies will get to vote on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, with the Senate passing the legislation to hold a referendum later this year. 

The law to enable the referendum was passed 52 to 19 on Monday, with the Senate setting out the proposed constitutional change, should the referendum be successful.

The proposed Voice to Parliament would be an independent body that would advise the parliament and government on the views of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples on matters that affect them.

The vote means Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will set a date for the referendum, which must be held in the next two to six months. 

The government has already flagged it would take place between October and December.

Co-chair of the Uluru Dialogue Megan Davis said the bill passing was a historic moment.

"We're closer to a referendum to finally give First Nations Peoples a chance to be heard," Prof Davis said.

"This is the recognition we've been fighting for and what the vast majority of First Nations People support. The significance of this moment cannot be overstated."

Paul Ramsay Foundation Chief First Nations Officer Michelle Steele said there was a feeling of excitement and optimism among 'yes' campaigners.

"This is an opportunity for us to really demonstrate that we are committed to this country, this is our country," she told AAP.

"I want to say to broader Australia, please just listen to us and that's the most important thing about the Voice.

"Some details might come later but it is a really a great opportunity for us to share this love of country."

While the coalition has spoken out against the Indigenous voice, most senators voted to set up the referendum to allow the public to have their say.

Liberal senator Michaelia Cash told parliament while she voted for the referendum bill, she described the Indigenous Voice as "risky, unknown and divisive".

Meanwhile, independent senator Lidia Thorpe said it would be "tokenistic" and would not address issues impacting Indigenous people.

"Happy assimilation day, everybody. Many clans and nations around this country do not support assimilating into such a racist, colonial regime and we will continue to push for our sovereignty to be acknowledged," she said.

Labor senator Murray Watt said the significance of the day was as "big as Uluru".

Some coalition members were designated to vote against the bill, in order to allow them to outline arguments for a 'no' vote in pamphlets that will be sent out to all Australian households.

Among those who voted 'no' in the chamber was opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie.

More to come.

Read more:

The question for the 'Voice to Parliament' Referendum has been revealed.

Another politician quits: What it means now the Liberal Party said they don't support the Voice to Parliament.

- With AAP. 

Feature Image: AAP.

Calling All Skincare Enthusiasts! Complete this short survey now and go in the running to win one of four $50 gift vouchers!

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

snorks a year ago 1 upvotes
Absolutely this should go to a referendum. 
I'm not sure how the vote in November (or whenever) will go though. 
I just can't get behind the idea of separating people by race is a good way to get equality. 
gu3st a year ago 1 upvotes
@snorks If you were sitting on the other side of the fence, where your health, educational, professional and social outcomes are already practically separated by race, you might see the difference a little more starkly and see the chance for more equal outcomes as not so much an intellectual exercise, but an imperative.

This isn't a trivial debate along ideological lines just because politicians and certain media outlets have spun it to be so, it's about addressing real, consistent disadvantage along racial lines. The calls of 'we need more detail' and 'it's bound to be effective', or the more perniciously innaccurate  'mainstream australia will cede "constitutional" control due to the voice' attempt to obfuscate, but don't dilute the real, racially separate need for the attempt to be made.
snorks a year ago
@gu3st I'm well aware of all the issues. I see them every day. 

Improvement is an imperative, the way we go about it is up for debate.

We've already spent billions of dollars and will continue to do so. 
draculasgirlfriend a year ago
@snorks it's not doing that, though. Not really. It's more like trying to make things more even1!!!!!!!
I don't know if it will go through, but I think there is a lot of misinformation going around. It is a step in the right direction!!!!!!
From the Conversation:
"the Voice is supported under international human rights law as it recognises Indigenous peoples’ rights to political representation and is consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
In human rights and international law, equality and anti-discrimination means more than just treating people exactly the same. Indeed, this type of formal equality will often result in ongoing discrimination against people who have been historically marginalised because it doesn’t redress institutional and structural discrimination, or recognise difference.
The Voice has been endorsed by several UN treaty bodies, which have also expressed serious concern about the human rights violations Indigenous people in Australia continue to experience."
snorks a year ago
@draculasgirlfriend how can putting a group of people in the constitution and giving them access to the decision makers be seen as making things even?
Is it a step in the right direction though?
They already have political representation. 
Do you think that once we achieve equality, people would be happy stripping them from the constitution and eliminating the voice?
Treaties don't exactly have the best record in fixing anything. 
I think NZ is the only one that has shown a positive outcome.