explainer

A euthanised dog and a cancelled adoption: The YouTube couple everyone is talking about.

American family vloggers Nikki and Dan Phillippi are no strangers to controversy.

The Nashville-based Christian influencers have been documenting their lives on the internet, via Nikki's YouTube channel, for 10 years now, amassing 1.7 million followers in the process. 

But earlier this month, the pair became widely known for their decision to put down their nine-year-old dog, Bowser, after he "nipped" at their son's face when he tried to take the dog's food.

Watch: Nikki and Dan explain how their son, Logan, interacted with Bowser. Post continues below.

What happened to Nikki and Dan Phillippi's dog?

On May 4, Nikki and Dan uploaded a video to Nikki's YouTube channel titled: 'We have some really sad news'.

In it, they shared that they had decided to put their bull terrier Bowser down after he nipped their one-year-old son on the face.

Nikki and Bowser. Image: Youtube. 

"It wasn't bad, but Logan still has a little mark," Nikki said of the bite, adding, "It wasn't like Bowser attacked Logan, Logan stole food from him."

The family explained that they had been considering re-homing Bowser before the incident as they were getting ready to move houses and, according to Nikki, "there's a lot that goes into transporting Bowser, and finding a home for him.

"We contacted the humane society and we had a long discussion with someone over there, and she made it clear to us that re-homing him would not be an option because he's been with Dan since birth."

Following the call, the pair kept Bowser.

Throughout the video, the pair explained that their bull terrier couldn't go outside as he was aggressive with other dogs, and they were "waiting for something to happen".

"It got harder the older [their son, Logan] got, because when [Logan] was a baby, Bowser wasn't going to go out of his way to aggress on him... But once he got older and could move, it was Logan in Bowser's space," Nikki said.

"Logan couldn't help but grab at him and try to steal things from him or interrupt him while he's eating or scream at him, so it was almost unfair to Bowser..."

Dan added that Bowser would sleep in the corner and if Logan was "in the mood" he would "grab on" to Bowser, and he would growl, get up and move away.

Image: Instagram. 

Although the incident that lead the couple to their decision was not talked about in great detail, Dan said: "In the moment... I wanted to pick Bowser up by the back of the neck and take him to the backyard and put him down right there."

Following the release of the video, several high-profile YouTubers expressed their discomfort with the couple's decision. 

There are others, however, who say there are issues with rehoming dogs who have a history of biting children. 

Why didn't Nikki and Dan adopt from Thailand?

Days later, a clip of the couple uploaded in 2018 resurfaced, where Nikki and Dan explained their decision to not adopt a child from Thailand.

The couple said they had wanted to adopt, but part way through the process, were made aware of "unique laws" that meant they would not be allowed to share photos or videos of their child online for the first year.

"I mean Nikki's got a YouTube channel and we share a whole lot," Dan said.

"When that hit we literally were like 'Oh what?" Nikki said. "So we were like going round the houses like trying to figure out how this could work like 'Hashtag baby blur face...'

"We're like alright, let's pray about it, let's sleep on it and then let's see how we feel in the morning."

After consulting with family, they decided to stop their application altogether. 

Since receiving backlash for their decisions, Nikki and Dan have turned their Instagram accounts to private and are yet to respond to the criticism.

Other commenters, however, acknowledge that - even for a more private family - it would be difficult to not be able to share photos of a child. Some also said it was a positive that the couple had decided against adoption before they had gone further down the process, rather than going through with it and changing their minds. 

There's one undeniable fact, thought: the lives of YouTubers never cease to keep us entertained.

Feature Image: YouTube

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

laura__palmer 3 years ago 3 upvotes
"and she made it clear to us that re-homing him would not be an option because he's been with Dan since birth."
This sounds like a lie to me. I've given a home successfully to adult dogs who have had to be rehomed, and they had been with their previous owners since birth. I can't imagine anyone from a humane society giving this advice. There would have been plenty of people happy to take the dog and give a go at rehoming him. 
cat 3 years ago
@laura__palmer the RSPCA refused to insure our cat because we were adopting him from a friend of a friend, and they told us they don't support people giving away their pets. So I can imagine some similarly sanctimonious person telling them that. 

But yeah, pets are rehomed all the time when owners move or pass away, its sad but definitely possible. 
rush 3 years ago 3 upvotes
@cat wow, that's a fairly short-sighted, black and white policy, isn't it? What happens to animals owned by an elderly person who can no longer care for themselves, let alone a pet? There are any number of reasons why people may no longer be able to care for an animal, if they can't give them to someone else, then what, is it better to put them to sleep?
cat 3 years ago 1 upvotes
@rush I’ve also seen people abuse other people online for not feeding their dogs a raw meat diet- some animal people are just crazy. 
laura__palmer 3 years ago 1 upvotes
@cat Whoa, I agree with Rush below. That is very shortsighted. 

rush 3 years ago 2 upvotes
Other commenters, however, acknowledge that - even for a more private family - it would be difficult to not be able to share photos of a child.
Really? I know plenty of "more private" people who manage not to share photos of their kids. Could they not have been upfront with their followers and said "we've adopted a child from Thailand, and under their laws, we aren't allowed to post about the child for a year" ? Frankly, I think it's for for best that they didn't adopt this child, I'm sure there are probably a few biological children of these "parenting blogger" types who wish they had the same protections. 

cat 3 years ago
@rush yeah, I cant imagine any other couple that was looking to adopt would even think about this, its a ridiculously low cost compared to getting a child. 
rush 3 years ago
@cat the amount of effort and time and stress that goes into an adoption, especially an overseas adoption, would be huge, not to mention the financial cost. You have to really want to have a child this way, and most parents would move heaven and earth to have a child become part of their family. The fact that these two gave up because they couldn't post photos says a whole lot about who they are.