real life

"I had a baby with the wrong man."

 

 

 

 

 

This post was originally published on Role Reboot  and has been republished here with full permission.

By MAVIS KING

A case for balancing instinct and logic when choosing a partner who will father your children.

I had a baby with the wrong man. It’s as simple as that, and what a terrible mistake it is to have made.

So I warn you, keep your wits about you when considering who will father your children. You need to make a good decision, because you’ll live with it forever.

Years ago as I entered my mid-30s my mother began to talk of Mr Good Enough. The fact that I had not settled into a committed relationship or marriage was assumed to be due to a selection issue on my side. “Are you being too picky?” a colleague inquired when we caught up for lunch.

I never had a list of qualities I desired, no stern non-negotiables were asserted when I began dating someone. I wasn’t seeking wealth or a way of life. I could provide that for myself.

I was after something else. I wanted that feeling, that definitive moment when I just knew the person was the one for me.

As more friends got married and settled into long-term relationships, when even my non-maternal friends, the ones who had never shown interest in children, began to have their own, and when I felt uncomfortable at work functions to state that I was still single, it dawned on me that I may have had it all wrong.

The reality was that I wasn’t living the life I imagined for myself, I thought I would be married with kids by now and instead I was having to come to terms with the possibility that it may never happen.

Suddenly I wondered, should I actually have been making the decision of a partner using my logic? What were my non-negotiables?

By all reports my instinct was failing me. After a series of relationships with great chemistry but not commitment, shared interests but not values, I decided a different approach was needed.

At the encouragement of a friend, I sat down and listed the five values I was looking for in a partner. They were to become my non-negotiables.

That was all OK, but values and checklists are no good without your instinct. I warn you: You need both.

A man walked into my life just as the ink dried on my values and principles list. Tick, tick, tick, tick, and tick—I declared him a match. A PLU (person like us) my mother’s best friend exclaimed. “He’s the one!” declared the wild Irish aunt of a school friend. And he was named after an archangel—perhaps God was on my side.

We had a myriad of connections from school to family and work. By logic it was a fit. However, he harbored a secret, and my suppressed instinct, my desire to just get on with it and settle into a good relationship, meant I didn’t investigate.

But he had an addiction, and when our baby was still young, his life and then ours would fall apart.

I wonder if this would have happened when I was younger? Would I have asked more questions? Not afraid of what there was to lose. Would I have been less concerned or unaware of what being suspicious can look like in a relationship, namely insecure?

Would I have insisted we discuss the details of past breakups rather than not let “those people become characters in our lives” as he suggested? Would I have asked exactly where he was when he was out rather than giving him the freedom and privacy I thought appropriate for people who’d had independent lives, assuming I’d meet everyone in his life in time? Would I have snooped around his stuff as young girls often do and found evidence rather than thinking I was above all that?

Crucially, would my younger self have confronted the thoughts that something might not have been quite right rather than thinking no one was going to be exactly right?

I think so, but with my own determination and the collective encouragement of women, from my friends to seasoned grandmothers, who like me wished for me to experience motherhood, my instinct let me down.

Blessed with a baby, yes, but not with the father to help raise her or the partner to support me. I’ll wish for my daughter to be a mother, if that’s what she wants, for it is truly the most joyous experience of my life. But most of all I will wish for her to balance her logic and her instinct if she decides to become a parent with a male partner, because, take it from me, Mr. Good Enough is just not enough.

Mavis is a Sydney based writer that unexpectedly found herself raising her daughter as a single mother. She has two degrees, a professional career and is living proof that it takes a village to raise a child.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Aussie Sabbath 10 years ago

My best friend cannot stand to be single for any stretch of time. The amount of time that passed between her previous relationship and her current one was two weeks. She has allowed boys to behave badly in her presence without reproach, she has put up with crap, not abuse but rudeness towards others, all for the sake of 'having a man'. She is obsessed with the idea of having 4 or 5 kids and is truly convinced that if she doesn't replace a boyfriend, she won't get married and have kids. She will do anything to keep her man, including blowing off previous established plans for her boy, allowing the boy to take over others' plans and cutting off friends because the boy doesn't like them.
If she doesn't stop and think about her behaviour, she may well end up with the wrong person in her pursuit to be a wife and mother.


Pat Riarchy 10 years ago

So, I take it that you realise why men who are not losers are VERY picky.

Aussie Sabbath 10 years ago

Like they want a woman who's skinny, supermodel looks and no older than 30? If a man is open minded then they're a loser?
Oh wait, I forgot, you hate women.

Pat Riarchy 10 years ago

Quite the opposite. I LOVE women which is why I spend a month in Brasil each year.

Personally. I don't like skinny females but females do. Wouldn't mind supermodel looks though, just like females who carry on about Ryan Gosling.

A man is a loser to females if he has nothing and limited income. We know that SLIMS (single low income males) are least likely to have a female partner and the more money a man has the more likely he is to be married.

However, these days, men with assets are not willing to risk everything they have ever worked for e.g. me. I would not touch an Aussie female with a barge pole which is why I go to Brasil where females are fun and sexy.

If I have an Aussie gf and we go out a couple of times a week and say I even pay for everything and we have sex then, if I make the mistake of helping her financially in any way she can take me to the Family Court to make me pay for the sex because she never cleaned my unit or bore my children. Not for me, thanks.

Aussie Sabbath 10 years ago

If you developed a more respectful attitude to women, you wouldn't have to exploit third world ones.

The Oppressor 9 years ago

So having fun and sex with a female is exploiting her. That's EXACTLY why men leave Western females alone.