kids

Caroline Overington: "When it comes to actually keeping a baby alive, who does the work?"

You are a mum, and it goes without saying that you would do anything for your child.

Assuming you’ve got a partner, and he’s the dad, well, ditto. He would kill for the baby, with his bare hands if necessary.

And yet, when it comes to actually keeping a baby alive, who does the work?

I don’t just mean the feeding, the changing, the burping. That’s the physical load. Who in your house carries the mental load? Who actually takes responsibility for absolutely everything the baby needs to thrive?

I think I know the answer.

Let’s say you’ve got a new baby, and you have to dash to the shops. No longer can you just walk out the door. You have to plan the operation – pack this, remember that – or else, if your partner is home, and you’re thinking of leaving the baby with him for a bit, well, you’ve got to ask permission.

What is this, an episode of The Handmaid’s Tale?

No, that’s the way life is for mums, even in Australia. They carry the load – the mental load – to the point where it’s not even a little bit unusual to find women turning to their partners to say: ‘I’ve just got to run to the shops, is that okay?’

Is that okay?

Why shouldn’t that be okay? Why do you have to ask? It’s his baby, too.

And yet we – the mums – feel compelled to seek permission. And why? Because of what he’ll say, by way of response, which will usually be something like: ‘Okay, but how long will you be gone?’

Or else: ‘But when will you be back?’

Well, I don’t know. Half past never? Why do you have to know? Maybe an hour, maybe two, can’t you cope?

Of course he can, for a bit, but let’s be honest, he can’t in fact cope for very long, because the answers to the life-essential questions – when baby last ate, or what baby should eat next, or when baby needs to go to sleep, or have medication, or whatever – all that stuff is stored in your head.

Which is also why, when you go out – a very rare occurrence – he’ll inevitably call to say: ‘Where is the …?’

Or: ‘How do I?’

Gee, I don’t know, honey. Why not try to figure it out?

And it’s not just with little babies. One day soon, believe it or not, or maybe it’s already happened, it will be time for you to go back to work, and so you’ll need childcare.

Guess who is going to find the childcare centre? Guess who is going to make the appointment to meet the staff? Guess who is going to fill out the enrolment form, and find the immunisation records?

You are.

And now comes the best bit: guess whose wages the childcare fees are coming out of?

Right again: yours!

‘It costs me almost as much to go to work as it does to stay home.’

I can’t even tell you how many times I heard that from a mum, and nobody ever corrects them.

‘Childcare takes up 90 per cent of my wage.’

No, it doesn’t.

Feeling overwhelmed from parenting? You're not alone. Listen to Dr Ginni Mansberg's refreshingly earnest philosophy on parenting.

Childcare is a cost that should be shared by both parents, yet hardly anyone thinks about it that way.

In the Sydney Morning Herald recently, a mum wrote a piece saying: ‘Under the new childcare subsidy scheme, I will be required to pay $45 a day to go to work.’

What she meant was: I’m paying more in childcare fees than I’m earning.

Except that she was married. Her husband also earned an income. She was behaving like the cost came out of her wage alone.

Here’s another way of looking at it: for as long as you’ve been off work, your partner has been getting extremely high-quality, immensely flexible childcare for free.

Now you’re going back to work, somebody else is going to have to do it, and probably nobody except you is going to want to do it for free.

Therefore somebody is going to have to pay.

Yes, you could pay, but you earn less – inevitably, in almost every family, you being the woman, will earn less – therefore he can afford it and you can’t. But remember: they are his kids, too.

Somebody needs to take care of them during the day, and for six weeks, or six months, or six years, it’s been you.

Now it’s his turn. You found the place. You secured it. You filled out the endless forms. Now let him do his bit. Let him pay.

Caroline Overington’s latest book, The Ones You Trust, is about a frantically busy mum – Emma Cardwell, who also happens to be host of a popular morning TV show – who turns up at the child care centre to find her little girl isn’t there. Has somebody taken her? If so who? And why?

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Spud 6 years ago

Great article - I think Caroline and the other 2 commenters have been reading my mind. I suppose the micro-management of a baby's or a small child's needs by a mother is largely a biological imperative. However, as the child weans and grows, most mothers (myself included) find it hard to let go of this control possibly because we know or fear that dad/husband won't do it the same or right way. This may be justified or irrational. Either way, Caroline's description of the 'mental load' as children grow is completely accurate when I think of the social and extra curricular things I co-ordinate in my lunch break alone. I couldn't agree more that women must stop treating childcare costs as an outgoing to be borne by their earnings rather than as a household expense; this mentality kept no out if the permanent workforce for much longer than I anticipated; something I think adversely impacted on my parenting as well as my financial security. I suppose the challenge is trying to transfer and delegate some of the mental load to others in a more gradual way to avoid the crush of competing demands at a later stage.


Casual Observer 6 years ago

This is SO true! And while we are at it....I'm damn sick of the assumption that stay at home mums (and no I'm not one) are bludging on their husbands. Their husbands are getting on-tap housekeeping and childcare services with the ability to live their working lives free of pesky distractions like carers leave' when the kids are too germ riddled for school or day-care. Someone is making sacrifices for this to happen. Generally not the person with Y chromosome!

Funbun 6 years ago

You just made a lot of assumptions for someone who hates assumptions.
I asked around the guys at work, do you know how many agree that "stay at home mums are bludging on their husbands"? None. Nada. Not a single one.
I couldn't ask the bloke who is normally my off sider though, you'll never guess why. His kid is sick so he stayed home with them so his wife could go to work!

Kimbo 6 years ago

I think casual observer was suggesting that outside parties judge that way not the husband/father/partner of the child?!

Funbun 6 years ago

I'm not suggesting the husband/father/partner is judging their partner that way. That's clear enough. It's that the comment is about being "sick of the assumption that stay at home mums" then makes a heap of assumptions about working dads.

"Their husbands are getting on-tap housekeeping and childcare services with the ability to live their working lives free of pesky distractions like carers leave' when the kids are too germ riddled for school or day-care. Someone is making sacrifices for this to happen. Generally not the person with Y chromosome!"

It's nothing but assumptions on the husband/father/partner. When I was a kid if I got sick sometimes mum would stay home with me, sometimes dad would.