news

“I no longer have anything to say about what is now part of normal American life.”

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Moore, American filmmaker and activist, has delivered a scathing indictment of America’s gun laws, after yet another mass shooting this weekend.

Yes, another mass shooting.

This weekend a 22-year-old gunman went on a shooting rampage in Southern California. Seven people died (including the gunman) and seven others were injured in the shooting spree. He killed these people in under 10 minutes.

Elliot Rodger, a student at Santa Barbara City College, acted alone. He was seeking revenge on women who had turned him down in the past – but his hatred was not limited to individuals. In a chilling YouTube video that Rodger posted before his death, he said: “Girls, all I’ve ever wanted was to love you and to be loved by you. I’ve wanted sex. I’ve wanted love, affection, adoration. You think I’m unworthy of it. That’s a crime that can never be forgiven. If I can’t have you girls, I will destroy you.”

The lawyer for the Rodger family, Alan Schifman, released a statement revealing that Rodger had been diagnosed with Aspergers syndrome and had been undergoing psychological treatment. His family had also reached out to the police in the past, scared by his alarming behaviour.

And the way this deeply troubled man was able to kill so many, in such a short period of time, was because he somehow had access to gun.

When the police found his body, there was a semi-automatic handgun lying next to him and over 400 rounds of unspent ammunition.

Michael Moore is a Palme d’Or winning American documentary-maker and activist, who released the controversial film Bowling for Columbine in 2002. Bowling for Columbine explored the causes for the Columbine High School Massacre in 1999 and America’s relationship with violence and guns.

He is an outspoken critic of American gun laws and since the shooting this weekend, journalists, television stations and concerned citizens have reached out to Moore, seeking a comment on these latest, tragic deaths.

But Michael Moore’s statement, posted on Facebook this afternoon, is probably not what many were expecting. He wrote:

With due respect to those who are asking me to comment on last night’s tragic mass shooting at UCSB in Isla Vista, CA — I no longer have anything to say about what is now part of normal American life.

Everything I have to say about this, I said it 12 years ago: We are a people easily manipulated by fear which causes us to arm ourselves with a quarter BILLION guns in our homes that are often easily accessible to young people, burglars, the mentally ill and anyone who momentarily snaps.

We are a nation founded in violence, grew our borders through violence, and allow men in power to use violence around the world to further our so-called American (corporate) “interests.” The gun, not the eagle, is our true national symbol.

While other countries have more violent pasts (Germany, Japan), more guns per capita in their homes (Canada [mostly hunting guns]), and the kids in most other countries watch the same violent movies and play the same violent video games that our kids play, no one even comes close to killing as many of its own citizens on a daily basis as we do — and yet we don’t seem to want to ask ourselves this simple question: “Why us? What is it about US?”

Nearly all of our mass shootings are by angry or disturbed white males. None of them are committed by the majority gender, women. Hmmm, why is that? Even when 90% of the American public calls for stronger gun laws, Congress refuses — and then we the people refuse to remove them from office.

So the onus is on us, all of us. We won’t pass the necessary laws, but more importantly we won’t consider why this happens here all the time.

When the NRA says, “Guns don’t kill people — people kill people,” they’ve got it half-right. Except I would amend it to this: “Guns don’t kill people — Americans kill people.” Enjoy the rest of your day, and rest assured this will all happen again very soon.

The gun lobby in America – which lobbies the government, ostensibly on the behalf of ordinary citizens, to maintain the status quo of gun regulation in the states – is not beloved by Michael Moore.

But when someone argues “gun don’t kill people – people kill people”, they are also forgetting one very important fact.

Guns assist people in killing people. More quickly. And more efficiently.

Elliot Rodger killed six people and injured seven others in under 10 minutes.

As Richard Martinez, the father of one of the six victims confirmed dead – Chris Martinez – cried today:

Why did Chris die? Chris died because of craven, irresponsible politicians and the NRA.

They talk about gun rights. What about Chris’s right to live? When will this insanity stop? When will enough people say stop this madness? We don’t have to live like this.

Too many have died. We should say to ourselves: ‘Not one more.’

Here is a gallery of items the US has banned in schools, instead of banning guns in their country.

We will keep you updated as further details emerge. 

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Mark W. Mumma 10 years ago

Very simple explanation of not only why 'gun control' will ultimately fail, but why we're less safe the more gun control we have. This recent shooting took place in the state with the most stringent gun laws. Toughest gun laws in the country. Did it stop Rodger? No. It won't stop the next one, or the next one or the next one.

If you can't understand this short, 7 minute video, then there is no hope for an honest discussion about what gun control is really about. it isn't about making people safer, because it clearly doesn't. California gun laws didn't stop this mass murder. CA laws never could. Never will. You can pass all the laws you want and a crazy, law breaking person is going to go on a killing spree regardless. This proves it.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

mamamegan 10 years ago

it proves shit. CA gun laws are nowhere near as tough as those in Australia. Do you know how many mass shootings we have had since these tough gun laws were introduced….0

SH 10 years ago

This is bollocks and that's why we can't have an 'honest' discussion about this. Posting a video of some lunatic talking about how safe guns actually are does your cause no good when the proof keeps coming to us with horrific and heartbreaking regularity. And you lot, with no solutions other than, 'well that's just how it is.' Shameful.

Sandy Hook - how can you overlook that? All those babies dead in a blink of a... bullet.

No you're wrong - the problem is the guns, the prevalence of them, the ease with which they can fall into any old looney's hands, the entitlement, the gun culture, the guns guns GUNS. Guns kill - yes they do! Disgusting video. Puke!

Mark W. Mumma 10 years ago

The video says nothing about 'how safe guns are'. (But nice try.)

The video talks about the INSANITY of cutting the horns off of a gazelle. That's what the gun grabbers want to do is make everyone defenseless.

Like the video says: If you make it easy for predators, you get MORE predators. Sandy Hook Elementary was a GUN FREE ZONE. A place where 'gazelles have no horns'.

Clearly "gun free zones" are not keeping criminals with guns away. In fact, it seems to ATTRACT THEM. But let's all pretend we're safer when we're disarmed. The drooling idiots insist we're safer when we can't defend ourselves.

MIND-NUMBING STUPIDITY.


Mark W. Mumma 10 years ago

How are "laws" to blame? (Or the lack thereof)
There is already a law against murder.
There are already laws against brandishing a weapon.

Elliot Rodger BROKE those laws. Do we really believe he would break those two yet somehow honor a law against high capacity magazines or some other restriction?

Wise up people.

anon 10 years ago

Making it harder for loonies to get their hands on guns, rather than being able to buy them at their local Kmart, is what we're talking about here. Taking the ease out of getting hold of slaughter machines. Your defeatist, 'leave it as it is,' attitude isn't working very well.

Mark W. Mumma 10 years ago

There is a very, very simple solution. If you only want to make it more difficult for loonies to get guns then ONE SIMPLE QUESTION could be added to the current federal background check questions.

Are you now, or have you ever, supported liberal causes, voted for a democrat and/or demanded tougher gun laws.

A "yes" answer would flag the application to purchase a gun, or obtain a CCL to be denied.

Problem solved.

Seamus MacFhearchair BSc SSc 10 years ago

You're talking about it as though the law would apply to the user, IE: 'Rule #43487265: No using guns for the wrong reasons, or elsies'. The law would affect the sale of guns. The person breaking the law would be the person selling the gun. That much should be clear to most people who can think without watching the news for support. It's been proven time and time again that GUN CONTROL DOES WORK. Look around the world and you will see events that disprove your claims of it being useless.

The fact of the matter is that the more difficult it is for someone to get a gun (or any object in the world, for that matter) for the wrong reasons, the more difficulty that person will have trying to fulfil his intentions. This is a universal truth for everyone except those people that can make something appear as a tangible object in their hands simply by thinking about it. It is irrefutable. No one, not even you can prove that wrong.

Now, please, please, PLEASE explain to me how reducing the availability of guns won't reduce the availability of guns...

Mark W. Mumma 10 years ago

"It's been proven time and time again that GUN CONTROL DOES WORK"

I have looked at the world around me. Sounds like it is time for you to do a little reality check of your own. California has the toughest gun laws in the USA. Clearly it didn't stop a whiny little guy who wasn't getting laid from shooting up a bunch of people.

Chicago has had a gun ban for years. How's that working out?

Somehow pimply faced, horny young men are a result of the NRA. Does anybody really believe that?