wellness

'Like Gwenyth Paltrow, I live away from my partner. Here's why it works.'

Living apart together (LAT), a current a lifestyle choice of Gwyneth Paltrow and her husband Brad Falchuk, has got some attention of late, but what does it mean for the rest of us? Is anyone doing it and is it as good as it sounds?

My partner and I are currently in a LAT relationship. In fact, we don’t just live apart together, we are long distance LATs, meaning that every second weekend, one of us is on a plane somewhere between Melbourne and Sydney. 

Having both exited other relationships, my partner and I wouldn’t have it any other way. We’ve discussed it at length, from every angle and have answered the questions of many of our concerned friends, who use words such as unsustainable; or phrases such as I like coming home to someone. Which is great, if that works for you, but what it if doesn’t?

What if your greatest fear isn’t going home alone, but your passionate relationship becoming that of siblings or flatmates? For some, companionship is everything, and we aren’t judgemental of the traditional relationships that have dominated our society, but what if there was another way - if two people chose it?

I have two children under 10. In all honesty, I don’t want my partner here in the middle of the week when I’m making lunches; the kids are fighting and I’m trying to remember which night the bins go out. Similarly, he doesn’t want me in his apartment asking him what time he’s coming home from work; and neither of us have decided how much he should or shouldn’t be involved in the parenting of my . 

My entire life has been about trying to fit myself into boxes that have never fit me well. What I do love, is running out of the airport every fortnight to see him, that every kiss still feels like the first, that when we are together, we are completely soaked in one another’s presence because we know that we have many days ahead of us where we can work on that report, sit in front of the television or figure out which day the bins go out.

With two children who require help with homework, school drop offs and pick-ups and gymnastic runs, I never feel lonely. What I’m learning, is that it’s not the number of hours in a day that count, it’s what you do with them. 

Marriage has been idealised and romanticised, but the reality is that relationships are really hard work. People underestimate the fragility of marriage and when you throw kids and mortgages and bin night into the equation, it can feel impossible.

I’m not against marriage, a part of me really wants to be good at it, but I know myself well enough to realise that it may not be for us. And that’s okay.

Psychotherapist Esther Perel says there are two types of people in the world: realists and romantics. Realists believe in marriage and are unlikely to leave. On the other hand, romantics desire nothing more than romance and passion (and will seek it out if it fades). Both can be critical of the other. I am not judgemental of either but in an ideal world, realists would partner with realists, and romantics with romantics. You can imagine the nightmare when one partners with the other.

A LAT relationship allows two fiercely independent people to remain so, it allows us to miss each other, it fans the flames of passion, and it has helped ensure that I am present with my partner and my kids. The few times a year, my two worlds collide, I am exhausted from simultaneously trying to be a present mother and a present partner, and I can’t wait for things to go back to ‘normal.’

A LAT lifestyle isn’t for everyone, but I’ve realised that marriage and living together isn’t either.

Dani, a writer and podcaster met James, a children’s publisher when he signed her first picture book and then a six-book deal. They started dating about six months later, Dani lives in Sydney and James lives in Melbourne. They see each every second week, and work together on multiple projects. 

Feature Image: Supplied

Calling All Skincare Enthusiasts! Complete this short survey now and go in the running to win one of four $50 gift vouchers!

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

sarah_lubikowski a year ago 1 upvotes
This actually sounds like a dream for a second time round partnership - at the start anyway whilst kids are young! 
rush a year ago
@sarah_lubikowski yeah, I can see why it works for them - but I'd be interested to see what comes next once the kids are older. 
@rush What do you mean? Would you expect the couple to want to live together once the kids are teens (why?), or when they leave home...? I inferred the author's children are not with her current partner, so not sure there would be a natural inclination to want to form a nuclear family. 
rush a year ago
@mamamia-user-482898552 because it sounds like a large part of why they don't live together is her not wanting him to have to deal with all the "kid stuff", and her being able to focus solely on the kids when they need her without worrying that she's neglecting him. Which is fine, they're not his kids and she doesn't expect him to take on a fatherly role, this seems to work for them. But I wonder if they might change their living arrangements once the kids are older and/or out of the house, and she has more free time to spend together. I mean, maybe they won't live together once the kids are gone, whatever floats their boat, but when the kids are mentioned as being a factor in them living apart, it's not a huge leap to wonder if they'd live together once the kids are gone. 
mamamia-user-482898552 a year ago 1 upvotes
@rush I don't live with my long-term partner and we don't have kids. Much of the appeal of this lifestyle is the retention of one's own space and routine - both of us prefer independence. Paradoxically it also means that the time we choose to spend together is without any of the drudgeries of domestic life - we don't fight over chores or bills - it's all the pluses of being in a relationship without any of the minuses that come with sharing a space.