health

A little less soft porn and a little more surfing please... 13 y/o writes fierce letter to magazine.

 

 

 

 

 

13-year-old Olive Bowers isn’t afraid of the waves. A keen surfer, she can be found down at the beach with the boys – and other female surfers – during summer.

The year eight student also isn’t afraid to tell people what she really thinks.

After reading a recent issue of Tracks magazine – the self-proclaimed “surfer’s bible” – Olive was disgruntled when she realised how little coverage of actual women’s surfing there was in the mag.

Olive was even more troubled when she visited the website and clicked on a tab titled “Girls” – only to be shown pages of images of semi-naked women without so much as a surfboard in sight.

But rather than being quietly disappointed, Olive decided to speak out and write a letter to the magazine. Her letter, posted on her mother’s Facebook page, read:

Dear Tracks Surf Magazine,

I want to bluntly address the way you represent women in your magazine. I am a surfer, my dad surfs and my brother has just started surfing.

Reading a Tracks magazine I found at my friend’s holiday house, the only photo of a woman I could find was ‘’Girl of the Month’’. She wasn’t surfing or even remotely near a beach. Since then I have seen some footage of Stephanie Gilmore surfing on your website, but that’s barely a start.

I clicked on your web page titled ‘’Girls’’ hoping I might find some women surfers and what they were up to, but it entered into pages and pages of semi-naked, non-surfing girls.

These images create a culture in which boys, men and even girls reading your magazine will think that all girls are valued for is their appearance.

My posse of female surfers and I are going to spread the word and refuse to purchase or promote Tracks magazine. It’s a shame that you can’t see the benefits of an inclusive surf culture that in fact, would add a whole lot of numbers to your subscription list.

I urge you to give much more coverage to the exciting women surfers out there, not just scantily clad women (who may be great on the waves, but we’ll never know).

I would subscribe to your magazine if only I felt that women were valued as athletes instead of dolls. This change would only bring good.

Olive

Luke Kennedy, editor of Tracks magazine, spoke to Fairfax and said that, “’obviously [women] not our primary audience. We have written extensively about female surfers in the past.”

This is not the first time that the surfing industry has stirred up controversy for appearing not to take female surfers seriously. In July last year, a Roxy Pro ad caused an uproar when – instead of promoting their competition with footage of women actually surfing – it focused on gratuitous shots of a female surfer’s behind.

Surfers are athletes. What they do requires skill, and training, and early mornings, and (one would think) quite a bit of bravery. So maybe it’s time female athletes start being shown the respect they deserve.

Less soft porn, and more surfing.

Here are some of the world’s best female surfing tearing up the waves.  With surfboards. And wetsuits.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Kathy W 10 years ago

I do recall writing exactly the same letter to Tracks magazine - way back in 1988 - to the then editor John Ellis.
I was one of a handful of women surfers on Sydney's northern beaches. We were definitely breaking ground back then - when the surf was primarily occupied by men and we entered the water at our peril.
Unfortunately Olive is shouting into the wind. Tracks is still a 'boy's club'. And sadly, competitive surfers like Stephanie Gilmour (who is actually in the Roxy shot used in this post) are collaborating with the manufacturers' of this overt sexism.
Anyway Olive, at least you can surf. Myself and my friends were often bullied out of the water and called really disgusting names. I hope you don't have to put up with that EVER.

melissawellham 10 years ago

Well said, Kathy W.


I wonder... 10 years ago

Would a 13 year old really say scantily clad women? Could this perhaps be mums penmanship at work? Either way it needed to be said so well done Olive (and Olive's mum).

antipop 10 years ago

Yep. It's a pretty common phrase. At 13 you are in year 8 or 9.

Anna 10 years ago

Many 13 year olds are more articulate than you would expect. My Yr 7s can be fairly impressive.

Anna 10 years ago

Lots of 13 year olds are marvelous writers - my sister used to pen incredible letters to Mattel and other big brands, criticising them for having sexist ads!