parent opinion

"I've felt close to crying with rage at the unfairness of it all." The pandemic's hidden toll on women's workloads.

 

The feature image used is a stock image. The contributors of this story are known to Mamamia but have chosen to remain anonymous for privacy reasons. 

“When something has to give, it is very often women’s careers: their working hours, the expectations of what they are able to accomplish on the job, or the job itself.”

**

When I shared this quote by author and academic Caitlyn Collins with a group of Mamamia mothers, it hit a nerve. I was inundated with messages from women who have been spending the coronavirus pandemic silently seething.

As one woman, Lucy, explained, this crisis has made her realise that the gains made by women in terms of equality, work, income distribution, and equal parenting are built on an incredibly fragile foundation.

WATCH: Horoscopes homeschooling. Post continues after video.

“There has definitely been a shift in the distribution of domestic work (I’m doing a bigger proportion), now that we’re both working from home, and I think it’s been far too easy to revert to traditional gender roles. It definitely makes me worry about the future of my two daughters,” Lucy told Mamamia.

Before the pandemic, fellow mum Kerry was working 20 hours a week as a solicitor while her two-year-old spent three days a week in care, and her older two attended school.

Once all three children were home, and both she and her husband were trying to work amongst it all, she quickly realised it was her work that was going to have to suffer – not his.

“I have often felt close to crying with rage at the unfairness of it all. It is so disempowering. Any attempts to try and equalise the load resulted in my husband pulling the financial ‘trump card’ because he earns so much more than me,” she told Mamamia.

While Kerry has spent her evenings trying to catch up on missed work while juggling homeschool and childcare during the day, he has pretty much worked on uninterrupted, apart from occasionally getting angry at the noise the kids were making in the background of his Zoom calls.

As Claire explained to Mamamia: "It's a really tough situation for a lot of women. Since we are usually the ones who take extended parental leave, we are in and out of the workforce as we grow our families. My husband's job has to take priority as he is the steady earner. It's such a tough situation as I am a proud independent woman and don't want to be dependent on anyone."

Cat has had to do the same, and shared: "As a family this is the logical solution in the circumstances, given he earns more than me but I feel that ever since having children my career (and salary) has suffered."

Even though paternal parental leave is an option, Claire's right - it is generally mothers who take the more significant career break when a heterosexual couple starts a family. According to 2017 data, only one in 20 fathers use the scheme.

But now COVID-19 has hit, these women's careers are again being sacrificed.

"When it all falls away, we are expected to put ourselves last (which inevitably means our jobs) and fill the gaps," said Piper.

Eve earns more than her husband, and yet in lockdown he's just assumed she'll take care of it (it being entertaining their four-year-old while they both work from home).

"He disappears to his office without asking if I can watch our son. He insists however that I can always ‘ask him to help’. Him ‘babysitting’ often means he will turn on the TV," she told Mamamia.

LISTEN: Holly and Andrew talk parenting in isolation. Post continues after podcast.

Candy's husband has been on parental leave and returned to work last week. Even with his return she's still the primary breadwinner, but: "The work switch went back on and he just seemed to not even notice all the other things required to run the household and take care of our daughter.

"I, on the other hand, got very little work done.  He also commandeered my office, took over with his equipment and I am now working from the dining room," she told Mamamia.

"I’m a feminist lawyer with three degrees, raised by a feminist mother and I would never want my daughter to accept this. But ingrained in my psyche is my ability to do all of these 'household' things better, faster, with less fuss than my husband," she added.

Sociologist with the University of Tasmania Meredith Nash isn't surprised by these stories.

Speaking to Mamamia she explained, "Even at the best of times, women with caring responsibilities struggle to manage paid work and caring.

"The global pandemic has magnified the effects of this as schools have closed and sources of formal and informal care became unavailable due to social distancing and stay-at-home measures. The pandemic has thus demanded that families make decisions about how they manage unpaid caring labour. Unsurprisingly, this extra domestic labour is falling to women, exacerbating existing gender inequality. In general, the pandemic is magnifying the fact that the social value of caring is not recognised in Australia."

Then there's the guilt.

"I think it’s likely guilt that pushes many working mothers to decide it’s too hard to juggle both and either reduce their working hours or give up their careers entirely," said Janelle.

"Do many fathers feel the level of guilt mothers do around trying to maintain their professional responsibilities as well as take on the extra caring (and educating) roles while working from home?" she asked.

The conversations Mamamia has had over the past week suggest the answer to that is a resounding no. Of course, there will always be exceptions. But judging by the ferocity at which these women jumped at this conversation, with many remarking 'thank god it's not just me,' it's hard to ignore the trend.

**

But it's not just in male-female relationships where this backwards slump into outdated and sexist behaviour has been noticed. Some women have also become aware of the disturbing attitudes of their employers.

Karen has had feedback from her boss that "they weren't happy with my productivity while working from home and looking after two toddlers". Her husband's employer on the other hand has been incredibly supportive of him, as though their mentality is "OMG he is also taking care of children - that must be so hard".

Sarah has been forced to take leave without pay because her boss wouldn't support the reduced hours that would allow her to look after her kids during the pandemic. It's resulted in her missing important events, projects, and end-of-year reviews.

Chelsea - who only returned from maternity leave in May - has just found out she's the only person in her 40-odd office to be made part-time during the pandemic (something she didn't ask for).

Rafael Mayano, Australian CEO of the Adecco Group, the world's leading HR solutions company, told Mamamia, "Initially, we may see an impact on equality in the workplace due to working parents (particularly mothers) not able to continue working while parenting now that they co-exist at home."

But ultimately, Rafael thinks in the long-run COVID-19 will revolutionise workplaces into a new normal which will benefit working parents.

"For many organisations this [working from home] is now a proven model and has worked well. As children go back to school or previous care arrangements, there will be greater flexibility for both parents to be working from home. I believe this will create better opportunities for working parents than it ever has before and any drop we see in the short term to equality in the workplace will not only be regained but be more balanced in the future," he said.

Encouragingly, Rafael also thinks the pandemic will reveal that "crisis leadership requires a different set of skills and behaviours that may help a new breed of leaders to emerge, who are more empathetic and seek input and listen. One case in point is the observation that countries and cities led by women have fared better during the COVID-19 crisis so far," he explained.

The frustration among working mothers right now is palpable. For some it's their workplace that's completely poked holes in any flexibility they'd previously alluded to, while for others it's their partners whose attitudes are far more rigid and conservative than they'd ever realised.

Either way, for many women, the coronavirus pandemic has forced them back into traditional gender roles. Roles that don't allow women the freedom and autonomy we've spent decades fighting for. And roles that ultimately don't allow them to be wholly independent.

As Mary, who recently found out her husband is having an affair, says, "We need to support women in making the best long term decisions for them, not just the best short term decision for the family.

"As long term, you may not have the nuclear family that you sacrificed your career for."

Feature image: Getty.

This article originally appeared in Gemma Bath’s weekly news deep dive email. You can subscribe right here.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

gypsy 4 years ago 3 upvotes
I think it is time for some realism whether people like to hear it or not.  The major breadwinner's job has got to be protected for the family's sake.  Money makes the world go around.  It is obvious that the husband, in this case, is the main earner.  One would then assume he has a big job and needs to protect it.  If the wife was the main earner then it would all be reversed.  If he lost his job the family would not do too well on 20 hours a week.  Everything in our life is weird at the moment and we all have to work around that.  If it was me I wouldn't want him to lose his job.  Of course at times of the day he can pull his weight within the home but he is going to need more time out from the home duties to cover full time job commitments.  I think people are getting a bit ridiculous.  You are a family and tending to your kids shouldn't be that painful or maybe you shouldn't have had them if deep down career means more.
cat 4 years ago 2 upvotes
@gypsy her husband sharing homeschooling and house duties doesn’t equate to wanting him to lose his job. That’s a fairly absurd assertion. And it would be both outrageous and, I suspect, illegal for his employers to fire him for shifting his hours around slightly to provide childcare. 

And the issue is that when the whole of society colludes to make sure men are always the breadwinners, women always have to do more work than men while being economically dependant. The very, very least men can do is to split the unpaid labour equally. 
gypsy 4 years ago
@cat In 2020 this is about the major  and minor earner, not gender. As I said it could be reversed from her situation. If you expect the major earner to split  house duties in half the major earner is doing 50 hrs (approx. for the point) now and the minor earner is doing 30 because the major earner added half the home duties to their hours. If it was a stay at home husband being slack and expecting the corporate earning big job wife to still do heaps well he would be frowned upon. The article said she only did 20hrs paid work and he did full time.  There is a big difference of committed hours there. 
<deleted> 4 years ago 3 upvotes
<deleted>
cat 4 years ago 1 upvotes
@gypsy the article literally includes examples where women who are the main earners are still doing the majority of child care. The woman who works 20 hours now has to care for children and homeschool full time and is working in the evenings. So she is doing 30+ hours a week of care and 20 of work, while her husband does 40. That’s clearly not fair by any means. 
 
And the wider issue is that women have to take a hit to their careers over and over again. Hence the million dollar disparity in their lifetime earnings, and vastly different superannuation outcomes. If they get divorced tomorrow then she will struggle to get by and he will have all the benefits of a career subsidised by her labour. It’s very easy for men to continually argue that their jobs are more important in the short term, but actually being in a partnership doesn’t mean disadvantaging one person over and over until they are dependant. She spends 3 days of every week sacrificing career progression for the family, absolute least he can do is protect her right to work 20 hours a week for a few months, even if that means doing a whole 50 hours himself. 

cat 4 years ago 1 upvotes
Money isn’t a trump card. Yes we all need it, but there’s no rule that it’s more important than equality and your happiness. If he thinks it does and has no interest in compromising so you can get what you want in life, a swift divorce is going to save you a long, miserable marriage. Why stay with someone who thinks that ultimately, you are less important than them? 

I’d also recommend costing out the hours you put into the house and childcare at the rate you would pay if it was outsourced., Add your income, and see if he’s still the breadwinner.

But really, sounds like you’ll be better off without him. Tell him he can have custody of the kids until you’ve had a few years to focus on your career.  
gypsy 4 years ago
@cat He may not think she is less important Cat, he may think his income is very important. Also, she may well be better off without him but not better off without his income.  I think you are understating the importantance of a strong steady salary. Women often struggle financially after separation. I still think the major income needs to be nurtured, regardless of which  partner is earning it. We all know the carers of children put in a huge amount of unpaid hours, that is nothing new but it won’t pay the bills. As I said at the start people have got to be realistic. If the female is the major earner  and he is shoving her out of her office, don’t allow it, put him in his place. In that family her income needs to be nurtured. He should be attending more to the kids and home. 
cat 4 years ago
@gypsy the sooner she leaves and focuses on her career, the better her economic outcome will be. 

There’s no such thing as a strong steady salary if it isn’t paid directly to you. 50% of women end up divorced, that makes relying on a husbands income an incredibly risky financial strategy. If shares had a 50% chance of becoming valueless you certainly wouldn’t buy them.