news

Two autopsies, two different stories: What George Floyd's second autopsy revealed.

 

At 9:25 p.m on Monday, May 25, George Floyd died in the custody of the Minneapolis police.

That night, an officer had handcuffed the black man for allegedly trying to use a fake $20 bill, before holding him down with a knee on his neck for almost nine minutes, as Floyd pleaded that he could not breathe.

Floyd was pronounced dead in hospital a short time later.

The 46-year-old man’s death has triggered protests across America, as the nation responds to the irrefutable injustice black citizens continue to experience at the hands of authorities.

In the days since Floyd’s passing, two contradicting accounts have emerged about the exact cause of his death.

Listen: ‘I Can’t Breathe’: George Floyd’s Final Words Echo An Australian Shame. post continues below audio.

The official autopsy by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner, which was cited in the court charging document against the police officer who drove his knee into Floyd’s neck, said there was no evidence of traumatic strangulation.

It also stated that possible substances in Floyd’s system and underlying medical conditions, including coronary artery disease and hypertension, likely contributed to Floyd’s death.

However, on Monday afternoon in America, an independent autopsy presented by the lawyers representing Floyd’s family said his death was a homicide and therefore stated the three officers on the scene should be held criminally responsible.

The independent autopsy states Floyd died by “homicide caused by asphyxia due to neck and back compression that led to a lack of blood flow to the brain”.

The two doctors hired by Floyd’s family to conduct the independent autopsy found no underlying health conditions in Floyd that caused his death, finding he instead died from asphyxiation – essentially suffocation. They said he was likely dead before he was placed into an ambulance.

“The evidence is consistent with mechanical asphyxia as cause of death and homicide as manner of death,” said Dr. Allecia Wilson of the University of Michigan, one of the two forensic doctors who performed an independent autopsy.

Bystander video showed Floyd pleading to be let up and saying repeatedly that he couldn't breath, as police officer Derek Chauvin kept his knee firmly pinned into Floyd's neck for nearly nine minutes. Two other officers applied pressure with their knees to Floyd's back.

Dr. Michael Baden, who also took part in the independent autopsy at the behest of Floyd's family, said the two other officers' actions also caused Floyd to stop breathing.

"We can see after a little bit less than four minutes that Mr. Floyd is motionless, lifeless," Baden said.

Chauvin, who is white and has been fired from the Minneapolis police department, was charged with third-degree murder and manslaughter last week. The two other officers were also fired, but not charged.

Shortly after the family's independent autopsy findings were released, the medical examiner’s office in Hennepin County, Minnesota, announced an updated autopsy result in which they said Floyd's death was a homicide.

The updated autopsy said Floyd's cause of death was "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restrain, and neck compression". This means Floyd's heart failed.

It further acknowledged that Floyd died from experiencing a “cardiopulmonary arrest while being restrained by law enforcement officer(s)".

 


Sign up for the "Mamamia Daily" newsletter. Get across the stories women are talking about today.


Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

snorks 4 years ago
Both autopsies seem to be mostly correct. 
There was no strangulation, but there was the compression that lead to the loss of blood flow. 

The no underlying conditions section is what will decide if this was a murder or not. 
(Don't get me wrong, I think it was a murder, but if he had an underlying condition I'd be pretty sure it'll end up being called manslaughter)
<deleted> 4 years ago 1 upvotes
<deleted>
snorks 4 years ago
@daijobou Yes there is (coincidentally I was just studying it this weekend). The Egg Shell Skull Rule only applies to the civil side of things, but there are similar ideas on the criminal side. 
Though I'm not fully up to date on how it applies in the USA they do have a similar rule. 

However, in order for it to be Murder (or more specifically Third Degree Murder in this particular case) there has to be a desire to harm the victim, or done something which obviously would have caused a death (firing a gun into a crowd at random would fit here). 

Did that happen here? I don't know, could see it going either way. 

My declaration on the underlying conditions deciding the case was not based on law, more based on..... realism maybe?? Not sure that's the best word. Just I can't see the cop being found guilty of murder if the person died of complications the cop had no knowledge of. 

(Some of these definitions relate to Minnesota only, may be different in other areas)
cat 4 years ago 2 upvotes
@snorks I think any jury that watches the video will see that there was a clear intent to kill. He literally tried to tell the officer he was dying, people watching could see he was dying, and there was no reason to be restraining him at all. 8 minutes without oxygen will kill anyone. The standard for 3rd degree is an ‘extreme disregard to the value of human life’, if this doesn’t meet that bar then nothing does. 


snorks 4 years ago
@cat There are plenty of things that meet the bar better than this. Shooting into a crowd and driving a car into a crowd are examples used online. 

I would imagine they would claim negligence rather than intent.