pregnancy

Meet the Catholic church leaders who believe women have a right to have an abortion.

Think you know what the Catholic view on abortion is? Well, Jon O’Brien is here to set you straight.

“This stereotypical view that being a Catholic means you’re anti-abortion is downright wrong around the world, and I think it’s downright wrong in Australia,” O’Brien says.

O’Brien, who is currently visiting Australia, is president of Catholics For Choice. The organisation was formed by three American women in the 1970s. It supports women’s right to follow their own conscience when it comes to birth control and abortion.

“Ninety-nine per cent of Catholic women who are sexually active in the United States of America use a method of birth control that the bishops don’t like,” O’Brien says. “Ninety-nine per cent! If you had a campaign against something, I think you might give up at some point if you knew that 99 per cent of those people you were supposed to be trying to convince didn’t agree with you.

“When it comes to abortion, Catholic women have abortions at the same rate as those of other faiths, or those of no faith.”

Catholics have abortions too. Photo via iStock.

O'Brien believes most Catholics don't listen to the church hierarchy's teachings on birth control anymore.

"Young Catholic women these days, their mums will tell them, 'Make sure you look after yourself, make sure you protect yourself, make sure that when you’re having sex that it’s in a situation that you feel good, and that when you decide to have a child, you’re ready for one.' I think that's the way we talk to one another in our Catholic communities today."

He says there's not much preaching against contraception at Sunday Mass anymore. Instead, the message has been taken to parliament.

"They’re putting politicians under pressure so that those politicians end up enacting policies that the Catholic hierarchy support but very few other people do."

O'Brien believes abortion should be legal and safe, and there should be no stigma attached to it.

"I think it’s only women that can be actually trusted with this decision," he says. "When a woman chooses to involve her partner, her family, her priest or whatever in that decision-making, all well and good. But the idea that we deal with abortion within a criminal code, I think that that’s antiquated thinking."

Obviously, there are people who disapprove of O'Brien's views. He says some people - usually the ones who are a "little bit ignorant" about Catholicism - try to tell him he's not Catholic.

"What makes you a Catholic is your baptism," he points out. "This idea that I have to agree about abortion with the bishops, and that makes me Catholic or not, that’s a little fairytale."

Not all Catholics agree with the teachings of the church hierarchy. Photo via iStock.

O'Brien says he likes going to Mass.

"I like the whole ceremony, I like the community of it, I like the social justice," he explains.

It's this sense of social justice that drives Catholics For Choice. O'Brien believes that putting restrictions on abortion discriminates against people who are less well off.

"If you have the right credit cards, you can circumvent any prohibition. You can get on a plane,  you can get whatever procedure you want. The people who really suffer are the poor.

"As Catholics, we believe in social justice. It's not despite my faith but because of my faith that I actually believe in a woman’s right to make a decision."

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

anonymous 7 years ago

A church that will never allow women to take leadership roles is a church of the past. That is where it should be relegated. People who still want to call themselves Catholic, especially the increasing number who seek the 'cheap, private education' it offers for their children, are DIRECTLY responsible for the terrible effects on women of third world countries whose lives are affected by this church's policies. The Vatican is a morally dangerous organisation to women, always has been and it is the most vulnerable women who suffer most.


Kate B 7 years ago

You can't cherry pick the parts of Catholicism you want. You're in or out.

Ineedacoffee 7 years ago

But they not, they saying what others choose is their chocie and not up to them to decide based in their belief for another
Dont mean they would choose it for themselves

Oddly this is all i ask of religious people, have your religion fine, dont involve it in my life, inc laws, health and education

Grumpier monster 7 years ago

Of course you can cherry pick. At one point catholic women were expected to wear hats during the mass. Despite denunciations from the clergy, they eventually won the battle and went hat-free. At another point Catholics believed in slavery because it was in the bible. Eventually the Vatican bowed to internal pressure, reinterpreted the scripture and declared that slavery was wrong.
I'm an active member of my catholic church (I do the readings and contribute in other ways to the service). I'm also a progressive Catholic who believes the church should change its opinion on contraception, abortion, gay marriage, married priests, and female priests.

I believe the central message of Catholicism is that we should treat each other respectfully and compassionately and that we should love God. For people who don't/can't believe in the "great sky fairy" that means you love the planet and all its life forms and believe that people have a conscience.

The Catholic Church has split many times. Currently it is divided, often on geographical lines, between fundamentalists, traditionalists and progressives, The current progressive pope has a huge battle to get sex off the table, and replace it with charity and environmentalism.

Ineedacoffee 7 years ago

See public services, laws, health, education should be religion free as they service ALL people or they would need to include ALL religion, now since that aint possible, keep it no religion.
People have churches and their homes to practice their belief, it dont need to be in our laws, health or education

Gu3st 7 years ago

The difference here is that public or civic matters are shaped by democratic forces, everyone gets their say. Religious doctrine has been codified for centuries/millenia.

Why should those who don't follow religion allow it's dogma to shape their day to day life when they have absolutely no say on what shape that interference takes?

Religious voters get to shape their civic environment via a vote, whereas irreligious citizens can't vote to shape religion.