When I was in year 5, I saw my teacher, Miss Hansford in the supermarket carpark. I was befuddled. She buys groceries? She DRIVES a CAR? She wears JEANS? It was so disconcerting to see her out of her natural habitat. I didn’t like it one bit.
I feel similarly discombobulated when I get a glimpse at the real life of politicians. The idea of them sitting around a dinner table with their family. Helping the kids with homework. Vacuuming.….It makes it harder to go back to seeing them as a two-dimensional talking head.
Tony Abbott is one of the clearest characters in politics. There’s no confusion about who he is or what he stands for. He’s the pugilistic conservative; brutally effective in destroying the government. He is traditional, religious and pragmatic.
Margie Abbott and the three lovely Abbott daughters are regulars at his side – part of the Tony package.
Christine Forster is Tony Abbott’s little sister. She is gay.
It turns “brand Abbott” upside down. The man who strongly stands against gay marriage, has a little sister who is living with a woman she’d very much, like to marry.
When Bob Katter’s gay brother Carl took his story to the media, it was an airing of very dirty family laundry. Carl’s rage at his brother’s condemnation of gay marriage has caused a very public split between the brothers.
The Abbott family has acted very differently. From what we know of the Opposition Leader, it wouldn’t have been a surprise if he had (like so many families do) turned his back on his sister. But the would-be Priest has embraced his sister’s lifestyle. He loves her, no matter what.
In an interview over the weekend, Tony Abbott spoke about what happened when Christine decided to leave her husband for a woman.
“These things happen,” said Abbott. “The marriage ended. For Chris it was replaced by something else that is marvellous. She has regrets but she did something brave, authentic, something she felt had to be done. I can respect that even if I can’t in every sense understand it … I’ve come to the view over the years that the only side you can take is that which tries to maintain relationships. Getting judgmental in ways which damage relationships does no one any good.”
His sister Christine says she loves her brother and that he showed her sympathy and acceptance when she came out to him. He’s been, by all accounts, a really good brother.
“My brother and I have always had a strong relationship and he respects and supports me and my lifestyle choices,” she said.
“Tony, Margie and their daughters have warmly welcomed Virginia into their family.”
But she hasn’t been able to change his mind on the issue of gay marriage; it’s been a topic of heated conversation between them. Christine says she’ll keep working on him, and Tony says he’s not likely to change his mind. They are a (fairly) regular brother and sister. They’re allowed to disagree.
“Chris and I have always got on very well. She’s a very level-headed, down-to-earth, pretty tough-minded individual. She’s more politically centrist than I am but she’s no bleeding heart lefty either. Her views are well thought through, well formed, balanced and decent. Recently we’ve argued over gay marriage. Not a nasty argument – more of a discussion than an argument. I think she understands my position,” he said.
The Coalition made a commitment before the last election that they wouldn’t make any changes to the marriage laws. After months and months of calling Gillard a liar, it’d be politically perilous for Tony Abbott to go back on his word on this. The cries of hypocrisy would be deafening.
Both parties are too scared of the backlash from “middle Australia” to move forward on same-sex marriage… Labor has allowed a conscience vote (meaning they won’t force their member to vote along party lines) but they won’t have the numbers to change anything. The Coalition always has the freedom to vote according to their conscience, but they too wouldn’t have enough members to make a difference – but it’s not up to the Coalition right now anyway.
When questioned on the issue in the past Tony Abbott has always picked his words carefully to show that he isn’t against gay people, but, as a staunch Catholic, he can’t agree that “marriage” could be defined any other way than a union between a man and a woman.
When asked about the issue during the 2010 election, he said, “I hope I would always find it in my heart to treat people the way everyone should be treated – with dignity and respect. And I think people who know me well, who are gay, would be only too happy to testify to that.”
In hindsight, that statement is a little more poignant.
In his book, Battlelines, Tony Abbott wrote: “Politicians are volunteers. They choose their life. Families are conscripts. Exposing your family to public notice is part of the inescapable downside of being in public life.”
There must have been a number of times when it would’ve been on the tip of his tongue. When people were laughing at the suggestions that Parliament’s tough guy understood the hardships faced by the gay community. When people told him he needed to get out of the Church and get to know some gay people. When people told him he was shut off from the real world and stuck in the past.
It would have been terribly easy for him to say, “You don’t know everything about me. I do know what I’m talking about. My sister is gay.”
But he never did. He kept her confidence to protect her. Like any other big brother would do.
Lauren Dubois is Mamamia’s Canberra-based political contributor. You can follow her on Twitter here.








Comments
83 Comments so far
This makes me furious. Why are people applauding Tony Abbott for accepting his sister’s homosexuality? Its not like he has just agreed to adopt a child from a third world country to raise as his own.
If he is against gay marriage then isn’t it obvious why he is doing this???? To get god damn brownie points with the people who will stand there long enough to hear him spill his BS!
I feel like praising someone for accepting that their sister is gay is setting homosexuals back by years, to a time when a lot of people believed that being gay meant there was something wrong with them.
No tony, you are not a better man & I hope that you can find a way to treat ALL people with dignity & respect by realizing that your outdated religion does not own the rights to marriage!
And for Tony’s sister, to still associate with someone who thinks that you (a human being) should not have the right to marry the person that you love, just baffles me…
loading...
Carl Katter’s choice to go public was ‘airing very dirty laundry’ but Tony Abbott concealing his sister’s public disclosure from last year and eventual scripted interview on the weekend is brave. Hmmmn. I’m just glad Katter didn’t seek to gain political mileage from his brother like Abbott is doing with his sister.
loading...
Once again a superb article from Lauren giving us an insight into the other side of our Politicians.
I applaud Tony Abbott on keeping this a private matter within his family, brothers usually get a hard time from their sisters for anything, but, despite his obvious misgivings on this subject he protected his sister at all costs!!
Well done Tony !!
loading...
Hi Lauren, thank you for this piece. It’s really well written and shows an unexpected side and humanity to Tony Abbott. I never thought I’d say that, or that I would find myself applauding his approach to something (in this case his approach to his sister, not to gay marriage – which I fully support).
best wishes
Shankari
loading...
Tony Abbott seems like a decent human being to me, and yes, I’m female. I don’t always agree with his politics but most personal, family stuff I’ve read about him over the past ten years or so have made me think that he is a good husband and father. It sounds like his wife and adult daughters keep him pretty grounded and informed on women’s views. He’s pretty outnumbered at home! He’ll probably get my vote.
loading...
Who is middle Australia? Surely they have gay siblings too. Why do politicians assume it is such a big issue. Let’s move on. I feel like we are being worn down so we won’t care and the general population will be anti-gay marriage because they are sick of people banging
on about it.
loading...
Lauren, how ’bout an expose on the weirdness that is Bob Brown? Many have known for years that he is deluded but his latest ramblings on Earthians and One World Government need massive exposure.
Queenslanders have obviously woken up. With the election not far away it’s time to expose the Greens for the lunatics they are.
loading...
I really enjoyed reading this piece Lauren, it was really well written.
On a personal level I’m not an Abbott fan but a member of my family worked for Mr Abbott for years and she is always highly complimentary on what a great father and husband he is.
loading...
I’ve always thought, seeing his daughters stand so proudly around him, that he must be a true family man.
loading...
One of his daughters considers him a ‘gay, lame, churchy loser’.
loading...
That was her opinion some time back, I believe. I wonder why no one has asked her for an updated opinion ?
Yes. I wonder why that is ?
loading...
yeah cause teenage daugthers the world over always think their dads are the coolest people on the planet….this is the worst ever reponse from Tony Abbott haters. Get over it!
loading...
I’m not religious and yet I got married. Marriage is no longer only a religious ceremony. Religion does not “own” the rights to marriage. The ceremony of Marriage is clearly different things to different people. I fail to see why some religious organisations claim the right to regulate it? I’m not telling them how to get married or who can and cannot get married, I don’t have any more right than they do.
For my husband and I marriage was a celebration of our union in front of friends and family as it is for many many people. A public commitment which is very important for so many people. Of course it is a legal ceremony also, giving me and him certain rights.
If Tony’s sister wants to be Married, why can’t she? Why is religion still making decisions in law? Religion and Law in this day and age should not be joined in any way, particularly when there are so many different religions present in Australia with all different restrictions, it’s ridiculous. Each to their own.
loading...
Lovely comment, I fully agree.
loading...
Here here!
loading...
Yes, it would have been easy for Tony Abbott to say that he knows what he’s talking about on gay marriage or eqaulity because his sister is gay, but I’m not sure if he refrained out of respect for her privacy (it woudl appear after this weekend that she’s not shy of publicity) or the worry that it would interfere with his finely honed message of No, no, no (with an occasional ‘none of that please’ thrown in).
Even if it were, it is a very low level of respect – yes he looks out for his little sister, but does not think that she is equal.
Surely on the scale of respect believing your sister does not deserve the same rights as you has to be in a different category to not mentioning she is gay at a time that suited him (‘in the heat of the moment’ as he would say)
loading...
It seems to me that people are deliberately trying to muddy the waters on issues by throwing around the lefty name calling weapon. If you disagree with homosexual marriage then you are labelled ‘homophobic.’ That is a nonsense. Homophbia is the ‘fear’ of homosexuals and homosexual activity. I haven’t met an adult in the last two decades who is homophobic. Because someone doesn’t agree with homosexual marriage doesn’t mean that they shun gays or judge them or view them as inferior and unworthy human beings! It is ridiculous.
The other issue is illegal boat arrivals. Shutting down debate by labeling people ‘racist’ is so obvious that it would be laughable were it not so serious.
loading...
But to me, it must be homophobic. Because why else would you be against it if you were not scared of it?
I have not met one adult who is against gay marriage and can give me a legitimate reason why.
In this area there should be no debate to shut down. Equality is needed, and I’m sick and tired of having to go on about it. Especially when the overwhelming majority of the population is with me, why won’t the government just legalise it already!?
loading...
abbott’s legitimate reason is that it is against the rules of his religion.
loading...
see my comment below. Using religion as an excuse for homophobia is NOT a legitimate reason. What happened to “love your neighbour as I have loved you”?
It pisses me off when people use religion to spread hatred and disdain.
In Australia, marriage is a legal union between people. LEGAL. not religious. If it was purely a religious union, then atheists and buddists, and muslims etc etc wouldn’t be able to get married. but they do, so that makes the argument “It’s against God / christian belief / religion / Whatever” redundant.
loading...
You might like to read about islam’s teachings re homosexuals before going off about Christian churches! Gays don’t live long enough to get married!
loading...
But marriage isn’t purely a Catholic church matter – or any church, or indeed any religion. It is also a state matter: what else do you think civil celebrants and/or registry weddings are about?
loading...
Boat arrivals are not illegal. Please check your facts.
loading...
Illegals, according to the UN. As someone with inside dealings with detention centers, I agree with them.
loading...
it is legal to seek asylum by boat in Australia (Australian Migration Act 1958)
loading...
For real Anon? “Lefty name calling weapon”, then “The other issue is illegal boat arrivals”. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle beige to me, or maybe you’d just prefer the term xenophobic? I’ll allow the other responses clarify what’s wrong with your notion of those who come to Australia by boat.
By the way, no one mentioned homophobia in these posts until you came along. You protest too much.
loading...
I really enjoy your writing, Lauren. If I could just point out one thing though: ‘But the would-be Priest has embraced his sister’s lifestyle. He loves her, no matter what.’ I don’t mean to be preachy, but ‘lifestyle’ is a term that makes me cringe when it comes to discussions about LGBT people. The reason why, is that it is often used by homophobes to ‘other’ gay people (and I know that that was not your intention at all), since one does not refer to living in a heterosexual relationship as living a certain ‘lifestyle’. Just a sidenote. Totally agree on your analysis about middle Australia.
loading...
I don’t have a fondness for Abbott, but definitely respect how he kept his sister out of it (I’m still not sure how/why it’s come out?). But yeah, it especially made me cringe that even Christina used the phrase “lifestyle choices”. Ugh.
loading...
That was my immediate thought also. It is not a ‘lifestyle’ or a ‘choice’ any more than being left-handed or green-eyed or pigeon-toed. By calling it that it feels like Christine is conceding to Tony a bit, or something… I’m not being very articulate today but I hope you’re picking up what I’m putting down!
loading...
Hi M, the story came out because Christine was photographed at a same-sex marriage event (the photo at the top). When people put two and two together, they realised it was Tony Abbott’s sister. When she was contacted by media, she decided to make her relationship public. Tony Abbott, had managed to keep it quiet prior to this, to protect her four children from her previous marriage. So this was her decision to make it public.
loading...
“When she was contacted by media, she decided to make her relationship public.”
But then:
“Tony Abbott, had managed to keep it quiet prior to this, to protect her four children from her previous marriage. ”
Why is it Abbott’s responsibility to “keep it quiet”? To override her initial decision “to make her relationship public”? I do not buy your assertion of “to protect her four children from her previous marriage.” Surely as the mother of those children, Christine – who went public last year – was the one to make that decision, not her brother. Or is there something else to this that is actually newsworthy?
Clearly the point of this piece is to soften Abbott in the eyes of your predominantly female readership by showing what an awesome brother/husband/father/all-round-family-man he is, and while I think such an endeavor is dangerous to women in terms of his known politics, I’m cool with your right to do so. Just disappointed with your choosing to ignore elements of this story that would be of more interest, like why despite his great love for his sister, his religious conviction takes precedence over her right to equality (and what the extended effect of this might be should he be leader of a Liberal government)? Or what it must be like for her to hear his public views on homosexuality and marriage equality (and those of his party and his church)? Or why it might have prudent for party politics and his known overriding political ambition to “keep it quiet”?
loading...
Wow, that’s the first time I’ve ever seen Mamamia accused of a puff piece on Tony Abbott!
I actually read “managed to keep it quiet” as a way for him to NOT have to answer questions like “Um, your sister is a lesbian in a stable relationship and supports same sex marriage, why don’t you want you sister to have the same rights as you?”
loading...
I wonder how it couldn’t be interpreted as a puff piece for Tony Abbott? Especially after reading comments here of the ‘he’s a nice guy, he’ll get my vote’ nature.
The question you’ve offered is precisely what I was angling at as to part of a bigger reason for ‘keeping quiet’. Is it not reasonable to hold that he would prefer not to expose his hypocrisy – in this case, either personal or political? Lauren pointed this out above in the case of the political with ‘The cries of hypocrisy would be deafening.’ To then suggest ‘he kept her confidence to protect her. Like any other big brother would do’ is disingenuous.
I enjoy reading MamaMia and consider it part of my non mainstream media consumption. Which is why is was pretty surprised, shocked and disgusted to find a ‘gee that Tony’s a nice bloke’ piece here.
loading...
Oh the TA supporters would think it’s a balanced piece of writing.
I don’t think Lauren is a supporter, but I don’t have a problem with showing a different side to what we’re used to. I loathe Amanda Vanstone’s politics for example, but I really like her. Maybe Lauren is the same about TA?
I must admit I’m yet to find anything I agree with him about.
My comment was more just being surprised at MM being accused of a LNP puff piece, usually it’s their side with the “TA haters!!!!” comments. It stood out, really!
loading...
Maybe he “kept it quiet” because his sister’s sexual orientation is nobody’s business but hers ? Perhaps he “kept it quiet” because it is not his right to out his sister….or anyone else for that matter ?
Please consider.
loading...
to Bradely… I agree that he doesn’t have the right to out his sister.
However, Christine went public in July 2011, yet it takes until April 2012 for it to reach the mainstream media? Someone with friends in high places “kept it quiet”… I wonder whom?
loading...
Hi Mae West. I disagree that Abbott has “friends in high places” who deliberately kept this story hidden.
Much of the MSM has deliberately gone out of it’s way to bash Abbott at every opportunity. Certainly this story would have provided it with fodder that would have been served up with gravy and three veg as soon as possible, even though the media has no right to out anyone.
You might say that since Sunday when many of the daily’s reported the matter….dinner has well and truly been on the table and the pudding is on the hob, simmering away. Custard or icecream with the pud ?
loading...
Bradley… Abbott being bashed in the mainstream media? Come on. The last ‘bashing’ I can recall was him being called on his misogynistic attitude in his parroting stupid comments from Greer on QandA about the elected PM. He was able to get out of this gaffe with yet another ‘shit happens’ type remark. It would be going too far to suggest that the MSM is little more than a mouthpiece for the opposition and Abbott, but considering that they get the first and last word on a majority of issues concerning the government in the MSM and receive little to no probing on their own policy or alternative, it isn’t too much of a stretch.
loading...
@ Mae, if you really believe that the MSM is the mouthpiece of the opposition….then words completely fail me.
loading...
Bradley, you’ll note that I said it was going too far. To assert that he is under continual attack by the MSM is plainly absurd.
loading...
(though perhaps our perceptions of the MSM would be of interest to the folk from the Finkelstein inquiry… i see the MSM pander to him and you seem to see them as persecuting him. Surely our sources aren’t that divergent?)
loading...
Sorry, AJS, it actually makes me cringe a little bit too, but in the absence of any phrase that didn’t make me cringe, I went with what Christine had said. I’d love your advice on what might sound better…??
loading...
Hi Lauren, Thanks for taking the time to not only reply, but ask for suggestions. I really appreciate it. My suggestion would be:
‘But the would-be Priest accepts his sister’s sexual orientation. He loves her, no matter what.’
loading...
Why do you find it necessary to use the term “would-be priest” ?
I’m not religious and I support same sex marriage, yet I find your reference as offensive as I would find “gay” prefacing every future reference to Abbott’s sister.
I really don’t mind that Abbott once toyed with the priesthood and I’m not peturbed that his sister is gay.
loading...
The first instance of ‘would be priest’ occurs in paragraph 9 of the article. Perhaps AJS chose to use language from the article to frame her alternative? Though to my mind, ‘lifestyle’ doesn’t require an alternative, but removal. Christine’s quoted sentence should have ended after the word ‘me’; however, it was said.
loading...
Thanks Mae. Bradley, all I was doing was changing the bit that I had deemed problematic: ‘lifestyle’. I thought I’d leave it up to Lauren to decide the rest.
loading...
You’re welcome, AJS
However, it appears that Bradley is trolling rather than genuinely asking questions.
loading...
Let me disappoint you, Mae.
I am asking genuine questions. If you choose to see it as something else, then that is your prerogative. I notice that the questions I’ve asked haven’t been answered……
loading...
Restate them, Bradley. I believe I have responded to your questions, but I am happy to be corrected.
loading...
Why all the kudos for him treating his family decently and not exposing their lives to the press? Is the standard for Tony so low, that we will sing his praises when he treats those close to him well? When he extends the same compassion to the rest of the society he wishes to lead, then maybe I’ll be prepared to give him a pat on the back. In the meantime, the revelation that he has a gay sister leaves me feeling even more disgusted by his personal attitudes towards marraige equality. Someone who will fight to deny even their own sister equal rights, is a digraceful excuse for a human being in my book.
loading...
I think it shows that people are complex, and that nuances are lost when they are reduced to black and white arguments. I think it shows that a media soundbite is overly simplistic, and that when politicians bow to this, the result is ordinary to say the least.
I find it hard to reconcile his lack of support for gay marriage with his support for his sister, and I imagine he finds it hard to reconcile his faith with his sister’s sexuality. I would love it if he could realign all of these things, but I life (and politics!) isn’t quite that neat.
I am (somewhat)reassured that he has a loving relationship with his sister, and that his dismissal of gay marriage isn’t as simplistic as I had previously assumed it to be.
loading...
Danni , people opposed to gay marriage would argue it is not a question of equal rights but eligibilty.
e.g. you have to be Jewish to do your bar mitvah. You have to be Catholic to receive communion. you have to be disabled to get the disability pension.etc
Marriage has always been defined as between a man and a woman.
Certainly gays and lesbians can have committed relationships but they don’t fit the definition of what marriage has meant.
loading...
No it hasn’t. John Howard changed the legislation to specify man and woman. Before it was changed it didn’t actually specify that.
Maybe in religious rules about marriage it did, but not legally. And marriage is a legal thing that can also be religious. Not the other way round.
loading...
I’m talking about what marriage has meant to the man in the street when the word marriage has been mentioned, not Australian legislation. The push for gay marriage is only recent phenomenon, for aeons marriage has been thought of as a heterosexual instituion.
Marriage is secular, but for some people it is also religious
loading...
This annoys me more than anything.
Today, it is a legal construct, and yet people still cry on about religion. If atheists can be wed, then why can’t gays?!!
Hypocrisy. But, I find hypocrisy in most areas of religion.
loading...
I agree with Catherine. I am against gay marriage but I understand and accept same sex relationships. My point of view is not based on religion, rather eligibility. Catherine’s examples are perfect – my son’s aren’t Jewish, so I don’t expect them to have a bar mitzvah, I don’t take Communion as I’m not Catholic – and there are many other traditions I don’t expect to be a part of simply because I am not eligible. Is that not good enough reason that I feel that marriage should remain between a woman and a man?
loading...
Up until not that long ago, women didn’t vote or hold bank accounts or loans in their own names, or work after marriage. Lets get rid of all that untraditional crap too, eh wot?
loading...
I don’t mean to be disrespectful, but no it’s not a good enough reason, because bar mitzvah’s and communions are not legal ceremonies.
Using religion as an excuse for the continuation of homophobic or sexist behaviour is unacceptable
loading...
I think this is a perfect example of the limitations of political discussion, of how it reduces everything to black and white. Tony is anti-gay marriage so everyone assumes he hates gay people when this is clearly not the case. This poverty of debate encourages vitriol from the electorate which then leads to poverty of leadership as our politicians scramble for the safety of a ‘side’ to be on. Democracy has been reduced to a vicious circle which is not doing us any favors as a society. This is why I prefer to seek my nuggets of wisdom in books (and on mamamia of course, lol.)
loading...
Tanlee, you are so spot on it hurts.
loading...
On the one hand, this gives me an inkling of respect for Tony Abbot for the first time, well, ever.
On the other hand, I am repulsed that the man still thinks it’s acceptable for his religious views to impact on his policies.
loading...
So what do you think impacts on Julia Gillard’s anti-marriage stance? Marriage is seen as a religious institution and of course Abbott’s religious views are going to play a role in his point of view. I see it that he supports his sister’s love for her partner but not for them to marry. This revelation has shown him to have more integrity than we can ever hope to see in Julia.
loading...
You have got to be kidding.. I know Abbott personally. He is a MORON and a compulsive liar.
FACT
He is only doing this to appear human
FAIL
loading...
I wonder what Tony Abbott thinks about Rod ?
He knows also knows him personally.
loading...
Peoples views have to come from somewhere – and if his come from his religion, so be it.
In saying that, if he changed his mind, his party may not follow suit (and the same goes for if gillard changed hers). The head of the party does not not control the sentiments of the party. In essence, both parties are conservative on this issue as a whole – with a few notable exceptions.
I’m mostly impressed that he can be both supportive of his sister, and stick with his beliefs. I dont agree with the party policy on gay marriage, but it doesnt make his integrity any less commendable.
loading...
“Religious institution”…exactly. A religious institution, does that mean that atheists and non-religious people around the world also shouldn’t have the right to marry? No. To base something on religion, which is based on belief of something that can’t be proved? It needs to change. It all needs to change.
loading...
To be perfectly clear, you quoted me as saying ‘religious institution’ , which never once appeared in my comment.
Anyway, I dont care where you get your ideas from. I dont care if someone bases their personal morals on the existance of santa claus. Find your inspiration for your beliefs wherever you chose.
I would care if Tony Abbott addressed the haters with ‘Hang on – my sister is gay, im not a homophobe!’. His sister made the announcement herself, when she was ready. He wasnt self serving.
Also, if you want to blame religion, what is J.Gillards excuse for not supporting gay marriage? Shes not religious. She just doesnt like the idea – and again, so be it. Oh and Im catholic but i support gay marriage. I dont beleive the church has the right to influence what happens outside of their own followers.
When the world finally comes around to allowing gay people to marry like the heterosexuals, it will be for a lot of reasons.
People have their own reasons. Be respectful of them, even if they arent reasons you agree with. Trashing their beliefs unsurprisingly wont get them to see eye to eye with you.
loading...
One can oppose the notion of gay marriage without having any religious beliefs. Traditionally marriage has been about children and protecting their rights etc. We traditionally have had a family unit of a mother and father raising their biological children. Gay and lesbian marriages , the access of gay and lesbian couples to reproductive technology is fostering the belief that children don’t need their biological parents, don’t need to know who they are, don’t need to have relationships with them etc. However, we know from adoption studies, donor gamete created children now adults that some people are desperate to know their biological parents, have relationships with them. Why create more problems?
loading...
These babies will still be born, regardless of their parents being married or not. Frankly I think the idea that a child is so wanted and will be cared for a much nicer thought than the derros down the street having a child accidentally and not actually taking care of it. Now THAT is a problem. All kids should be lucky enough to be wanted that much that they are ‘created’.
It is not a given that a ‘natural’ mother and father make for a happy family. It’s 2012, let’s get real about how diverse families are these days! Change is not a bad thing.
loading...
so are you saying no one should be allowed to adopt or use reproductive technology, or just that gay people shouldn’t?
there are far worse things in this world than 2 loving people being given the opportunity to raise a child together.
loading...
Tony Abbott says everyone should be treated with dignity and respect….
but look at his stance on refugees, women’s place, indigenous rights, marriage equality…..
…..I think he means every middle class white man should be.
loading...
Erm….
“It would have been terribly easy for him to say, ‘You don’t know everything about me. I do know what I’m talking about. My sister is gay.’
But he never did. He kept her confidence to protect her.”
Until now…
loading...
Erm…Corey…Christine made the decision to let the public know, not Tony.
loading...
Bedlam is correct. Tony Abbott actually buried this story successfully a couple of years ago. He managed to convince the journalist who found out, that his sister should be allowed to live her life privately. On this occasion however, his sister was photographed at a same-sex marriage event and when contacted about it, she decided to admit publicly that she was gay, and Tony Abbott’s sister. He didn’t want her dragged into the public eye like this.
loading...
Congratulations to the Abbott spin machine – looks ilke it’s worked.
His popularity, particularly with female voters, was pretty darn low, seems this is already working to get those pesky women onside.
Now it looks like he can use the all too often used ‘..I’m not racist/homophobic/sexist, I have an indigenous/gay/transgendered/female sister/brother/friend’
Ughhhhhhhhhhhh..
His views are still the same old right wing, ultra-conservative, Christian views they’ve always been, only now we know he loves his sister (and I think that’s lovely).
All this shows is that he’s not willing to support his sister in equal marrige rights because he would rather support those right wing, ultra-conservative Christian views that he believes gets him votes.
loading...
His has never been unpopular with women. That’s just more spin and mirrors. He is a thoroughly decent man and most women see beyond the ludicrous stereotype painted by the media.
loading...
That’s like saying that Julia Gliiard isn’t really all that unpopular, it’s just media spin and biased opinion polls!
loading...
Tony Abbott’s job is to represent his political party’s stance on leading issues, not as an omnipotent leader who dictates. The situation with his sister couldn’t demonstrate this any better. I’m sure he would do anything for his sister, but changing a party’s stance to facilitate her lifestyle couldn’t be one of them! This all ties in with the hysteria portrayed by many readers here that TA will set this country back to the 50′s (whatever that means). The fact that he holds traditional conservative personal views does not, and should not, hold that he wants us all to think or be the same. Same goes for Julia Gillard. She is castigated as a liar for the most part, but she is towing her party line. I don’t think anyone can believe for a minute that she is the mastermind of all the policies, good and bad, for the duration of her leadership!
loading...
Exactly! They’re not the views he “believes will get him votes”. They’re the views that *got* him votes in the past, so he continues to represent those who *asked* him to represent them (i.e. voted for him). To do otherwise, would be hypocritical, and unethical as a public servant.
I have never voted liberal, but this has made me see a more 3D view of Tony Abbott, and I may spend a *little* longer listening to his statements and policies since hearing this news… he at least seems to have a clear concept of the integrity required in public office!
loading...
Good use of the word ‘pugilistic’.
I think I have found my new favourite word.
loading...
this is interesting cos I have always thought: yes, but if I could have a perfect and frank discussion with him (or anyone who disagrees with me), I would be able to change his mind cos I could explain how people really feel.
But it appears he has already had such a discussion, and with someone who he (presumably) cares for deeply. And he still doesn’t change his mind.
loading...
I went to an engagement party last week. The father of the (soon to be) groom made a speech, the father of the bride made a speech, and then the brides 2 mothers came on to the stage and the ‘step’ mum made a tearful and moving speech about how her greek heritage had been welcomed into the extended family and had allowed them all to celebrate with her ‘greek’ gusto. I was unaware of the bride to be’s family history, and was so pleasently surprised at how beautiful and diverse her loving family were. I am close to the grooms side but have known the bride to be as part of the family for as long as I remember.
I am all for marriage equality, always have been and witnessing this moving family gathering only confirmed for me that love is love, no matter what form.
And on the subject of teachers ‘being normal human beings’ my year 6 teacher invited my younger siblings and i over for dinner one night and it opened up my eyes, they watched countdown and had a dishwasher (we did not) and my youngest sister was allowed to press the on button and was so proud to tell our parents that SHE did the dishes. Yes, although she was a strict but caring teacher she was normal and watched music videos like i did
loading...
What a great article. So respectfully handled.
This makes me like Tony Abbot …. for the very first time.
loading...