news

Doctor Chamari Liyanage, who killed abusive husband with mallet, appeals to Peter Dutton to stay in Australia.

A Sri Lankan-born doctor who bludgeoned her husband to death with a mallet after years of abuse is appealing to the Immigration Minister to allow her to stay in Australia after serving her sentence.

She was acquitted of the more serious charge of murder and has been eligible to apply for parole since June.

Her application for parole is due to be heard early next year but if granted, she is likely to be moved into immigration detention and could be deported because her visa was cancelled whilst behind bars.

In an appeal to Peter Dutton obtained by 7.30, Liyanage said she took full responsibility for what had happened and there was little to no chance of her reoffending.

“I would also like you to consider my personal circumstances leading to the offence,” she wrote.

“I was a victim of long term abusive and violent relationship and I believe that my judgement had been affected and considerably impaired at the time.”

Liyanage said she feared for her safety if deported to Sri Lanka.

“I am afraid and concern (sic) about safety of my family in Sri Lanka if I have to return home,” she wrote.

“My presence, media publicity and stigma associated with this case will bring hostilities towards my family … I am worried that will jeopardise the lives of my family.”

Liyanage lived ‘double life’.

During her trial, the court heard the couple’s five-year marriage was defined by the “worst kind” of escalating sexual, physical and emotional abuse.

Liyanage’s immigration lawyer, Alisdair Putt, said her client was living a “double life”.

“On the one hand, she was a very well-respected and intelligent medical practitioner who worked extremely hard on behalf of patients often in a life-saving role,” he said.

“But on the other hand, she was part of a very violent and abusive manipulative relationship with her former partner that did cause considerable stress.”

Even her closest friends had little clue about what was going on behind the closed doors of her Geraldton home.

Di Budge said she was shocked when she learned the details of her friend’s marriage.

“The thing that caused the biggest shame — he used to wake her in the early hours for his Skype sessions, these websites where they exchange videos, porn videos,” she said.

“And he used to trade videos of her with whatever he was looking at. He was into kiddy porn, doggy porn.”

The court heard her husband, Dinendra Athukorala, kept 13 terabytes of encrypted child exploitation and bestiality images.

Fears over possible deportation.

Ms Budge said she would be concerned for her friend’s safety if she was forced to return to Sri Lanka.

“We really are terrified of that possibility because it would be to a very uncertain future if she went back there,” she said.

“And not only just for her, I think she’s more worried for her own family.”

She said she hoped Mr Dutton would consider her Liyanage’s appeal.

“She wasn’t an illegal immigrant in the first place, she was welcomed to Australia as a qualified professional and the events as they unfolded since her arrival have been outside of her control,” she said.

“She’s already suffered enough and she’s already paid the penalty.

“Why would they even consider sending her back to Sri Lanka where it could start all over again?”

Mr Putt said his client was at no risk to the country and should be allowed to stay.

“I mean we can understand that the Australian community does need to be protected from violent offenders but I think that’s very different from a case where a woman who’s been in an enormously violent and abusive relationship finally snaps,” he said.

“I think that’s a different situation and I think that’s what she’s saying to the Minister.”

Mr Dutton said he was unable to comment as Liyanage’s request to reverse her visa cancellation was under review.

This post originally appeared on ABC News.

© 2016 Australian Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved. Read the ABC Disclaimer here.

Tags: abuse

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Guest 7 years ago

She clearly did not leave her husband due to fear of his retribution should she do so. If these claims of his abuse can be substantiated, or have been noted by the judge which appears to be the case due to the lenient sentence she was given, then surely we can have compassion in this case. She also states she has fears of retribution should she return to her home country. Although I am usually all for deportation if you have committed a crime, surely these individual circumstances should be taken into account. I can't see any benefit to her being sent away from this country when she can add value by practicing medicine.


antipop 7 years ago

Just the other day i met a woman who had killed her husband. She had not long been realised from jail. Her history of abuse was heartbreaking. She was happy to go to jail to receive help and finally feel safe after decades of haunting abuse. Now out, she didn't want her ankle brace removed either as she was heartbroken that she finally snapped and killed him. She still loves him.

It was such an eye-opening conversation. (I was a bit skeptical as she told me so much about her life and i was merely a stranger that just happened to sit down next to her, i googled her when i got home, all true info on public record, it's absolutely devastating what a lot of women experience at the hands of their loved ones.)

I share this because I was not threatened by her, and I feel the same way about the woman in this article.