news

Why the Prime Minister's visit to Arnhem Land is nothing but window dressing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

By ALYS GAGNON

With our Prime Minister spending a week in Arnhem Land right now, one could be forgiven for thinking that here we have a leader truly committed to closing the gap for Indigenous Australians.

Before he was elected Prime Minister, Tony Abbott promised to spend one week every year embedded in a remote indigenous community. A worthy and important attempt to bring indigenous issues to the forefront of political debate and demonstrate his commitment to the policy area.

“I think it would be a very instructive thing for a prime minister and senior officials of the Government to spend a week here [Arnhem Land] to learn what it is like to live, to train, to study in this area,” he said during last year’s election campaign.

And true to his word Mr Abbott is currently embedded with the Yolgnu community in Gulkula, in the north east of the Northern Territory.

Now, I have no doubt that Prime Minister Abbott has an honest wish to address the issues that confront Indigenous communities, remote and suburban, across the country. You could hardly be human and not be moved to want to do something when you understand the statistics on life expectancy, education attainment levels, health outcomes to name a few of the factors that impact on Indigenous life in Australia.

For example, the Australian Institute for Health and Welfare has found that, “for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

population born in 2010-2012, life expectancy was estimated to be 10.6 years lower than that of the non-Indigenous population for males (69.1 years compared with 79.7) and 9.5 years for females (73.7 compared with 83.1).”

However, in the face of $534 million of cuts to Indigenous programs announced in the last budget, it’s hard to view this week as anything more than a cute opportunity for the Prime Minister to get some photos in an Indigenous community.

These cuts will hit everything from Indigenous health and welfare programs, to education initiatives, job and employment services, and early intervention childhood services.

 

In fact, just as Mr Abbott arrived in Arnhem Land two days ago, Fairfax newspapers reported on the situation of the 38 Aboriginal Child and Family Centres who find themselves in limbo following funding cuts in June.

Let’s be very clear about what these centres do.

They provide early intervention health and family services for young Indigenous children who are at risk. They help families get their children to school, get access to the health services they need, provide parenting programs for mums and dads who might happen to need a bit of extra support and advice – as many of us do from time to time.

Importantly, the provide an alternative to the mainstream services of which many Indigenous people are wary of using for fear that their families will be broken up.

This week’s visit also comes with speculation that the Government may postpone the referendum to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution. Constitutional recognition represents an important step in the movement for reconciliation and it’s been put off for far too long already.

The Prime Minister needs to more than just be seen spending a week with Indigenous Australians.

He needs to walk the talk, stump up the funding so urgently required to address the serious issues faced by Indigenous Australians and take a true step towards reconciliation.

Anything less renders his current visit to remote communities a token gesture; window dressing of which Mr Abbott ought to be ashamed.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Stepper 10 years ago

I found the article biased and ill informed. Why should Tony Abbott feel ashamed? Why is the visit a token jesture?

Remember Bob Collins - he committed suicide. He was also facing child sex charges. This will give victims an opportunity to speak about the experiences. The Rudd government did not pursue it.

Is it a coincidience that an announcement of the extension to the royal commission into child sexual abuse received a two year. This was announced before he went Arnhem Land. To be fair this did have bi partisan support.
With regards to employment which government was it that put a ban on the live cattle trade. This impacted largely om Aboriginal people.
Why can't Aboriginal people own and operate a cattle station.


Emma 10 years ago

To be honest, I feel like there are a million more important issues facing our nation right now. He promised he would go, he went, he delivered, and still not enough.

And yet we still get the 'hail Julia' articles on this website and she is long gone!

Bright 10 years ago

Really? "A million more important things" than the seemingly never-ending inequity faced by indigenous Australians every day? No, simply going is not enough. Something this article explained quite well.

Mum of two cheeky monkeys 10 years ago

I'm pretty sure that's not what Emma meant and I'm pretty sure you know that. I think she's saying there are more important things than a click bait story about the travel plans of the prime minister. As she said, he promised he would go and he's going.

Luna Laflue 10 years ago

This isn't "click bait" poverty and inequality might not be as quick as a bullet to the brain. But this is violence all the same, he is advocating poverty, in the names of his lobbyists and you know what we are just getting sick of this.