news

Schapelle Corby shares a picture from her hospital bed after suffering a major injury.

Less than two months on from returning to Australia, convicted drug smuggler Schapelle Corby is in hospital after seriously injuring herself.

“Hi guys. This is why you haven’t seen me in a while…..” the 39-year-old said in an Instagram caption posted on Thursday.

Alongside the caption were the hashtags #sickbay #brokenleg #brokenankle and #brokenknee.

In the image, Corby can be seen resting in a hospital bed with much of her leg and knee being iced.

As to exactly when or how she injured herself, we still don’t know.

Corby returned to Australia in late May after 12 years in Bali – nine of which were spent in Kerokoban prison – where the former beautician was serving her jail sentence for smuggling 4.2 kilograms of cannabis into Bali.

Despite being found guilty and convicted in 2005, Corby has always maintained her innocence.

Listen: Mamamia Out Loud discuss the interest in Schapelle Corby’s return. Post continues… 

In the days leading up to Corby’s return to her family home in Queensland, she created an Instagram account to document her journey back and share information on causes close to her heart.

Since creating her account, Corby has amassed 197,000 followers.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Mark 7 years ago

She was guilty that's why she served all that time in jail.
Tim Lindsay is a professor of Asian law.
ELEANOR HALL: Is it the case that the Indonesian legal system is based on the presumption of guilt?

TIM LINDSAY: No, that is completely false. As a matter of fact it is completely the opposite. The system in Indonesia is the same as the system in Australia, and our Commonwealth system. Article 66 of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically states that the burden of proof to prove guilt in a criminal case lies with the prosecution


Salem Saberhagen 7 years ago

"Despite being found guilty" This type of biased rubbish always makes me scream! She was NOT 'found' guilty. In Indonesia's system, the onus is on the Defendant to prove their innocence, NOT on the court to PROVE guilt. She was not found guilty. The court declared her guilty because Schapelle (despite begging for CCTV footage that mysteriously went missing at all three airports her bag went through) couldn't *prove* she was innocent.

anon 7 years ago

i think you are being bit pedantic about wording, i can't see what the difference is between found guilty and declared guilty