news

"I won't be praising anything the Pope has to say."

 

By SIMON COPLAND

When Pope Francis was installed earlier this year many were hoping for a shift in the church’s tone towards homosexuality. It seems like we may have got our wish. In a wide-ranging interview over the weekend, Francis, it was reported, reached out to homosexuals. He said:

“If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?”

The Pope has quickly received praise for his comments.

Reverand James Martin commented that ”Pope Francis’s brief comment on gays reveals great mercy.”

Here at home, Australian Marriage Equality said: “While the Pope still opposes marriage equality and thinks homosexual sex is sinful, he has opened up a space for discussion about these issues that did not exist under his predecessors.”

“This is glasnost for gay Catholics.”

I can see why people are happy. His statement is more progressive than anything that ever seemed to come out of Pope Benedict XVI’s mouth. It definitely is a shift from the past years. But unfortunately I’m going to have to hold back from my cheering.

I think the reason Francis’ statement seems so great is because of the difference between him and his predecessor. Benedict, a rampant homophobe, did not hold back during his leadership. At one point he said that homosexuality was as much of a threat to the survival of the human race as climate change. Being better than that is certainly not a high bar to jump over.

And when you look at it, it’s not really a bar that Francis is working hard to jump over. In fact his language over the weekend doesn’t actually represent any real shift in direction. As John Allen states:

It’s always been on the books in the Catholic Church that homosexual persons are to be treated with love. The Catechism, the official collection of Catholic doctrine, states that gays should always receive “’respect, compassion and sensitivity.”

In other words, the Pope has simple reiterated Catholic doctrine – the very same doctrine that Pope Benedict lived by.

And it is in seeing this context that we realise that this is in no way a progressive shift at all. For example, whilst he has been kind enough to say that he will not judge gay people, Francis has still emphasised that homosexual acts are a sin. He may not want to judge us, but but he will still considers our acts as sinful. We may deserve forgiveness, but we are still sinners. And if we do not seek redemption, we will still go to hell for those sins.

And this reality plays out in the fact that Francis does not look like he will be changing any Church positions any time soon. For example, in the interview Francis said that the “door is closed” on allowing women to be ordained. And he has signaled any more to repeal a policy signed by Pope Benedict that banned men with predominantly same-sex attraction to be admitted to seminaries, and therefore banned them from being ordained as priests.

But it is his various positions on a range of social policy that is the most troubling. Francis still strictly opposes abortion and euthanasia. Before becoming the Pope, he opposed the Argentinian Governments move to promote free contraception – something that causes significant worry given the role the Catholic Church’s opposition to contraception has played in the HIV/AIDs crisis. He has called same-sex marriage a ‘real and dire anthropological throwback’ and opposes same-sex adoption, as he considers it discrimination against children.

And in the interview he made it very clear that this isn’t going to change – the Catholic Church’s policies will stay the same. He was strongest on the ordination of women saying the “door is closed” on the issue. In other words, this is not ‘glasnost for gay Catholics’. The discussion isn’t open. Things will stay the same.

A more conciliatory tone yes, but any real changes, no. Francis may just be a bit nicer about this homophobia.

So in the end what we have is a statement that is just a reiteration of official doctrine by a Pope that still believes homosexuality is a sin. Even though the tone may be more conciliatory this wont come with any changes in the Church’s homophobic beliefs and policies.

During the interview, Pope Francis also commented:

“The catechism of the Catholic Church says clearly that we must not marginalise these people who should be integrated in the society.”

This is the essence of what his position is. Queers should not be marginalised. They should not be judged. They should be ‘integrated’.

You can forgive me for not cheering. I think we deserve a lot better than ‘not being marginalised’ and ‘not being judged’. I think we deserve a lot better than the ongoing homophobic positions promoted by the Catholic Church. And until we get it, I wont be praising anything the Pope has to say.

Simon Copland is a freelance writer, climate campaigner and Science Communications

Masters Student. In his spare time he plays rugby union and is a David Bowie fanatic. He is a regular columnist for the Sydney Star Observer, blogs at The Moonbat  and tweets at @SimonCopland.

Top Comments

Anonymous 10 years ago

Please don't assume that adherence to religious teachings is the same as homophobia. Homophobia is the fear of homosexuality. The bible also instructs believers not to commit adultery. It is also listed as a sin. It is a wrong thing to do and yes, by biblical standards sinful, but to speak against it in line with bible teachings is not demonstrating a fear of adulterers. I'm not saying homophobia is comparable to adultery. I'm saying that biblically it falls into the same list. I'm saying his comments demonstrate a hatred of the sin and not the sinner, which is the best that can be done when you stick to the letter of biblical law. I respect his right as the leader of the Catholic Church to uphold the teachings of his religion. It's also nice to know he thinks that as a human being, even a homosexual one, I deserve some respect also. He thinks I deserve compassion and sensitivity as a sinner as well, but then I think he deserves the same as a man blinded by the letter of biblical law, forgetting the progression which has already occurred in other areas, and the progression of society in regards to treatment of those committing biblical sins.

This is a step in the right direction. It's all I'm asking for. I don't want him to change his religious beliefs because I think they're outdated when applied to my life choices. I just don't want his beliefs to limit my choices, just as I would not dream of having my beliefs limit his.

Make sense?


AD Stephens 11 years ago

"We may deserve forgiveness, but we are still sinners. And if we do not seek redemption, we will still go to hell for those sins."

This statement is a misunderstanding of Catholic teaching. Even the "deserve" part of the first sentence is critically incorrect. So, right there I think we have one of the fundamental issues which is preventing further dialogue. Being Catholic is not about following a rule book, but being in a real relationship with God and his son Jesus through the Holy Spirit. This concept may not mean much to people who do not believe in God but it is a completely different paradigm to the one you are talking about.

The marvellous thing about Pope Francis is that he goes into a dangerous world. He visited the slums of Buenos Aires. "At the weekend", which kind of understates the significance of World Youth Day in Brazil, (3,000,000 people at a mass on Copacabana Beach) he told Bishops and priests to get out of their buildings (and latest model cars and bullet proof Popemobiles) and get into the slums. To get into the lives of people. This is a great message for the Church and his example gives him authority.

I don't have any specific knowledge on gay issues, all I say is that the Catholic faith is about truth, and if you acknowledge your same-sex attraction, then there is an honesty about that which is good. However, there are gay Catholics working at the coalface, examining how they integrate their own gay personality with their Catholic faith. More and more are appearing on the blogosphere. A few good blogs are Mudblood Catholic, Steve Gershom, and Melinda Selmys' "Sexual Authenticity". These are the people who are really digging into the issues that effect them directly and they are going to inform the Church about the way it relates to gay people in our societies. They are at the coalface of gay issues in the Church and their opinion has more weight on these issues than the Popes. They are doing what Pope Francis is preaching to the wider Church about.

So I think it's a shame that you have already made up your mind to ignore him.