news

50,000 people don't think this dad deserved to be arrested. Do you?

Medical cannabis: Where do you sit in this debate?

As the debate surrounding the medical usage of cannabis in Australia wages on, a case involving a father giving his dying daughter cannabis oil to alleviate her symptoms has captured the hearts and minds of many.

Over 50,000 people have now signed a petition to save a man called Adam Koessler, who they’re describing as a “fearless father”.

Koessler was arrested and charged this month, after giving his two-year-old daughter, Rumer Rose, cannabis oil as an alternative treatment for stage four neuroblastoma.

After taking the little girl from Cairns to Brisbane for an oncologist’s appointment.  Koessler was arrested on January 2 at the Lady Cilento Children’s hospital and charged with giving dangerous drugs to a person under 16 and possession.

Koessler claims that after administering the oil with some coconut, little Rumer showed vast signs of improvement.

“Her cancer-ridden little body was alive again,” he told the Newcastle Herald. “I saw first hand that the cannabis oil was extremely beneficial and I hope I simply did what any father would do.”

Koesslar had posted bail to appear in court tomorrow — but part of his bail conditions prohibits the father from contact with his daughter, whose condition has severely worsened since being taken off the treatment.

Little Rumer is now in intensive care, the Newcastle Herald reports.

 

Cannabis activists have rallied behind the father, with an outpouring of support coming through in the name of petitions, Facebook pages and donations.

The Change.org petition asks for Queen Premier  Campbell Newman and justice minster Jarrod Bleijie to intervene in Koessler’s case and “have his parental rights to see his child reinstated, the charges against him dismissed by a court and the right to decide the treatment options  of his own child”.

“It is inhumane and unjust to keep a parent, who acted out of love for his child, wanting to prolong her life, away from her during such severe illness” and that “Medicinal cannabis oil, its supply and use, should be decriminalised in Australia without further delay,” the petition, which now has more than 59,000 signatures, argues.

Adam Koesslar’s arrest comes at a period in which the medical use, along with the legalisation of cannabis is hotly contested. In the US, many states have already started legalising the use of medical cannabis.

Australia looks to follow the US, with the Victoria government moving towards legalising its use by the end of the year and New South Wales running trials with cannabis to treat epileptic children and terminally ill patients. 

What do you think of the use of medical cannabis? Should it be used to treat patients? 

 

Top Comments

Caz Gibson 9 years ago

Medical Cannabis is clearly showing that it can help some people.....some children.

People have developed a superstition about this product and it's pretty childish.

I don't think that it's intended for use INSTEAD of current medical treatments so why not add it to those available ?
Parents with gravely ill children are traumatised enough without removing what just might be an important addition to their child's medical routine.

Drug companies are raking in profits so I can imagine their interference in a product they can't as yet control.
Time to apply some kindness and logic.........and fast.


Anon 9 years ago

While I completely support the legalisation of cannabis for recreational use and think there is some medicinal value in cannabis this situation has me concerned.

Cannabis may be the best course of action for this kid but the dad sounds like some kind of whacko and probably shouldn't be making the call. Of course it could be that the mother is irrationally opposed to using cannabis and the father is the one be logical. In a perfect world the doctor would be able to advise if cannabis is a good idea but that obviously can't happen, at least officially, so the decision must lie with the parents. In the end the whole problem comes back to this absurd prohibition.

Whatever the truth of the situation keeping a dad from his sick child seems a big drastic, surely supervised visits would be a reasonable compromise.