Are calls to boycott this movie justified?
Does liking it make me a shit feminist?
Will there be a little party in my pants area because of the RAUNCH?
Should Dakota’s pubic hair have it’s own twitter account?
TELL ME. HONESTLY. SHOULD I SEE IT?
WE HAVE ANSWERED ALL THESE QUESTIONS. And more.
We’re recorded a special breakout podcast to dissect what everyone’s talking about, yelling about, protesting about and disagreeing about: Fifty Shades of Grey.
Two women in our office with differing views go head to head.
Kate Leaver. Senior Editor. Intrepid journalist and staunch anti-domestic violence campaigner. A gentle, sunshiney soul who hadn’t read the books and didn’t quite know what to expect.
Could a nice face like this be corrupted?
Shelley Horton, Host of Mamamia TV, Channel 7 regular. Gives little -to-no-shits about pulling punches. She loved all three books and told us she devoured them “with one hand.”
The other hand was just turning the page, right Shelley?
It’s a face off. Politically correct Vs politically get-fecht.
If you’re looking for the definitive guide to the drama and controversy this is it.
If you want to know about the sex scenes, you got it.
We have the global reviews, a reponse from the BDSM community, and the wider social message this movie is provoking.
And, above all, the answer to whether you should see it.
It’s a bit like Margaret and David. Except there’s a lot more of the F word.
Download it on itunes here
Download it directly to your computer here.
Or listen, right here, right now.
And if you have no idea what this podcasting caper is all about? Here’s the easy guide to get on board.
Top Comments
I saw the movie this weekend, and have read and loved all three books. I read multiple reviews last week prior to seeing the movie and was very disheartened by them. Most were calling it 'domestic abuse' and a relatively bad movie.
Firstly, I loved the movie. However I'm certain that if I hadn't of read the books, I wouldn't of enjoyed it. Knowing the books and the REAL storyline, it was much easier for me to understand what was going on.
SPOILER ALERT - i.e. When Christian show's Ana the playroom after the first visit to his house - DOESN'T HAPPEN like that in the book. It's week's into their relationship where he had been busy courting her. When Christian buys her a new car and sells off her old one, in the movie it is made out as a controlling gesture whereas in the book he explains that her old car is unsafe and a death trap and he wants to protect her.
I think anyone who is bagging out the movie, needs to read the books to get a full gist of the FULLY consensual relationship they have. As all movies though, the books are always better.
I can't understand how people loved the books with the atrocious writing. I'm not having a go at you Shannon D, I'm genuinely curious - did the terrible writing not put you off?
I read it nearly a year and a half ago now so my memory may not serve me correctly but I don't even remember it being bad. I don't remember stopping during the book and thinking "wow this is poorly written" however my mum read it after I did and she commented on it. I don't know whether when you enjoy the story so much you don't notice or whether maybe I just don't notice bad writing.
I've read the books multiple times and yes the book is poorly written - I'm surprised it actually got past the editors to be honest - but I enjoyed the story, so it was a case of thinking, "yes this is really badly written but I'm enjoying the story so...." and just moving on.
I will admit that the repetitiveness and some of the phrases she used, did cause me to chuckle more than once while reading!