Much like a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma, this is a campaign against a campaign against stick-thin models.
This body-positive advertising campaign, launched last month by plus-sized retailer Lane Bryant, received praise from far and wide. Fierce, happy women looking smoking hot in their underwear and taking a pointed stand against the glossy ‘perfection’ of lingerie brand Victoria’s Secret: What’s not to like?
But it seems, not everybody was happy with it.
Blogger and self-proclaimed international body advocate Jes Baker said that the campaign – called #ImNoAngel, a reference to Victoria’s Secret’s controversial “The Perfect Body” ad slogan – did not show enough body variety. She was concerned that the #ImNoAngel simply replaced one homogenous body type with another and that diversity was sadly missing.
So Jes Baker launched her own.
Partnering with photographer Jade Beall, Jes recreated the images with women of a variety of ages, sizes and ethnicities.
And the results are stunning… Take a look:
Beautiful…
Awesome…
True diversity.
In an open letter to Lane Bryant on her blog, Jes labelled the #ImNoAngel campaign an “empowerment backfire”, saying it showed only one shape — the traditional hourglass figure, where the waistline is considerably smaller than the bust and hips.
“When we, as a society, fail to include diverse bodies in our media, the message becomes clear to those excluded: you are unworthy of taking up space. It’s a powerful message that settles into the core of those who aren’t represented,” she wrote in the letter.
“It’s critical that we #EmpowerALLBodies, and it’s more important to do so than we think.”
Jes asked the company to do more in the future to include real women, women with women with cellulite, bellies, disabilities, stretch marks and wrinkles.
You’ve presented the “ideal” plus body: hourglass, perceivably “healthy”, cellulite free, able bodied, cis-gender, and “conventionally” beautiful. And while I appreciate your conscious inclusion of varying skin tones (and Elly’s scar), I’m going to ask you to consider including some of the following next time: cellulite; 90% of women have it. Bellies; many plus women don’t have flat torsos. All abilities; we’re all inherently sexy. Transgender women; they’re “all woman” too. Small boobs and wide waists; we’re not all “proportional.” Stretch marks and wrinkles; they’re trophies of a life lived. And this is just the beginning!
The images were shared loudly and proudly on social media with the hashtag #EmpowerALLBodies. And Jes was pretty stoked with Lane Bryant’s response.
Image via Twitter
The response from Lane Bryant chief executive Linda Heasley said:
“Yes, we can do even more in supporting women, pushing body confidence and self-esteem amplification as well as making inclusiveness more a part of the norm. Over the many decades that I have been active in Women’s Issues and Concerns, I have come to appreciate that Feminist issues are in fact Humanist issues. We together can make this world better for so many.”
We can’t wait to see images just like these ones.
Do you have a story for Mamamia? Email us news@mamamia.com.au.
Top Comments
Why are we STILL trying to prove what the 'perfect' body looks like or doesn't look like by comparing one woman with another? We will not find healthy body image in images of women alone - this is still asking us to compare ourselves with others.
We can however, build a loving relationship with our body through getting to know, and loving who we really are on the inside. Taking more care of ourselves, and deeply nurturing the woman we know ourselves to be. This then shapes everything (including our body).
Each woman's body is perfect for her when it is a reflection of who she truly is. When we can live a loving relationship with who we are - then, we can be the role models that we so need each other to be.
This is diversity?
Why does everyone have perfect teeth and complexions. Where are the dentally challenged with bad skin and alopecia? We could do this all day.