news

'We are so sorry we couldn't save you.' Charlie Gard's parents give up their legal fight.

Two weeks before what would be his first birthday, the parents of Charlie Gard in the UK have made the decision to end the legal battle to save his life.

Chris Gard and Connie Yates have been fighting for permission to let Charlie undergo treatment in the US, as the boy suffers a rare and fatal mitochondrial disease that leads to brain damage and immobility.

But the doctors treating Charlie in the UK labelled the US treatment “experimental” and said it would lead to further suffering if they were to transport Charlie between countries.

Though the couple took the case to the courts, and then to the European Court of Human Rights, their appeals were denied, with the Court of Human Rights declaring the case “inadmissable” at the end of last month.

Now, in a statement delivered to press outside the UK High Court, Chris Gard has said “too much time has been wasted” and that the latest MRI and EEG scans show Charlie’s illness has deteriorated “to the point of no return.”

“There is one simple reason why treatment cannot now go ahead: We are now in July and our poor boy has been left to lie in hospital for months without any treatment while lengthy court battles have been fought,” Chris Gard told reporters yesterday. “Had Charlie been given the treatment sooner he would have had the potential to be a normal healthy little boy.”

Charlie’s father went onto say that scans earlier in the year showed Charlie was in relatively good condition.

“Despite his condition in January, Charlie’s muscles were in pretty good shape and he was far from showing catastrophic irreversible structural brain damage. Charlie’s been left with his illness to deteriorate, devastatingly, to the point of no return.”

Charlie is thought to be one of just 16 children in the world with mitochondrial depletion syndrome.

Though he was born healthy, he showed signs of the disease at eight weeks and has been in the hospital, unable to breathe unassisted, ever since. According to their website Charlie’s Fight, his parents are campaigning not only to save his life but to improve the lives of others affected by the disease as well.

“If Charlie receives this treatment and it does work like the doctor in America thinks, it won’t be just Charlie’s life that has been saved, it will be many more children in the future who are born with this horrible disease,” the website reads. “It will open up other trials on other mitochondrial depletion syndromes.”

However, the European Court of Human Rights agreed with the British courts that the US treatment would expose Charlie “to continued pain, suffering and distress.”

Great Ormond Street Hospital released a statement outlining their “disappointment” that the US doctor who claimed last-minute he could give Charlie a chance of survival had not visited the hospital to examine Charlie, read his medical notes or viewed his brain scans.

The hospital added that De Michie Hirano had a “financial interest” in the drugs he was recommending.

Chris Gard said he and his wife would “have to live with ‘what ifs’ for the rest of their lives.

“Our son is an absolute warrior. His body heart and soul may soon be gone but his spirit will live on for eternity and it will make a difference to people’s lives for years to come. We will make sure of that,” he said.

The father went on to say they are preparing to turn off Charlie’s life support and asked the press for privacy—in what has been a very public case—during such a difficult time.

“We are now going to spend our last precious moments with our son Charlie, who unfortunately won’t make his first birthday in just under two weeks,” he said. “To Charlie, we say from Mummy and Daddy we love you so much. We always have and we always will and we are so sorry we couldn’t save you.”

What to do for a parent with a child in hospital.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Rebecca 7 years ago

Heartbreaking.


Anna 7 years ago

How heartbreaking for those parents. To have a 'potential' treatment to save their son taken away must be devastating. I don't think a court should be able to make that choice. Only a parent can. You can't tell me that with modern medicine Charlie could not have been kept comfortable to fly to the US. Now he will die anyway when he may have been saved and may have provided answers to a rare condition that could have saved others. What a shame. My heartfelt sympathy to his mum and dad.

SS 7 years ago

The real question is, why couldn't the doctor who promised them successful treatment make the trip to the UK to see Charlie in person and examine him or at the very least meet with doctors in the UK. The crowd funded money was sufficient to bring the Doctor over. The doctor was invited over and didn't come. You expected a hospital to send a sick boy on an international flight to have a treatment that is not proven to work? I completely empathesize with the parents here but the human rights court agreed with the hospitals decision.

Susie 7 years ago

The doctor who proposed this treatment never examined the child, his scans or test results. He had never used this 'proposed' treatment on a human before, nor had he received (or indeed) sought approval from the FDA to use it for Charlie Guard, plus the doctor had a financial stake in the company producing this 'miracle' cure. There is hope and then there is false hope. The baby was intubated and on 24/hr artificial respirstion, had multiple seizures etc. I doubt the doctors at GOSH would have applied for Guardianship on a whim, nor to spite the parents, but would have had done so for the baby's best interests.

TwinMamaManly 7 years ago

The baby was born with a catastrophic, terminal condition. I think the American doctor is unethical and immoral for giving this poor couple false hope when he hadn't even reviewed his file, let alone examined Charlie. The courts don't take these decisions lightly. And the 2 million pounds they raised, that would've last about a New Yrork minute in the US medical system, particularly for an infant dependent on life support, and you can guarantee once the money ran out, the Gards would've been abandoned and left with an enormous medical debt.

Guest 7 years ago

Saved him to live what sort of life, exactly? Parents are not always right, they are not doctors, and sadly, love makes them blind.