A private school for children with autism is being investigated after allegations a boy at the school was being held unsupervised in a lockable fenced structure he called a “cage”.
Officials from the NSW Board of Studies Teaching and Educational Standards body visited the ASPECT Macarthur School on Sydney’s western fringe and interviewed the parent of the child yesterday after 7.30 notified Minister Adrian Piccoli’s office of the complaint over the weekend.
The boy, Toby Jordan, now 13, has autism and a moderate intellectual disability and was sent to the lockable structure with a high fence, which the school referred to as the “top playground” when his behaviour escalated and he had “meltdowns” at school.
“The ‘top playground’, it’s not a playground,” Toby’s mother, Lynda Jordan told 7.30.
“It has an unused boarded up cubby house in it and the children themselves don’t call it the top playground – Toby called it the cage.”
‘They failed Toby’
Ms Jordan, who now does distance education with the boy, said she had no idea Toby was being sent to the “top playground” until she arrived at the school one day unannounced.
“I’d come down that road and heard that someone was screaming and pulled over to the side of the road and witnessed them bringing Toby out of the main playground gate,” she said.
“They had him slightly elevated from the ground and both had hold of his arms and his wrists, had them turned back.
“As they escorted him through a gate outside of the school, opened the gate to the lockable structure, pushed him in there, shut the lockable structure, turned around, and walked away.
“(Toby) was kicking, screaming, and fighting – he was hysterical.”
Toby saw his mother showing the photographs of the “top playground” to 7.30 and also volunteered that the teachers walked away from him after leaving him in there.
“I was trying to climb over there, (trying to get out). It’s hard to get out because see how high the fence is?” Toby said, pointing to the photograph.
When asked how it made him feel being in the top playground, he said he felt “sad” and he never wanted to go back to the school.
When Ms Jordan later applied through a solicitor for the school’s records, she said she discovered Toby had regularly been sent to the “top playground” when his behaviour was considered unmanageable.
But she said she had never approved this strategy and if she’d been asked, she would have said no.
She found a behaviour management plan, drawn up by the school, which did not bear her signature – she supplied this document and others to 7.30 showing regular use by some teachers of the “top playground”.
“It’s traumatic. He’s still traumatised,” a tearful Ms Jordan said.
“He trusted them… we sent him to school every day and said ‘the teachers know the right thing to do, listen to the teachers’, you know, we trusted them, we told him to trust them, and they weren’t trustworthy.
“They failed. They failed Toby.”
School carried out its own investigation
ASPECT’s national director Dr Trevor Clark disputed Ms Jordan’s version of events, saying she had agreed to the plan, that Toby Jordan had never been left alone, and the lockable structure was simply a playground that was still in use.
“No teacher leaves a child with autism unsupervised no matter what situation within a school or within a community and the reason for that is we have got a duty of care to our children – it was exercised at the time, it is very unfortunate that there was a different view about where staff were,” Dr Clark told 7.30.
When asked who told him Toby Jordan was not unsupervised, he replied “that’s what the investigation showed”.
But he conceded the investigation was conducted by the principal of the school, under the direction of his senior manager in education.
When asked if he was saying whether Ms Jordan or her son was lying, he replied that he was “not saying that”.
“It was a thorough examination and interview of all of the staff involved in terms of what happened, and that wasn’t the result,” he said.
‘When you get case after case … we need to have any inquiry’
Greens, cross benchers and the NSW Opposition are now looking at conducting an inquiry of their own.
Greens MP David Shoebridge and several of his crossbench colleagues recently met with 30 families and some teachers from across NSW with similar complaints.
“It was the same story being repeated time, after time, after time, after time, by parents and teachers,” he told 7.30.
“It was a story sometimes of quite severe physical abuse – some pretty extraordinary stories of children being restrained, being put in structures that looked to all the world to be a jail cell in a school.
“Children coming home bruised, and then when the parents make a complaint, the parent becomes victimised by the system.
“When it’s one case, you can turn a blind eye to it as an MP, but when you get case after case after case, well that’s when I think we need to move to have an inquiry.”
University of Newcastle education lecturer David Roy, who trains teachers and was a school teacher himself, was one of those parents and he has passed on to 7.30 complaints from other families who have moved to home-schooling or even moved interstate.
He said teacher training for managing children with disabilities, particularly autism, was woeful and children were accordingly missing out on getting an education.
“What scares me are the most vulnerable, the ones that can’t speak up for themselves, are the ones under the most danger and they are being abused,” Mr Roy said.
His son complained of being locked in a cupboard at his school, a public early intervention unit for children aged between three and five, and he also came home with bruising which Mr Roy and his wife Carly Dock thought looked like finger marks.
The NSW Education Department said in a statement it was investigating the complaint and NSW Education Minister Adrian Piccoli declined an interview, but sent a statement to 7.30.
“Any allegation of a child being mistreated at school is treated seriously, complainants must be treated with respect, and allegations must be investigated promptly by the appropriate schooling authority.
“In accordance with the mandatory reporting guidelines, where any alleged conduct involves risk of significant harm to a child, the matter must be reported to Family and Community Services (FACS) and the NSW police.
“New allegations provided by 7.30 have been referred to the Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards and the Association of Independent Schools. I have instructed these agencies to investigate the matters raised.”
This post originally appeared on ABC News.
© 2016 Australian Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved. Read the ABC Disclaimer here.
Top Comments
We don't need yet another inquiry, what we need to do is realize that some special needs children, at times, become violent towards others, that they become a serious risk to others and sometimes themselves, once we understand these reports of "case after case after case" while not ideal are in fact not the problem but a reaction to it, perhaps we can form a national strategy for these situations.
Clearly there is a problem accommodating a minority of special needs children in the education system, but is there a better solution?, is there a one size fits all solution? or would it be safer for all concerned if those children who pose a risk to others are simply excluded from attending school?.
1. It is not acceptable for students to be assaulted by another student
2. It is not acceptable for staff to be assaulted by students
3. It is not acceptable for staff to assault students..... Except when preventing 1. and 2.
Thank you. A rational response. One of my children had an aggressive violent child in their class in primary school. A mainstream local school. The teacher did her absolute best to protect the other students in her class and care for the special needs child but there is only so much one teacher can do when chairs are being thrown at a classroom full of 7 year olds. The rights of this seemed to trump the rights of the other kids. The kids were taught that if this child was in a bad mood they had to hide under their desks or run outside to avoid being hurt.
How this is acceptable in a classroom is beyond me when, if this was to happen in our home it would be considered domestic violence.