news

Australia’s oldest mum has given birth aged 63, but IVF experts have called her “irresponsible.”

On Monday at a private hospital in Melbourne a 63-year-old woman entered the maternity ward.

Accompanied by her 78-year-old husband the woman wasn’t a proud grandmother visiting her first grandchild, nor an excited aunt ready to celebrate a new birth.

This woman was giving birth and as she did the woman made history.

A 63-year-old woman gave birth to a daughter. Via IStock

As she underwent a caesarean section at 34 weeks pregnant to give birth to her first child the woman officially became oldest mother in Australia. At the age of 63 the woman gave birth to a daughter and ignited, once again, the debate over older mothers and what the cut off age for IVF treatment should be in Australia.

Seven News reported that the woman, a Tasmanian, gave birth at Frances Perry House private hospital in Parkville on August 1 supported by her 78-year-old partner.

‘I’m going to have a baby with my sister, and we couldn’t be more excited.’

The couple is reported to have conceived their daughter through IVF overseas, using a donor embryo after several failed in-vitro fertilisation attempts.

The mother and baby are reported to be doing well and will remain at Frances Perry House until she and her daughter are strong enough to head home to Tasmania.

The woman is Australia’s oldest woman to give birth, she beats the previous record by three years held by a Gold Coast woman who gave birth in 2010 at the age of 60.

The unnamed couple are from Tasmania. Image via Seven News.

But far from celebrating the medical advances that make such births possible IVF experts have criticised the use of a procedure in a woman of her age saying it is “irresponsible.”

Monash University professor Gab Kovacs told The Mercury that responsible IVF clinics refused treatments of women over the age of 53, saying that is the “end of natural pregnancy.”

“That child will need looking after for 20 years, and there’s a possibility she won’t be able to do that."

“Our bodies weren’t ­designed to have children in our 60s. I don’t think any responsible IVF unit in Australia would treat someone of that age, and it’s not a standard of medicine I would condone.”

 

“Our bodies weren’t ­designed to have children in our 60s." Image via IStock.

Data from studies carried out by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare reveals that the average age of women receiving treatment using their own eggs or embryos, is 36 years, and the average age for women using donated eggs or embryos is 40.8 years.

Unlike other OECD nations, Australia has no age limit on public subsidies for fertility treatment - though some hospitals and private centres impose their own cut off.

In Australia, the number of women over 40 having fertility treatment has almost tripled in the last decade. But only one in 100 women over 44 will deliver a live baby.

A recent investigation by Four Corners found that last year fertility treatment cost Medicare more than $250 million.

Earlier this year the debate about what age women should stop using IVF treatments was sparked when an Indian woman, at the age of 72 gave birth.

Dalwinder Kaur and her husband Mohinder Singh Gill had a healthy baby boy making her the world's oldest mother to give birth, according to The Times of India newspaper.

They said at the time their life now “feels complete” dismissing the controversy over their age.

Britain’s oldest mother, Sue Tollefsen, Via Facebook.

But Britain’s oldest mother, Sue Tollefsen, who gave birth to her daughter when she was 57, has faced up to the critics who say its irresponsible saying she often has regrets over having her daughter so late in life.

She told This Morning,  “I don't regret having her but I do regret not having her when I was younger. “

“The journey I have taken with her over the last seven years has been fantastic but what saddens me sometimes is when I look at her and look at myself I wonder how much time I have left with her.

“I'm hoping I can make 80 when she'll be 22.”

Ms Tollefson has called for an age limit of 50 years for women seeking infertility treatment.

Here in Australia Dr Kovacs agrees  “I think getting people of that age pregnant is irresponsible.”

 

Older mums in Australia:

  • In 2010 a 60-year-old woman who gave birth after falling pregnant through a donor embryo.
  • In 2011 a Gold Cost woman had her first child at the age of 50  a naturally conceived child.
  • In 2010, a woman gave birth to twins, conceived via IVF, in Perth at the age of 57.
  • In 2007, a 56-year-old Queensland woman gave birth to an IVF-conceived child.

 

 

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

Neesa 8 years ago

I had a scan when I was 34 and the technician made a point of scalding me for not having an amnio test, she said as "an older mother" I was irresponsible. At 34 I was considered old.


Guest5 8 years ago

Curious how all this concern for the baby sits alongside a bedrock feminist article of faith that abortion should be on demand.

What happened to, "my body, my choice" here? That seems to have disappeared real quickly. I doubt this couple decided to do this on a whim or for a bed. Good on them.

The age isn't ideal, but neither is 40 or 30, ideal is 20 or thereabouts. But again, the rivers run in reverse if you suggest women should be responsible and have babies right out of school. No, that's an intolerable suggestion.

There are grandparents raising young children due to the death, incarceration, incapacity or other unfortunate circumstances. If willing courts will and should place children in the care of relatives first.

Let them be, let them raise a family.

Modern Woman 8 years ago

Complex issues require brain capacity.

guest 8 years ago

'The age isn't ideal, but neither is 40 or 30..'

That is absurd. A post menopausal body vs an ovulating body. Yes indeed 'my body, my choice' for the wealthy where ethical issues don't rate a thought.

Did you see what happened to the 'oldest woman in the world' who had twin boys by IVF at age 66:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/...

http://www.independent.co.u...

guest 8 years ago

Have you given any thought the 'rights' of the child?