I’m sure Vivienne Westwood sleeps at night but I’m still sure this is a terrible campaign.
Vivienne Westwood has been working with Ethical Fashion of Kenya, which is, I suppose, better than not working with Ethical Fashion of Kenya.
She has made bags with locals and some of the profits from those bags will find their way to “improve livelihoods and empowering people in rural areas.” (Round of applause for the lady in the expensive clothes parading on the rubbish dump please.)
So far so Bono, I suppose. And I guess, that if this collection is to be a success it should be promoted. So, what better than to have Juergen Teller shoot Viv in every African poverty porn cliche? (I’m sure I coud find a picture of her surrounded by merry / grateful little African orphans, if I looked hard enough.)
Here’s a classic image: How chic, on a rubbish dump in a slum because …that’s Africa, don’t you know. Just waiting for European designers to swoop down and empower and improve it. (Deep breath) Maybe her bags have made a massive contribution to the wellbeing of the people in front of whose humble homes she posed and gurned? I am not sure or convinced.
Am I graceless, missing the bigger picture, overly sensitive? I know Kenya. I’ve worked there. It seems to me that as a country, it has many real talents who are more than capable of making a decent noise for themselves on a global platform, if they were to given the courtesy of being showcased in a dignified manner. I wonder how much more effective showcasing viable local enterprises for e.g, that could flourish with some assistance, could be? I suspect there are more people who would consider investing substantive amounts of energy and belief in watering a seed that looks viable, rather than pathetic and tragic. I don’t think there’s much dignified or empowering about reinforcing stereotypes of a poverty-stricken, rubbish-strewn Africa, being temporarily “helped out of the mire” by the grace and favour of a visiting monarch. In fact, by using images such as these, I believe she’s reinforcing every prejudice that exists about the African continent. And until perceptions change, nothing changes.
Of course I could be wrong.
Is it good enough that Vivienne Westwood has given work and money to so many Kenyan’s through the manufacture of her collection? Should the reputation of the country even be a consideration?
Vanessa Raphaely is Editor of South African Cosmopolitan and Editorial Director of Associated Magazines, publishers of Marie Claire, O, The Oprah Magazine and House and Leisure.







Comments
53 Comments so far
I agree with the writer. But it’s a bigger issue than just this picture or this campaign (it always is isn’t it!). I think what’s distasteful about this is that it perpetuates the idea that we rich country people have of Africa, that it is all misery and poverty, that there is no joy, no achievements, no advancements there. This feeds into the notion that rich countries and particularly rich people/ celebs should go there are save the African people.
There are some great African campaigners working on changing these perceptions. One of my fave’s is Mariéme Jamme (@mjamme).
She is also one of a group of campaigners who are anti aid to Africa.
The Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo (@dambisamoyo) wrote the book Dead Aid on this topic a couple of years back.
May be worth a follow if you’re interested. Cheers
loading...
I understand what your saying, but would anyone other than those already aware or involved taken any notice had the campaign not have been shot like this?
The harsh contrasts, and the imagery, is that which will (however stomach turning) make her consumers respond, notice and perhaps care.
She could have easily not done this project at all – with a benefit to no one in the Kenyan communities. Perhaps the pro outweighs the con in this case.
loading...
i feel really uncomfortable looking at those pictures! i believe that her ‘heart is in the right place’ but i can’t help but think those pictures are tacky and insensitive. it just doesn’t sit right with me. at all.
but, if this puts the spotlight on the horrible issues in these countries, and something good comes out of it, then i guess that is a good thing. right?
loading...
I believe any form of charity or good is tainted by a public display of its, and in turn its propagator’s virtues.
loading...
I question what makes Vanessa Raphaely think that her morals are greater than Vivienne Westwood’s.
This is an issue that comes up time and time again. Celebrities. Aid. The popular opinion seems to be that never the twain shall meet. And every time I have the same reaction. Why?? Why are we so quick to judge celebrities?
How is the Westwood campaign any different to other aid/development campaigns? Seriously. Think about it. This blog was also posted on the website of the Global Poverty Project. Does GPPs 1.4 Billion Reasons presentation not rest on the principle of Western people helping Africans, Indians, Bangladeshis, South Americans? Does the presentation not contain images and descriptions that fall squarely into the poverty porn category? Is the GPP not also trying to sell a product to a global consumer, just as Ms. Westwood is?
The same can be said for all genuine aid agencies, from World Vision or Plan, right up to UNICEF and other UN agencies. To “fix” the problems of poverty requires money. To get money, you have to sell a product. Would donors open their wallets if they were shown pictures of happy, well-fed, healthy kids? No. That much is simple. You can’t have it both ways, Ms. Raphaely.
I dare say that the celebrities you are all so quick to berate, from Bono to Bob Geldof, George Clooney, Angelina Jolie and everyone in between, have done far more to raise awareness and funds than groups such as the GPP and the Oaktree Foundation (who, as far as I can tell, are a bunch of kids skipping about the countryside spreading the word of poverty and then giving themselves a big pat on the back for “doing something”).
If you’re rich and/or famous and do nothing, you’re self-centred and don’t care about those living in poverty. Try to help, and you’re doing it for publicity and nothing more. Celebrities, it seems, are dammed if they do and dammed if they don’t.
I work in international development. I’ve volunteered and been employed both in Australia and overseas for a number of years now. I don’t have the answer for ending poverty, and neither does anyone else. If they did, I would be unemployed and we wouldn’t be having this discussion.
The truth is simple. It’s time we got off our collective moral high horse and stopped assuming that celebrities are somehow damaging our “noble” profession. Just because you’re not famous, doesn’t mean your attempts to help are somehow more moral than anyone else’s.
loading...
The difference is, Westwood will continue to profit from these photos for many years while the people are long forgotten. If you want to help these people and empower them, educate them, build them schools, libraries & hospitals, provide clean water and medicine.
Woopty-doo, she made a few handbags with the locals & ‘some’ of the profit will (eventaully) make its way to Kenya. Whats wrong with sending all the profit, I’m sure it wouldnt dent her bank balance too much.
These people have been exploited, thats what makes Vanessa’s morals better. Did you look at those photos, and see how the women were posing. I’m sorry but I dont really think they realised the enormity of what they were doing.
I also question whether those women were paid accordingly as to what Westwood would pay her models in the Western world
loading...
Thanks, Vanessa, for speaking publicly against yet another celebrity saviour’s use of poverty porn. I just completed my Master’s thesis on the ethics of images like this, and in the pilot study I conducted the people I interviewed were less motivated to donate by conventional “victim” images than they were by images showing aid recipients’ capacity to help themselves. And as the comments here from people of African descent remind us, victim images perpetuate racist and colonialist stereotypes.
So what do images like Westwood’s achieve? Yes, one-off donations and “some of the profits from those bags” might help keep people alive, but the long-term consequence of the use of poverty porn is the undermining of poverty eradication. Simplified representations promote simplified solutions. Images that say “you can save a life by buying a designer handbag” do nothing to foster understanding and critical analysis of Western complicity in world economic and political systems that keep parts of the world in poverty while the rest of the world benefits. Surely people are intelligent enough to handle this more complex reality.
Lisa Ferguson,
Toronto, Canada
loading...
god damn thank you for this vanessa.
loading...
Is it in bad taste? Yes.
Is it insensitive and degrading? Yes.
But will it achieve something? Yes.
It might not be the *right* thing, but at least it’s something.
People with too much money like being able to buy their way out of feeling guilty about it. Poverty porn is about turning conscience into an easily purchased commodity. Vivienne Westwood is using these images because of how they satirize the total disconnect between luxury fashion goods and poverty – funnily enough, she is actually making fun of her own customers in this way.
Yes, people should see African nations (or any nation that is the target of charity campaigns) for their strengths, beauties and unique features. But people don’t want to buy an image of Kenya looking beautiful. That isn’t what sells handbags for charity – people want to be able to see problems and imagine they are somehow fixing them by doing something they do anyway, buying a handbag. Another commenter mentioned Ab Fab, and it’s spot on.
It’s not great. It’s not a great solution. But at least it’s something. And until someone comes up with a better idea…. what’s the problem if rich people buy overpriced handbags and some of the proceeds end up in the pockets of people who need it more than Vivienne Westwood? We can’t expect her to be the singular answer to all the world’s problems – but however misguided or insensitive this is, she’s doing a hell of a lot more than most people.
loading...
I agrre with point of view of Joahnna above just dont understand why such handbag is selling so expensive with basic silks prints..and how is shared those amount of money in the end
loading...
Revolting. Stupid woman.
loading...
Have a look at this website – http://waterwellness.ca/perspectives-of-poverty/
This guy did a photo project in Africa taking 2 photos of the same people, one in poverty, one with dignity to try and demonstrate and reduce bias. It’s so true that you can photograph someone (or somewhere) from one angle and see it one way, but look a little differently and you can see the exact opposite. The photos he took are lovely and strong and thought provoking.
loading...
Wow, thank you for sharing this link, it’s wonderful!
loading...
I felt that those photographs were insensitive and very stereotypical. I do love to see people drawing attention to and pouring support into third world countries and for people who are homeless, without food or employment or health care and education. This is more of an advertisement for herself though. I really like what Oxfam does where they sell products that are made in Africa and the majority, if not all, of the profit goes back into the community. I don’t doubt Vivienne Westwood has donated an amount of money towards this project but any support for a third world country needs to be sustainable and needs to equip people with materials and skills necessary to continue to produce and make profits for the long term- and she would have had the capacity to contribute to a project that achieves that. This is one of the reasons why I dislike the photos of her smiling with the slums in the backdrop. She may have been trying to show that things could change or that something good could come out of the dire situation that these people are living in but her project does not scratch the surface of trying to change for the long term. It could encourage others to take up that role, but still. Perhaps I haven’t read enough about her project but I can’t see evidence of sustainability. That said, I do agree that it’s important that she has tried to do something to help and even a one-off donation will help some of the community in Kenya. Sorry if i’ve repeated anything from other comments- I haven’t read them yet.
loading...
Isn’t this just another advertising campaign to get people to buy ridiculously expensive things they really don’t need? The entire thing smacks of exploitation to me.
loading...
Have we forgotten Ab Fab already? High satire comes back as real life?
These images are pretty unbelievable. And like the Angelina in the jungles ones, they are all about the rich, white, Western identity. They make no sense with that cut out. So self-congratulatory.
Where have these images been presented?
loading...
This photo reminds me of the opening scenes of “Get him to the greek” with Russell Brand(?). A hilarious film!!
loading...
I’m a big Westwood fan, even travelled to Canberra to see her retrospective a few years back, but I find these photos pretty offensive and tasteless and I’m disappointed in her.
loading...
Westwood’s fault is not so much doing something and ‘helping’ these women ‘empower’ themselves. The fault, in my humble opinion, leading anyone who has any kind of history/connection with Africa to CRINGE when they see these images, is the art direction of the shoot. Epic stylist fail.
I will go out on a limb here to say that using African squatter camps or rubbish sites as setting/backdrop for a fashion shoot (ANY fashion shoot, for ANY designer), is tasteless, tactless and unimaginitively lazy. Especially if you’re familiar with the dire circumstances of people living there.
Bottomline: heads up to VW for trying to help and do some good. Thumbs down to the poor creative execution/art direction failing to take context into consideration.
loading...
Tasteless it may be – but you know what? If it means a few women choose to buy these bags over another designer bag and a bit of money goes to a worthy cause, fantastic.
I do part-time work for a charity. The sad thing that opinion writers don’t seem to realise is that the minute you write a petty negative about a charitable operation, their donations go down. Donations are sensitive in the extreme. (I am NOT saying charities should never have anything negative written about them. If a charity is shonky, it should be exposed. I’m talking about the more petty things – subjective issues such as this, a matter of taste). How many people are now not going to buy these bags because a magazine writer said that Westwood was being tasteless? How much less in terms of cashflow to the people who need it will this represent? Do you think the people in Kenya who made those bags would prefer the money from their work, or to know that someone in South Africa/Australia deliberately didn’t buy it to preserve their dignity for them?
loading...
I think that the more pressing issue here is this Vanessa character’s appaling command of the Queen’s English (while we’re on the topic of monarchs)! Surely it’s a prerequisite for an editorial career to be able to place a comma and an apostrophe correctly?!
loading...
Also from Africa, also hate the pictures. Ewww. Poverty porn.
loading...
Just a question: are the models locals or did she fly them in from the UK?
loading...
What is with people writing “for e.g”?! It’s the same as saying “for for example”! Ahhhhhhh!
loading...
other favourites include atm machines and icu units!
loading...
Or AM in the morning and PM in the afternoon
loading...
PIN Number.The Bankwest phone banking asks you for your phone banking PIN number. I made a complaint about it. Does my head in.
loading...
Oh, how f*%$ing tasteless!
loading...
Oh that picture !
They already did Derilicte in “Zoolander”.
loading...
With much more style!
loading...
I have a lot of time for Vivienne Westwood, as I know in the 1970s she was a single mum living in a council flat and getting her electricity cut off because she couldn’t pay her bills. She was savvy enough to see punk coming and rebuild her career. She’s no fool.
This might be in poor taste, but she’s actually *doing something*. She’s getting press coverage, which will hopefully turn into sales which will hopefully help the Kenyan people. It will hopefully make other manufacturers realise there is a willing workforce available.
I’m not going to sit on my arse at home and criticise people who try and do something. Good on her for trying to tackle a big issue in a small way, and help out some people.
loading...
I think it’s ok to use some of the slum background, but a rubbish tip? People do live with dignity in different situations, because they don’t have much choice, but seeing their areas rubbish tip photographed for publicity, I bet even they were embarrassed- for a cheap publicity stunt.
Her expression in them makes me cringe…pretentious bitch is what comes to mind.
loading...
Hi Vanessa
Good piece! My cringe allert went off when I saw that picture too. It’s all a bit colonialist saviour meets poverty chic, isn’t it. I take your point that she is still probably doing more good than harm… But As you point out, trading in, and perpetuating class based/ race based stereotypes is always problemtic… http://i.imgur.com/34is7.jpg
I “upvote” this article…
loading...
It just seems really bad taste, the photography I mean.
loading...
I love Vivienne Westwood, I like the way she designs, thinks and changes they way we can think about clothes. Have you ever noticed that her clothes can really changed the percieved body shape? And not necessarily to a way that enhances the ‘fashionable shape’, but to make it more interesting…
I love the wedding dress that is in there… just beautiful.
However, some of those photos are not well framed and maybe that’s the ‘style’ but I am not a fan. Some are great – the girl with the blue corrugated iron behind her is really interesting, but otherwise I am left a bit flat by the photography.
I guess that doesn’t really answer the poverty question though. I think back to the whole Angelina in a boat in Cambodia saga. I did some work in Cambodia last year and they absolutely ADORE her. The press from Cambodia praised her, brought up all their photos of her again, especially with her son Maddox etc…
I don’t feel as strongly as the author. Vivianne is still a business women. Why not combine charity and profits? Plenty of other businesses do similar
loading...
I don’t understand why she has to model the clothes. Why does she put herself in the campaigns?
loading...
Ego ?
But…..ego is not a dirty word. Don’t you believe what you’ve seen or you’ve heard.
Ego !
loading...
“some of the profits” … ahem… Surely Ms Westwood could survive quite comfortably if she received none of the profits???
loading...
Yes, I thought the exact same thing when I read ‘some’ of the profits.
loading...
this kindof reminds me of “derelicte” from zoolander… except it’s not funny at all.
loading...
Ugh. Publicity stunts like this make me feel ill. I really detest when the ‘rich white’ person comes in to save the ‘poor black’ people. I have no answers on how she could have done this better, but I do know that it leaves a sour taste in my mouth.
loading...
I’m going to argue FOR Vivienne Westwood on this one…
(OMG, JJ is commenting on a fashion story!!)
While I agree with your point about reinforcing stereotypes, there’s nothing here that doesn’t make sense from Vivienne Westwood’s past work…she’s always been very anti-fashion…displaying her designs amongst impoverishment seems totally in line with her past work…it just happens to be in Africa this time…
I mean, here’s a classic shot taken in a grotty industrial back lane somewhere in England…
loading...
Just because she’s always done it doesn’t make it right though does it? There are real people involved in these shots. Real people that live a life of squalor and misery and while I admire that she gives them work and an income and enables them by providing them with real positive outcomes does she really have to shoot the images of her designs in their homes? It reeks of poverty porn. And it makes me feel really uneasy
loading...
Yep…she’s Vivienne Westwood…she does that…I’m not saying you’re wrong either…
Coming from Vivienne Westwood, I almost feel like she’s satirising poverty porn…yep, it’s a fine line and most people probably won’t understand that…
I guess, for me, growing up with all of Vivienne Westwood’s Punk iconography, her New Wave pirate chic etc etc, it doesn’t feel exploitative…but I’ll also accept it’s just me…
I don’t have many fashion icons, but she is one of mine…I will totally admit I’m biased on this one…when I look through a history of Vivienne Westwood’s work, you see my personal history…just as much as Rick’s 90′s music tastes…
loading...
I have to disagree, poverty is very real and it is very present in Africa, and yes I have spent a lot of time there, living and working. Regardless of her motivation or method, she is bringing attention to this very real issue and hopefully motivate others to help.
loading...
It’s funny because I come from South Africa and Vanessa who writes this lives in South Africa and I find it as distasteful as she does…maybe it’s an African roots thing and seeing how much more there is one can do. I think she is bringing attention to her label and herself, not to the people of Kenya
loading...
I think its because those of us with African roots have seen the desperate reality of life for people in the shanty towns
It feels like a throw back to that condescending colonial mind-set of ‘lets help the poor desperate savages’
Its harsh, but I wonder if when they stopped for lunch, they let the locals observe and gave them the priviledge of their table scraps
loading...
So because they are poor and/or black, they don’t have an opinion and the ability to say yes or no? Have you considered that perhaps it’s not up to you to decide what’s ‘right’ for anyone other than yourself?
Perhaps VW is celebrating the lives lived amid the difficulties of these everyday realities. All you see is “squalor and misery”, but this is the life that people live…….and there is the possibility that they don’t want your judgement.
loading...
Poverty is not a choice, they do not have the luxury to say yes or no.
You can do good and treat people with respect
loading...
I don’t ‘get’ fashion. I doubt I ever will.
The thing that grates with these pics is the smile on Ms Westwood’s face. It just seems so insincere.
loading...
ahem….who on EARTH would wear this shit…and who in Gods name decided she’s a good designer…what is she wearing?????????? Sorry – can’t like it…they don’t look very happy.
loading...
I looks to me that once the camera’s stopped ‘rolling’ that smile would disappear and she would be ordering someone to bring her the disinfectant.
There doesn’t seem to be anything honest in those photographs, in my opinion.
loading...
Those images are horriblle. I don’t like any of them.
Kinda looks like she’s come in to have a party and take some happy snaps but has forgotten that she’s surrounded by the reality of life for many of Africa’s population.
loading...