Do You Like This Story?
art 353 savita 300x0 290x385 News: This woman died in hospital for reasons that will astound you.

31 year old Savita

Savita Halappanavar was 17 weeks pregnant when she was admitted to an Irish hospital on October 21st, complaining of back pain.

One week later she was dead.

When she arrived at the hospital, doctors told 31-year-old Savita that she she appeared to be losing her baby. Savita then asked if she could have the pregnancy induced if it was going to be impossible to save the baby regardless. She asked if she could access a medical termination. To save her life.

And the doctors refused.

Savita was informed by the doctors that they were legally unable to perform the termination because the foetus still had a heartbeat. “This is a Catholic country,” they told her.

Savita soon became critically ill and was transferred to the intensive care unit where she later died of septicemia (blood poisoning triggered by infection).

Her husband told the media: “Savita was really in agony…She was very upset but she accepted she was losing the baby. When the consultant came on the ward rounds on Monday morning Savita asked if they could not save the baby could they induce to end the pregnancy. The consultant said ‘As long as there is a foetal heartbeat we can’t do anything’.”

An unnecessary death like this, is the kind of story you’d never expect to hear out of a developed country like Ireland. But abortion remains a fiercely contested issue in Ireland. While other aspects of life in the country have become increasingly secularised, legislation surrounding abortion remains strongly coloured by the country’s Catholic heritage.

a ABORTION PROTEST 640x468 380x277 News: This woman died in hospital for reasons that will astound you.

Protests following the Savita’s death

The Constitution of Ireland states that the unborn have an explicit right to life from the time of conception.

Since 1992, women seeking an abortion within Ireland have been given the ‘right to travel’, which usually involves women leaving their families to travel to the closest major English city, Liverpool, where abortion is legal.

An estimated 4000 Irish women travel to England every year to access abortion services.

Galway, which is in Ireland’s west and is where Savita Halappanavar was from – is 400km from Liverpool.

Ireland is currently under pressure from the European Court of Human Rights to reconsider their stance on abortion. The EU member state was given the direction in 2010, but legislative change is yet to occur.

A mass protest of over 2000 people was held outside Ireland’s parliament, the Dail, yesterday in response to Savita Halappanavar’s death calling for a reform of Ireland’s abortion laws.

This from the Sydney Morning Herald:

Many distressed protesters outside the Dail held candles in her memory, and there were emotional scenes as speakers condemned the government for having earlier rejected abortion-law reforms tabled by United Left Alliance MP Clare Daly.

tumblr mdhce0zmUU1r74sv2o1 400 380x162 News: This woman died in hospital for reasons that will astound you.“Had that legislation been in place, Savita’s life would have been saved because doctors at University Hospital in Galway would have had a very clear understanding of legal guidelines,” Choice spokeswoman Stephanie Lord later told Fairfax Media.

“People are very angry and upset that this woman had to die before anyone would take notice. There have been women who have been raped and suicidal or who have had horrendous medical conditions and now this young woman has died — why has it got to this stage?”

Recently, Northern Ireland opened its first abortion clinic. We ran a post from the clinic’s director here. It’s a start. However small. And hopefully developments like this clinic will mean fewer women die in the agony and distress that Savita did.

 

Comments

Comment Guidelines : Imagine you’re at a dinner party. Different opinions are welcome but keep it respectful or the host will show you the door. We have zero tolerance for any abuse of our writers, our editorial team or other commenters. So if you’re rude, mean-spirited, snarky, aggressive, defamatory or bitchy, your comment will be deleted (so will any replies to the original comment – so don’t bother arguing with rude people, instead just hit the ‘alert moderator’ button).
And if you’re offensive, you’ll be blacklisted and all your comments will go directly to spam. Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re going to be – cool. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation…

Use your profile to comment: Or, comment as a guest:
(Max file size is 150kb & jpeg's only - if you need help resizing go here »)

64 Comments so far

  1. positivelyhappy

    What these doctors did is deny this woman her human right: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person …. and…. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. (Taken from united nations declaration for human rights)
    They pretty much tortured this woman with pain and suffering and eventually denied her the right to live.
    Everyone is saying that it would be a hard this for the doctors to induce the pregnancy and inevitably end the life of the foetus but to me it would be much harder watching this woman die in agony knowing there is something that could be done to save her.
    It is a shame that fear of punishment came before right to life

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. Mez

    The Catholic Church is all about control and this is just another example – I thought their control was being replaced by good sense and judgement in such cases as Savita’s but clearly this is still not so in Ireland. Catholicism has screwed up so many lives in so many ways, for way too long. Tragically Savita and her baby are the latest altar offerings.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. Tanja Cilia

    This is terrible – the people in the hospital chose to ignore the Double Effect teaching of the Catholic Church. “Operations, treatments and medications that have as their direct purpose the cure of a proportionately serious pathological condition of a pregnant woman are permitted . . . even if they will result in the death of the unborn child.”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  4. Me

    I can hardly believe that expediting the death of a foetus – which was already in the process of “self-aborting” and with no hope of survival outside the womb – would be legally considered an abortion?!?!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  5. Craig

    “legally unable to perform the termination because the foetus still had a heartbeat”

    This is the real issue. Whether the doctor thought morally it was right or wrong, they can’t just perform any procedure if it is against the law. They will eventually be de-registered or worse (jail ??).

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Alice

      Which is why the article is calling for the laws to be changed – not for the doctors to have to go vigilante.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  6. Hmmm

    Just a thought…Ireland is a democracy so the law makers are voted in, presumably each party has a stance on this issue. The Irish people vote these politicians in. Where does the Catholic Church come into this? I understand that they have their stance but as far as I’m aware the politicians are the ones making the laws, not the Church. This isn’t a country run by religious leaders last time I looked.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Trish

      And whenever these politicians actually grow the balls required to have a referendum on legalising abortion, it will be passed by the people, but this depends on Irish politicians actually doing what’s right for a change, and I’d be surprised to see that in my lifetime.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Sarah

      But politicians who are democratically elected still bow to the pressures of religious lobby groups if they believe they can make trouble for the party getting back into power in future. It happens all the time in Australia – we have a two party system and both major parties are constantly bowing to the demands of the religious right. It doesn’t leave those of us who object with many options if both the parties who have the ability to form government are relenting to similar pressures.

      I’m not saying the religious right don’t have as much right to representation as anyone else, but very small, very vocal lobby groups in Australia have been able to force the government to maintain policies that go against what polls suggest the majority of voters actually want (in Aus, same sex marriage is the obvious example at the moment)

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  7. Kaniz

    this is totally confusing me. in west countries it should be legalise to have a baby abortion. how come she could`nt survive but at least one of them. this is a dreadful ancedotel article.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. Kaniz

    this is totally confusing becoz in west countries it is legalise to have a baby abortion and home come she could`nt survive. there wrere always been a ways

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  9. essessesse

    This story made me weep. Then I got angry. Then I wept again. I’m still angry.

    Most people here have covered this already but the miscarriage was inevitable. The os of the cervix was open, Savita was bleeding and the uterus was contracting. The logical course of action was to take her to theatre & remove the foetus. If she’d been an English hospital – just 400km away across the sea) that’s what would’ve happened. Instead, an infection entered her bloodstream and she suffered days of unnecessary pain and emotional suffering before dying. All of this because there was a foetal heartbeat. At 17 weeks the pregnancy would not have been viable. Still, I’m sure the doctor feels s/he has a clear conscience, what with them not removing the foetus and all that.

    There’s a link here to an Irish solicitors page, I got this as a tweet yesterday. The Irish Medical Council has a guide to professional conduct & ethics. Those doctors could have treated Savita differently.

    http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2012/11/14/the-medical-councils-guidance-on-abortion/

    I remember a conversation I had with a senior nurse when I was just starting my nursing career in the UK. We were talking about abortion & she was telling me about a patient she’d cared for just weeks before the Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1967 became law. It was an 18 year old girl who’d had a back street abortion & had died from septicaemia. “I never want to see a young girl die like that again,” she said.

    I’m still angry.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  10. Marijana

    I don’t quite understand this whole story! Why did this women die?(yes the infection I know, but still) If the unborn baby was about to die, why is it considered abortion to induce pregnancy? How come they put more priority on the unborn baby than saving the woman’s life?
    I am a medical professional yet don’t understand it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Cold

      There was a fetal heart beat.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Alice

        I don’t think it’s considered an abortion, but if the legislation gives the foetus a right to life then doctors probably can’t take any action they know will end or endanger the foetus’s life. Inducing pregnancy at 17 weeks would be doing just that. I don’t agree with it at all, but I believe that’s the reason.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • ANONOMOUS

        what about the mother’s heartbeat? does that not matter?

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  11. Alana

    The catholic church is the biggest hypocritical organization in the world. I was christened catholic & went to catholic schools (all forced on me like so many parents do). As an adult I am grossly against Catholicism. It’s disgusting & shameful & I’m proud to not be a catholic anymore.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  12. Mel

    I was brought up a Catholic and was practicing for most of my life. I was carrying a child that wasn’t going to survive (he had a condition which the medical community term “incompatible with life”) and I found that out at 32.5 weeks.

    My husband and I decided to induce the birth at 33.5 weeks because of my mental state. We had also hoped tht we would have a chance to hold our son whilst he was alive. Our aim wasn’t to end his life as we did choose not to terminate the pregnancy with a lethal injection but it was to end our suffering and try to commence healing. I even asked for a c-section to save to give him a chance of life outside of my body but was denied.

    My obstetrician and the hospital’s ethical committee agreed that given my history an induction of labour which was a termination of the pregnancy. I am grateful that I had the choice and that the hospital didn’t deny me my choice. I honestly don’t know what I would have done to myself if I hadn’t had the choice. Regardless of my decision, my son’s heart stopped before I was admitted to hospital so my heartbreaking decision was all for nought. I still live with the guilt of choosing to end my pregnancy (even if my decision didn’t actually end my son’s life).

    I feel terrible that women throughout the world are denied these choices. I feel for Savita, her baby and her family. I feel for the doctors who had no choice but to deny her a basic right.

    When I think about the way the Catholic church treated me after my son’s deeath with some priests insinuating that my son was in limbo because he had never been baptised but you can’t baptise a dead baby. I think why the hell does that institution have the right to tell anyone what to do? How dare they think that they can tell a woman what is right for her? Don’t even let me get started on the hypocrisy re: child sex abuse.

    May Savita and her child rest in peace. I hope that Ireland realises that there is no black and white in life and death, there are terribly harsh shades of grey that nobody should ever face but unfortunately we do.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Ems

      I am so sorry for what you had to go through xx

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  13. wemmyh

    One more thing to be thankful to the catholic church for!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  14. heather

    This will be only the tip of the iceberg. I wonder how many other women this has happened to, whose families did not complain. I also wonder how many women have had to endure days of agony losing an unviable pregnancy, as Savita did.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  15. Anonymous

    My fourteen year old daughter had her appendix out. About six days later we went on a family holiday and her wound was infected. For three days I drove to every hospital and doctor on the south coast with an ill child and not one of them would touch her. The wound was enormously inflamed and I was frantic.

    I ended up driving her hundreds of miles home to the doctor who performed the operation. It burst open on the way. For weeks we had to pack her open wound.

    I’m saying … Medical negligence happens here. It happens everywhere. We don’t know all the details yet.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • guest

      wow! Unbelievable

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  16. Anonymous

    I’m not a doctor. I’m pro choice but not pro abortion for anything other than medical or psychological imperative.

    I’m just saying … I’d find it very hard to end the life of a 17 week baby. I really would. Not saying it shouldn’t have been done but i’m saying stop and think for a minute before judging a human who is expected to do the unthinkable if it goes against their beliefs.

    Think of the realities and walk in their shoes before judging.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      Surely the Hippocratic oath of doing no harm should have been swayed in favour of the person asking for the procedure?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • amandarose

      I think it is a bit different when the mother is dying. Then they both die- doesn’t make much sense to me. I would feel worse about ending BOTH their lives.
      I do agree you can”t make DR’s give abortions no one should be made to do that but this crosses the lines into negligence.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • sophie

        they had assessed that the baby would die regardless. Would aborting to end it more quickly not have been compassionate?

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Artefact

      The thing is Anonymous, you are not really ‘pro-choice’ if you are eliminating the choices of others unless they fit into your particular (perhaps even arbitrary) categories of ‘medical and psychological imperatives’. Pro-choice means supporting the choices of others regardless of our own beliefs. It means recognizing that other people make choices based on their own life experiences and their own judgement and even if we would choose something different for ourselves we would not take away their ability to choose for themselves or the options available to them. It means supporting people in educating themselves and having informed consent in choosing what they do with their lives and their bodies.

      Doctors *must* be pro-choice in the full sense of the word. Yes, we find it hard to do the things that we need to do sometimes. Ending the life of a 17 week old baby is not the hardest thing that we have to do, there are much harder things. We witness suffering every day – I work in an area of critical care medicine and we often have to make very difficult decisions with and for our patients. If, as a medical student or a junior doctor, you discover that you cannot do the ‘unthinkable’ then you should not be practising medicine. Our personal (religious or moral) beliefs extend as far as our own bodies, not beyond that to the bodies and lives of others. All doctors should practise medicine ethically in this way and I do not accept the excuse that we have the right to turn away when a particular procedure ‘goes against our beliefs’.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous

        Very well said Arefact, pro choice is pro CHOICE, it’s not pro ‘my choices’.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
      • Amandarose

        Everyone has a line and we have to follow the law. If euthanasia was legal would you feel comfortable with it? It is a controversial area and I bet many would not be comfortable with the concept. Would you perform female circumcision? What about unnecessary procedures that affect someone health? gastric banding for anorexics etc.
        people of every society have a moral code they follow and you don’t drop that when you become a Dr.

        In this case common sense was clearly missing and I feel negligent and harmful and the out come was two deaths instead of one.

        But the general principle that health professionals especially Dr’s need to be prepared to do the unthinkable is ridiculous.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Artefact

          Amandarose, I see the point that you are trying to make. There are certain procedures in medicine that I disagree with or that I would never choose for or do to myself. There are some decisions that make me uncomfortable and there are certainly many areas of grey in the area that I work. In my reply to Anonymous I kept the word unthinkable in quotation marks because different things are ‘unthinkable’ to different people based on their morals. Morally I disagree with aesthetic surgery and would never work in that particular specialty. But I do still believe in un-coerced informed consent and would not deny anyone access to any medical treatment that is legally permitted in the country and area that I practise even if I question the level of social coercion that exists for cosmetic procedures, including female circumcision that is sanctioned by religious extremist groups and encouraged and accepted by some social groups.

          All professionals work within a legal and ethical framework. What my comment was attempting to address was that doctors learn in training what they are expected to do and what is legally permitted as well as legally enforced where they train and where they will one day prepare to work. I do not believe in defending the actions of the doctors involved in Savita’s case because what they had to do was ‘unthinkable’. If legal grey areas are putting doctors in the position of being unable to offer appropriate medical treatment to patients who need it then this must be addressed. But we can’t choose not to do things simply because we morally disagree with them. If, as doctors, we have deep moral conflicts then we should not be practising medicine or we should be confining our practice to areas where we will not encounter those types of decisions and responsibilities. We have a duty of care to each of our patients to practice medicine to the best of our abilities and that goes beyond our personal choices.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • Kris2040

      It wasn’t a 17 week old baby. It was a foetus. That was threatening it’s mother’s life because something went wrong.
      She asked for an induction and then a D&C, and both were refused. Her life that is happening already was taken. Why does the right of the foetus trump the right of the already living? If she asked for an induction that is hardly a request for an abortion because she doesn’t want to go ahead with the pregnancy. Does that fit into your “pro-choice” rules??

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Lin

        I agree with you completely..it is not a abortion…should have been assisted miscarriage. When I was nursing all foetus’s under 24 weeks were not thought to be viable….A complete loss of life for no reason.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
    • Bored of Burwood

      The cervix was open. The pregnancy could not be saved. The body was trying to get rid of the pregnancy. If the cervix is open infection gets in, moves round the body in the bloodstream. It’s how women used to die in the olden days.

      The doctors could have helped & they didn’t. They weren’t ending the life because the pregnancy was beyond saving. Savita wasn’t, though.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  17. sipper

    Ireland has been dominated by the Catholic church for many decades and its law on abortion is directly due to this. Again a reason for Catholics to stand up in Australia given the current revelations here and actively demand change. Stop going to Mass, stop paying Catholic school fees, Stop using Catholic hospitals. If you want change only action will make it happen.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Jenny

      I hear ya! I sometimes wonder if I’m the only person in my circle that has access to newspapers, Internet and tv, otherwise how can all my catholic friends still be sending their kids to catholic schools etc?

      I certainly can’t do it.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  18. KatieK

    It’s a Catholic country. If you don’t like it, don’t live there.

    Is an Islamic country expected to change their laws to suit our beliefs?

    Anyway, this is a medical negligence case rather than opportunity to bash the tikes. I’m not even Catholic and I can see it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • You're joking

      So by that logic (medical negligence), the fact that she ‘chose to live (in a Catholic country)’ is completely irrelevant.

      What an unfeeling and hurtful sentiment. More fool her for getting pregnant in the first place, amirite??

      FFS.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • sipper

      You have got to be joking.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Jenny

      In fairness as an Irish woman even I am stunned that this happened. Really a and truly I can’t believe it. I never would have thought that in a million years that if I was to have my children at home in Ireland that this could happen to me. So how could Savita have known that?

      As far as I was aware if a woman’s life was in danger she would be given a termination, I’m sure it was written into the law after the XCase in 1991 but I don’t know anymore. Savita can’t be the only woman in Ireland to have this happen to her, other woman must have been given d & c, otherwise there would be other cases of women dying. I know when my amniotic fluid started to leak at the end of my pregnancy here my dr was super worried about infection and wanted to induce me ASAP so I’m sure it happens often. Why the consult was not worried about infection for her I don’t know , I wonder if she came up against a staunchly catholic consultant who was being a prick? I think he/she will be up for medical negligence as well as the hospital but the investigation will reveal more I hope.

      And yes I bloody well would expect Ireland to legalise abortion to suit me and other women thanks.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Lulu

        Jenny, there was a piece called “Damned if they do” in the Fairfax press a couple of weeks ago, about how even in circumstances where an abortion would be legal in Ireland, women are often not told this & are not advised where they can go. I won’t post the link because it will probably hit the smap filter, but if you Google ‘damed if they do’, it’s about the second one to come up.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Jenny

          Yes I read it. That shocked me too. I really thought you could have a termination if the baby was not going to live or if the mothers life was in danger. it seems the whole area is so grey that dr’s and others are afraid to do anything but still if a woman is at risk of dying I’d have thought a d&c would and could be performed. Otherwise there would be women dying in similar circumstances to Savita.

          It needs to be properly legislated as I’m beginning to find out this arvo, that although there was a change to the constitution years ago it was not properly legislated for ere go this grey area.

          Yes I have a steep learning curve this last few days. Also the EU have been asking Ireland since 2010 to clarify its stance on abortion too but they haven’t. I didn’t know that either. For me I always thought if I was living at home and I got pregnant and I wanted an abortion I would go to the UK. If I got pregnant and there was a problem my obst would do whatever to help me. Well I was wrong there.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
        • Neeks

          The “Damned If They Do” article.

          Everybody should read that. Everybody. It left me in tears.Thanks Lulu.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
    • Ros

      Ireland is not a Catholic country. It is a secular country. The Church just has far too much influence.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  19. mags

    This is NOT how pro-life religious dogma is supposed to work. If a mother’s life is at risk, surgery should be performed with the intent to save both but if the foetus/baby dies but the mother lives then that is tragic but the mother’s life is equally as important.
    In this instance, every measure should have been taken to save BOTH their lives, obviously the baby would have died (based off the news reports), but that wasn’t the “intention”.

    It’s sad that this case will be held up as a misrepresentation of pro-life beliefs…
    Well actually, it seems those pro-life doctor’s did have that belief. But that’s medical negligence and a wrong application of a right stance.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      If there’s surgery involved it would be wonderful if the foetus is saved too, but the mother’s life should come first.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  20. Elle

    This is a sad story and I am personally outraged that medical staff took the action they did.

    However, having worked in hospital for many years I understand (but do not condone) why an abortion was not performed. I know it is hard to see past the very sad outcome but there is so much bureaucratic red tape in hospital systems (in Australia and all over the world) that looming litigation would have made any doctor scared to step up and perform an abortion.

    It’s a rubbish system that mounting paperwork takes priority over a dying woman.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Cold

      Did you work in Irish hospitals?

      There’s no way that would happen here. No way.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  21. chillax

    That poor darling. I’m shocked and saddened by this. Such a dreadful waste of a wonderful woman’s life.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  22. Trish

    Thank you for running this story. I tweeted an article about this to Mamamia and Jamila last night when I read it in the hope that it would help get this story international coverage and maybe with global scrutiny, Irish law can finally move towards pulling itself out of the dark ages and start putting it’s citizens and residents first for a change.

    To say I am angry about this is an understatement. Angry and saddened for that poor woman and her family, and the other children that she can now never have because her life was taken away to protect the life of a child that had no chance of survival.

    Also, as an Irish person today, I am ashamed to be from a country that treats women this way.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  23. vanessayoung

    I can understand (but not condone) the doctors fear of terminating this pregnancy and of breaking the laws of Ireland. What I can not understand is why they did not see that septicemia was a possibility and take steps to prevent the occurrence of infection.
    The whole situation is tragic and sickening. The rights of women to have equality in medical care (i.e. all measures will be taken to save the life of an other wise healthy 31 year old person) surely trump the nervousness of a government “worried” over whether or not conservative voters will re elect them.
    If government does not clarify the rules of termination for doctors then the Irish Minister for Health ought to make his/her self responsible for decisions such as those that needed to be made in this case.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  24. Jade

    I can not believe this happened in Ireland – I have never been but didn’t realise they were so entrenched with religious dogma.

    I hope the doctors involved are stood down and legislation is passed so that no other woman has to die for such a trivial reason.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • hang on

      The doctors can’t be stood down, they legally upheld the law. Yes, it is atrocious and a woman lost her life. The rules must be changed to allow people like Savita to live! But they can’t technically lose their jobs if their decision was based on law and their hands were tied.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • ANONOMOUS

        WOAH….. so upholding the law is letting someone die when a life could have been saved?
        as mentioned below the eighth amendment of the constitution of Ireland states: Article 40.3.3 “The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right.”
        EQUAL RIGHT OF LIFE TO THE MOTHER!!!
        Im sorry but on what planet is that saying the the mother cannot be saved at the expense of the foetus which would not have survived anyway?
        In this day and this age that is utterly ridiculous, i dont think the family would have pursued the fact that the pregnancy was “terminated”
        Their actions basically killed a woman… i do not believe that that is the intention of the constitution or the catholic church… how sad some people do not have any real perspective.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  25. Ems

    I’ve just been reading this on the Daily Mail website and it made me sick to my stomach. It’s an absolute travesty that this woman was not saved when her life was clearly in danger and it had already been decided the pregnancy could not be saved. Those doctors should renounce their Hippocratic oath if this is how they think a person in their care should be treated. Wish all the best to the grieving husband, can’t imagine what he is going through right now.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  26. Anonymous

    This is a sad and despicable situation with a tragic end.

    She wasn’t some careless teenager (not that it would matter), she was a married woman who was going to lose the fetus anyway and the health professionals chose religious doctrine over her life.

    Shocking.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  27. Neeks

    I have been reading about this all morning. I feel feel so angry that this has happened.

    From what I have read elsewhere it appears Savita spent three days in agony, with her cervix dilated in what was an inevitable miscarriage of a 17 week old fetus. There is no possible way that the fetus would have survived and the standard and proper medical response is to evacuate the uterus. Her cervix was open for three friggin days! Her water had broken, the fetus was coming out one way or another and had zero chance of survival because at that stage of development it wouldn’t be able to breath because the lungs have not formed properly. So the “pro-life” answer to this situation is to let a woman and a fetus die. How the hell can anybody use the term pro-life when they do this?

    To add to this, Savita was a dentist (so she would have been knowledgable about the risk of sepsis) and had repeatedly asked for the pregnancy to be terminated once she knew it wasn’t viable. I am so angry and I feel so sorry for her and for her husband that now has a dead wife and child because of the gargabe-disaster-nightmare that is anti-abortion legislation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  28. Anonymous

    I feel so sorry for her husband. He has lost his wife and child due to an incompetent medical and legal system.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  29. Caryis

    I believe this to be more a case of medical negligence than Catholc doctrine and Irish laws. My SIL’s cousin was offered and encouraged to terminate her pregnancy at 19 weeks because her life was endangered by pre-eclampsia and a late term diagnosis of life-incompatible spina bifida in her baby. I’ll be interested to read the findings of the inquiry and trust that the doctor is held negligent.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      Article 40.3.3 “The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right.”

      There is actually no law that explicitly states that a woman is entitled to an abortion if it risks her health. It is a rather grey area.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
    • Anonymous

      You are correct Caryis. This is medical negligence and definitely not in keeping with Catholic doctrine. There is a significant difference between the deliberate and intentional ending of an unborn life, and the early delivery of the unborn, even when their death may be the result, in order to save the life of the mother. The Catholic church allows for the latter.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  30. Charlie

    “Savita had a heartbeat too” is the most powerful statement in this article

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  31. Bored of Burwood

    I am so angry about this. 21st century and a woman dies in a developed country from a miscarriage. It’s obscene. I hope there is a full and transparent enquiry and the person/s responsible are brought to account.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  32. savannahofaus

    Dreadful. I simply cannot understand how the mothers life means nothing in this kind of situation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...