Flipping through trade journal AdNews recently, my eye was caught by the following headline: It’s a Mamamia Election. Underneath was a column written by the most powerful man in the advertising industry Harold Mitchell on the way social network users are changing the way politicians interact with voters and how political parties can’t afford to ignore the online world.
In particular, he mentioned Mamamia and how you all are going to be hugely influential come election time. Did you hear that? More about you in a moment.
Keep reading even though this is about politics. I promise it’s interesting.
Harold Mitchell is the executive chairman at Mitchell Communication Group and he noted that in the recent UK election, political parties have their ad budgets capped at $29m per party (WHAT A GREAT IDEA THAT IS). And – wait for it – the conservatives (our version of Liberal) spend half of that, Labour only half and the Liberal Democrats almost nothing. Instead, much of the capmpaigning activity was directed towards digital media, notably social media.
Of the UK election, Harold Mitchell writes….
“ In the UK, one of the biggest social networking arenas for this group is the online forum this election was called the Mumsnet election. Mumsnet has 1.5 million monthly unique users. All major political spokespeople took the opportunity to participate in live web chats with the Mumsnet audience including the three main leaders, other minor parties, as well as shadow and serving ministers.
The Mums net live web chats are known to be gruelling affairs. They are unmoderated and unstructured. Importantly, the speaking politician does not get to set the agenda. Rhetoric and hyperbole just don’t cut it on Mumsnet. In one session, Labour leader Gordon Brown had to respond to nearly 40 questions – ranging across defence, education, health, swine flu, women in politics, parking fines, unemployment, breastfeeding, tax, climate change, banking and childcare policy; all in one session.
A glutton for punishment, Tory leader David Cameron fronted up for three sessions. He’s the PM now. Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg was eventually declared the Mumsnet favourite. He’s now deputy PM after seeing his party win its greatest share of votes in nearly 30 years.
The fact is, this kind of engagement is not optional. Voters demand it. They want to see their politicians candid and unrehearsed.
In Australia, we have the phenomenon of blogger Mia Freedman – a former magazine editor and mother of three – whose Mama Mia blog attracts nearly 140, 000 users a month. What Freedman’s blog has in common with Mumsnet is that the content is not restricted to narrowly defined “mums” issues.
Her current blog included an analysis of the budget, and a disgruntled post on the subject of Labor dropping the ETS. Kevin Rudd, Tony Abbott and Bob Brown, need to pay attention to what goes on in these kind of forums – where real voters discuss the issues that matter most in their lives.
Deft use of social media makes a level playing field for all candidates, as long as they understand that sincerity is the only currency.”
Things are certainly hotting up and Australian politics is certainly getting interesting even if you don’t usually care.
With an election due to be called any time, a possible leadership challenge to the Prime Minister by the enormously popular Julia Gillard fueling the wet dreams of political journalists everywhere and an opposition leader who has FINALLY been persuaded to put his clothes back on (perhaps that’s just a winter thing), I find myself more and more drawn to the spectacle of it all.
Top Comments
What democratic societies should learn lessen from Australia election 2010:
1.What productive action has PM Julia Gillard in office 100 days?
When inflation is a looming threat, with the nation's CPI growing by 3.5 per cent year on year - a 22-month high - just last month.
When ultimately slow down the country's growth and subsequently hose down the demand for Australian commodities.
The Australia historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap of inequality society between the small educated elite groups who get highest pay by talk feast used mouth work controlling live essential resources of the country in every social platforms against the biggest less educated groups who get lowest pay by hands work squeezed by discriminative policies that sucking live blood from individual poor/less wealth off?
Voters’ voices do not hear?
Voters’ pains do not ease?
Voters’ cries do not care?
1.Poverty will not be phase out if no fairer resources to share;
2.Illness will not be reducing if no preventive measurement in real action;
3.Agriculture will not be revitalize if urbanization continuing its path;
4.Housing affordability will not be reach for young generation if government continues cashing from young generation debt by eating out the whole cake of education export revenue without plough back;
5.Manufacture industry will shrink smaller and smaller if no new elements there to power up to survive;
6.Employability will not in the sustainable mode for so long as manufacture and agriculture not going to boost.
Ma kee wai
(Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)
What Australia hung parliament demonstrating deep in voter’s heart?
Australia citizens now enter a very challenging political era for 70 years in the 2010 federal election, many reforms are demanding by voters are looking for a change with anger to share fairer resources supplied lives from the first term of government?
Voters handed down their decisive votes during election time are looking for an efficient, effective and economically run government. A high transparency in less mistaken caused processing under no discriminately enforced services government. A long term wealth creative vision with fast action moving forward progressing resulting value add to voters benefits in each term of governing.
Voters are crying for action right now to have improved resources support lives that suppose lead by a government in the following eight commitments:
1. What vision of prosperity voters seen?
2. Why action not enough in the past 3 years?
3. How many election promises has been fulfilled?
4. Where productivity motivation to voters?
5. What materials to speed up election promises processing?
6. Why some election promises in powerless process?
7. How far transparency in each department service voters wanted?
8. Where prioritized direction to empowerment the nation?