
Last Tuesday, Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Attorney-General Christian Porter released a second and final draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill.
The second draft, which was released after the government received widespread criticism from businesses, churches, community groups and individuals alike, included a number of key changes.
But while the second draft has been amended, the bill has been described as “incredibly harmful” and “unnecessary”.
In a new campaign video for Equality Australia, retired athletes Ian Thorpe and Lauren Jackson and author Benjamin Law have spoken out against the proposed legislation.
Watch Equality Australia’s explainer on how the Religious Discrimination Bill will affect us all below.
“The Religious Discrimination Bill will give people a licence to discriminate,” Ian Thorpe said in the video.
“What constitutes discrimination today will be considered okay tomorrow. It will take away your rights at work, at school and at hospitals when people say offensive things,” Benjamin Law added.
The updated bill, which was originally introduced in August, prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religious belief.
“This Bill will wind back hard-fought protections for women, LGBTIQ+ people and people with disabilities,” Anna Brown, the CEO of Equality Australia told Mamamia.
“Every person, religious or not, should be able to live, work, study, and access healthcare with dignity. This bill undermines that. Our laws should protect us all, equally.”
Here’s exactly what could happen to ordinary Australians if the Religious Discrimination Bill is passed:
Statements of Belief
Under the Religious Discrimination Bill, statements of religious belief will not be found to breach other discrimination laws.
As a result, this could lead to potentially unsafe workplaces and schools for women, the LGBTIQ+ community, single parents, people with a disability and more.
Here are some specific examples, according to the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC):
- A transgender person who is told by a cafe owner that their gender identity is not real.
- A woman who is told by a manager that women should submit to their husbands.
- A student with a disability being told by a teacher their disability is a trial imposed by God.
- A person of a minority faith being told by a retail assistant (from another religion) that they are a ‘dirty heathen destined for eternal damnation.’
- A single mother who, when dropping their child off at day-care, is told by a worker that they are sinful for denying their child a father.
Listen to the latest episode of Mamamia’s daily news podcast, The Quicky, below. Post continues after podcast.
Workplace
In the workplace, the Religious Discrimination Bill removes protections when colleagues, an employer, or manager make certain religiously-based statements to single parents, women or unmarried/divorced people.
According to Equality Australia, potential real-life examples of this could include:
- Telling a single mother that “every child needs a mother and a father – that’s what God intended.”
- Telling a survivor of domestic violence who left an abusive spouse that “divorce is a sin”.
- Telling a lesbian or bisexual woman that her “relationship is against God’s plan”.
Healthcare
The Religious Discrimination Bill prioritises religious views over patient health needs by strengthening the ability of health professionals to refuse treatment to patients on religious grounds.
This means, for example, that a doctor or pharmacist could refuse to dispense certain drugs on the basis of their religious beliefs.
The bill also removes discrimination protections for LGBTIQ+ people, people with disabilities, women and others, when health professionals make statements that are discriminatory.
Top Comments
The constant de-evolution of society of late is incredibly disheartening and concerning. Havent we learnt anything from all the conflict in the world caused under the guise of religious belief, we should be tightening up what they can get away with under the guise of religion not loosening it.
I've been reading a lot of similar stories on the internet and facebook, about all the horrible things we would be "allowed" to say under this legislation.
In all cases, anyone would already be "allowed" to say these things. They'd be a dick, but we still have free speech and being a dick isn't something you'd get charged for.
Not if some people had their way.