About six months ago, I was asked in an interview, ‘I know I am not allowed to ask this, but I am going to anyway, do you plan on becoming pregnant in the next year?’ How I should have answered: ‘Yes, yes I do.’
I would have loved to hear their response after that. If they responded with supportive things such as ‘great, well we’d have to support you when you are at that stage’, then I would have known that it would have been an employer who I could have respected and enjoyed working for (though, probably not really as they still shouldn’t have asked). Due to me being unprepared for the question (it was 2016 after all!), I responded in a way that I thought would not affect my position as a candidate for the position: ‘well, we have other things we want to get in order first.’
This whole experience has been grating on my mind, wishing I had answered differently. Wishing I had been quick enough to give them an answer that would have made them uncomfortable.
I was at least fortunate enough to be able to answer calmly, despite the thoughts running through my head: ‘That is actually none of your business. You have no idea if I have been struggling or not to have children or if I have been told that I can’t have children. Not only is it against the law to ask, it is an insanely personal question, would you have asked the same question to a male applicant if he intends to become a father in the next year?’
Mamamia Out Loud discuss the toughest interview questions out there. Post continues after audio.
The fact that they started the question with ‘I shouldn’t ask this, but…’ means they know full well of the implications around it. Had I said yes, and then not been offered the position, I could have reported it and made a big deal. However, how I interpreted this question at the time: ‘We don’t want you on board in this position if you can’t fully commit.’ It has annoyed me that I, myself interpreted the question this way. Why was that my first reaction?
Top Comments
It's a ridiculous question to ask, and unnecessary, even if the candidate sits in front of them 6 months pregnant, still 3 months to plan and prepare for their maternity leave. Unfortunately organisation no longer seek to invest time in forward resource planning for any gaps, be it normal annual leave, paternity/maternity leave - it all seems to come as a complete 'shock' to them!
You are looking for a career for your 90 year old mum with some dementia as the previous career got a job in the mines as an occupational therapist - your mum does not like change and becomes anxious around strangers to the point it profoundly effects her quality of life. Do you hire someone that will only be helping your mum for three months and then hire another and put your mum through the anxiousness of a new stranger in the house again or do you pay a premium to someone willing to commit to at least the next two years or the third option of hiring both the best candidate (that has only committed to three months) and a second willing to commit to two years and sell the house to pay for both salaries?
A career for a 90 year old?
I hope you reported them for asking that question. If employers like this don't get reported, nothing gets changed.