You are a mum, and it goes without saying that you would do anything for your child.
Assuming you’ve got a partner, and he’s the dad, well, ditto. He would kill for the baby, with his bare hands if necessary.
And yet, when it comes to actually keeping a baby alive, who does the work?
I don’t just mean the feeding, the changing, the burping. That’s the physical load. Who in your house carries the mental load? Who actually takes responsibility for absolutely everything the baby needs to thrive?
I think I know the answer.
Top Comments
Great article - I think Caroline and the other 2 commenters have been reading my mind. I suppose the micro-management of a baby's or a small child's needs by a mother is largely a biological imperative. However, as the child weans and grows, most mothers (myself included) find it hard to let go of this control possibly because we know or fear that dad/husband won't do it the same or right way. This may be justified or irrational. Either way, Caroline's description of the 'mental load' as children grow is completely accurate when I think of the social and extra curricular things I co-ordinate in my lunch break alone. I couldn't agree more that women must stop treating childcare costs as an outgoing to be borne by their earnings rather than as a household expense; this mentality kept no out if the permanent workforce for much longer than I anticipated; something I think adversely impacted on my parenting as well as my financial security. I suppose the challenge is trying to transfer and delegate some of the mental load to others in a more gradual way to avoid the crush of competing demands at a later stage.
This is SO true! And while we are at it....I'm damn sick of the assumption that stay at home mums (and no I'm not one) are bludging on their husbands. Their husbands are getting on-tap housekeeping and childcare services with the ability to live their working lives free of pesky distractions like carers leave' when the kids are too germ riddled for school or day-care. Someone is making sacrifices for this to happen. Generally not the person with Y chromosome!
You just made a lot of assumptions for someone who hates assumptions.
I asked around the guys at work, do you know how many agree that "stay at home mums are bludging on their husbands"? None. Nada. Not a single one.
I couldn't ask the bloke who is normally my off sider though, you'll never guess why. His kid is sick so he stayed home with them so his wife could go to work!
I think casual observer was suggesting that outside parties judge that way not the husband/father/partner of the child?!
I'm not suggesting the husband/father/partner is judging their partner that way. That's clear enough. It's that the comment is about being "sick of the assumption that stay at home mums" then makes a heap of assumptions about working dads.
"Their husbands are getting on-tap housekeeping and childcare services with the ability to live their working lives free of pesky distractions like carers leave' when the kids are too germ riddled for school or day-care. Someone is making sacrifices for this to happen. Generally not the person with Y chromosome!"
It's nothing but assumptions on the husband/father/partner. When I was a kid if I got sick sometimes mum would stay home with me, sometimes dad would.