Everyone wants to save Charlie Gard.
We see his tiny, delicate baby face, with tubes stuck into his nose. We see his cute little starry jumpsuit and the cheerful toy monkey resting on his chest. We see his brave, determined parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, the strain etched into their faces, fighting for their desperately ill little boy.
We all want the miracle ending where the tubes are taken out, and Charlie opens his eyes and goes home to live a normal, happy life with his loving mum and dad. That’s why more than 80,000 people have donated the equivalent of more than two million dollars for his treatment. That’s why there are hashtags like #jesuischarliegard. That’s why US president Donald Trump has stepped in to offer his help.
Sadly, for Charlie Gard, there won’t be a miracle ending. This 11-month-old British baby has severe, irreversible brain damage. The experimental treatment in the US has never been tried on someone with his form of mitochondrial depletion syndrome, and even if it did work on him, it couldn’t reverse the brain damage.
Top Comments
I've seen many people say Charlie should be allowed to "Die with Dignity", but I wonder how many parents would follow through if it were actually their own child. I think since he is unable to speak for himself, it falls to his parents to dictate what his best interests are, rather than the State. In regards to Donald, to those saying this is a political stunt, not so. This is the second time Donald Trump has offered his personal resources to assist a dying child, the first being in 1988 with Andrew Ten.
I would trust the actual doctors and give my child death, as he is suffering and will never recover. I know in my heart that I would not do this to my child.
And, regardless of what Trump has done in the past, this is a publicity stunt because he needs to deflect from his woeful performance as a world leader. He disgusts me.
This is just terrible. Their child is suffering. Another instance of Donald Trump sounding byting for popularity without actually knowing any of the details or facts. It's just pathetic.
"Right-wing commentators in the US are having their say, with one, Paul Nehlen, claiming that this case is “further proof that socialism kills”." no, it's further proof that people in leadership positions are scientifically illiterate and think that medical opinions do not require knowledge or facts and that they are quite happy to use a dying child to push their narrow, pro-life agenda.