Minutes. That’s all it took for NSW’s first female Liberal Premier Gladys Berejiklian to be subjected to sexism at its worst.
A so-called journalist had the temerity to warn her – in a passive aggressive way – that as an unmarried woman with no children, she could face some sexism in the role.
Yes, that as a woman who had not bred or doesn’t have a husband, she may not understand or empathise with those who do.
And to that I say: wake up. It’s 2017, not 1817. How dare you unleash your notions of what it constitutes to be a “real woman” on someone who frankly deserves better?
Now, the reporter may argue he was only reflecting society’s views as a whole. Yet this view is no longer the view of the majority of society as a whole - only an ignorant minority.
Former Prime Minster Tony Abbott was opposition leader when Julia Gillard became the PM, and he commented that under her leadership the Australian government was one that "lacks experience in raising children".
In 2007, former conservative senator Bill Heffernan unfairly surmised that Gillard was "deliberately barren", and as such unqualified for the job. He was rightfully condemned for his comments yet some ten years later, here we go again.
It appears there are some dinosaurs still roaming Jurassic Park, and their roar is a loud one. But here’s what I say – we need to roar louder.
Listen: Sallyanne Atkinson thinks a woman's place is in the boardroom. (Post continues after audio.)
After a weekend of marches all over the globe for female solidarity, it’s time we out the ignorant for what they are and remind such men that they are not somehow superior because their partners may have bore them children. They just didn’t use contraception; that doesn’t make them saints.
Top Comments
Can't agree with you more Wendy, this is a new generation and everyone has the right to do and make choices according to their beliefs. I dont get why men thinks that it is their right to judge us when they allow nobody to judge their outlook. It is disgusting to live in a society that repeals with women choices and actions. It should not me that hard to understand the emotional state we women go through!
I am child free and must say not too many people have made a thing about it with me, or done the superiority thing, but that could be because since I was young I was very vocal about not wanting to have children. I also have a very 'leftish' type family, not the traditional type and apart from that few relatives.
People possibly make some silent judgements of me, but who knows, I imagine that there are a broad range of opinions, those who pity me, those who envy me, and those who really couldn't care less how I lead my life.
I do get why someone would say 'every parents nightmare'. I think if they said 'the worse possible thing anyone could experience' then yeah that would be making the assumption that as a childless person you don't know real pain, but the statement 'every parents nightmare' well I can't see any offence in that myself because surely losing a child would be every parents nightmare, just like you could say that rape might be every woman's nightmare, or prostate cancer might be every man's nightmare etc. it doesn't mean that those people don't have other 'nightmares'. or that their 'nightmare' is any worse than anyone else's.
The line I hate though is when they say 'motherhood is the most important job in the world'. Really? So someone raising some kids is more important than doctors who cure diseases? More important than charity workers in third world countries? More important than leaders running a country?
Yes I get that raising a child well is hard work and an accomplishment and is good for society as that child will grow into a contributing adult and not become a criminal sociopath etc, but to call it 'the most important job in the world' when there are doctors and firefighters and police saving lives (and some putting their own lives on the line) I think is somewhat arrogant.