Allison Milner, University of Melbourne; Anne Kavanagh, University of Melbourne, and Belinda Hewitt, University of Melbourne
Despite the fact more women are employed than ever before, a gender pay gap is still a reality in Australia. Most recent figures show a pay difference of around 23%, with men earning on average A$26,853 more than women a year.
But it’s not just the long-term financial consequences of the pay gap being felt by women. Evidence shows it also impacts on their physical and mental health.
A complex combination
The pay gap results from a complex combination of factors. Women are less often employed in the kind of private-sector jobs that provide opportunities for high-earning management roles, such as managing directors and CEOs.
They are more often employed in the public sector, in areas such as teaching, public service (the “professional” category in the figure), administration and sales – that carry a lower level of pay.
They are more likely to be in lower-status jobs that not only have lower pay but poorer working conditions, such as less autonomy and control over how, what, where and when work is undertaken. Low job control is a well established risk factor for poor physical and mental health.
Once employed, women are less likely to engage in wage bargaining. An Australian study compared the pay gap between female and male managers in Australia and found female managers earned, on average, about 27% less than their male counterparts.
Other research shows men in female-dominated jobs are likely to earn more than their female counterparts. Male promotion in female-dominated jobs has been called the “glass elevator”.
Top Comments
I totally agree with everything in this article.
Why don't we ever talk about the gap in how much mums vs dads see their kids. Is that not a important and telling statistic also. Funny, never see that one when this subject comes up. Seems feminists want women to have their cake and eat it too.
The Family Court allocates primary care as a direct reflection of who the children are most used to caring for them. If children have been mostly cared for by their mother then practically speaking, they would be more distressed at being placed in the primary care of their father. Whilst the Family Law system is certainly broken and a toothless tiger against mothers behaving badly, it still has to disrupt the children as little as possible and unfortunately, whilst women are still doing most of the care compared to men, women must still get allocated predominant primary care. To turn this around, men should start sacrificing career and money to participate more in the care of children whilst relationships are intact, to prevent losing a lot of time with their children after separation. Judges will then start to see the mother or father as primary carer, without gender bias. The Family Court is a litmus test for what is happening in families out there. Couples should equally care for children and equally finance their households, rather than the traditional stereotype that is still happening in most homes. And the science says, children are happier with one primary carer in one main home, not being ferried back and forth between two.